The impact of technology type and life cycle on IT productivity variance: A contingency theoretical perspective

被引:14
作者
Xu, Xiaobo [1 ]
Zhang, Weiyong [2 ]
Li, Ling [2 ]
机构
[1] Amer Univ Sharjah, Sch Business Adm, Dept Mkt & Informat Syst, Sharjah, U Arab Emirates
[2] Old Dominion Univ, Strome Coll Business, Dept Informat Technol & Decis Sci, Norfolk, VA 23529 USA
关键词
IT productivity paradox; IT productivity variance; Contingency approach; Technology type; Technology life cycle; Performance improvement; RESOURCE-BASED PERSPECTIVE; INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; FIRM PERFORMANCE; BUSINESS VALUE; ORGANIZATIONAL TRANSFORMATION; OPERATIONAL PERFORMANCE; COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE; INVESTMENT; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.08.007
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
The relationship between IT investment and performance improvement has been a classic research subject. In earlier research it was characterized as the famous "IT productivity paradox." Decades of research effort later, many IS/IT researchers no longer consider this relationship paradoxical, but it remains a challenge to fully explain "IT productivity variance," that is, a large portion of unexplainable performance variance observed in empirical studies. In this paper, we take a theory development approach to this important issue. Our effort focuses on examining the theoretical foundation of "IT productivity variance." Through literature review, we identify and contrast three prevailing theoretical perspectives to suggest the plausibility of a contingency approach. Contextual factors can significantly affect the relationship between IT investment and performance improvement. We identified three such factors that were not thoroughly examined: level of performance measurement, technology type, and technology life cycle. We subsequently propose a contingency model in light of these factors, and develop a set of research propositions. Our effort is a first-step toward bridging a major gap in the literature. The proposed model, while awaiting empirical validation, can provide useful guidance to practicing managers. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1193 / 1204
页数:12
相关论文
共 132 条
[1]  
Alpar P., 1990, Journal of Management Information Systems, V7, P55, DOI 10.1080/07399019008968344
[2]   STRATEGIC ASSETS AND ORGANIZATIONAL RENT [J].
AMIT, R ;
SCHOEMAKER, PJH .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1993, 14 (01) :33-46
[3]  
Anantatmula Vittal, 2008, VINE, V38, P357, DOI 10.1108/03055720810904862
[4]   Information systems use as strategy practice: A multi-dimensional view of strategic information system implementation and use [J].
Arvidsson, Viktor ;
Holmstrom, Jonny ;
Lyytinen, Kalle .
JOURNAL OF STRATEGIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2014, 23 (01) :45-61
[5]   ORGANIZATIONAL THEORIES - SOME CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION [J].
BACHARACH, SB .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1989, 14 (04) :496-515
[6]  
Bagayogo FF, 2014, J ASSOC INF SYST, V15, P361
[7]   Process-based knowledge management system for continuous improvement [J].
Barber, Kevin ;
Eduardo Munive-Hernandez, J. ;
Keane, John .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITY & RELIABILITY MANAGEMENT, 2006, 23 (08) :1002-+
[8]   Project performance and the enabling role of information technology: An exploratory study on the role of alignment [J].
Bardhan, Indranil R. ;
Krishnan, Vish V. ;
Lin, Shu .
M&SOM-MANUFACTURING & SERVICE OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2007, 9 (04) :579-595
[9]   FIRM RESOURCES AND SUSTAINED COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE [J].
BARNEY, J .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 1991, 17 (01) :99-120
[10]   The information technology productivity paradox revisited: A theoretical and empirical investigation in the manufacturing sector [J].
Barua, A ;
Lee, B .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FLEXIBLE MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS, 1997, 9 (02) :145-166