Using kamikaze components in multi-attempt missions with abort option

被引:22
作者
Levitin, Gregory [1 ,2 ]
Xing, Liudong [3 ]
Dai, Yuanshun [1 ]
机构
[1] Southwest Jiaotong Univ, Sch Comp & Artificial Intelligence, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[2] NOGA Israel Independent Syst Operator, Heifa, Israel
[3] Univ Massachusetts, Dartmouth, MA 02747 USA
关键词
Mission abort; Multiple attempts; Rescue procedure; Mission success probability; Lost components Kamikaze components; SYSTEMS SUBJECT; POLICY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ress.2022.108745
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Modeling and optimizing mission abort policies have received intensive research attention in the past decade. While most of the existing models assumed single-attempt missions, few of them considered multi-attempt missions (i.e., a system component may re-attempt the mission after being rescued successfully and properly maintained). However, the existing multi-attempt studies assumed the same abort policy (AP) for all the system components. This paper extends the state of the art by putting forward a new shock-based AP model where a subset of available components during each attempt is identified as kamikaze components that operate with a riskier AP than the rest of the available components, and the number of kamikaze components and APs for both groups of components (kamikaze and non-kamikaze) may change from attempt to attempt. The AP optimization problem is solved using the genetic algorithm to minimize the total expected cost of losses. The problem is further generalized to incorporate the total number of components and the maximum number of mission at-tempts as additional decision variables. The proposed AP and solutions to both optimization problems are illustrated through a detailed case study of a multi-UAV system undergoing random shocks during both the primary surveillance mission and the rescue procedure.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
Cha JH, 2011, J APPL PROBAB, V48, P258, DOI 10.1239/jap/1300198148
[2]   Optimal Task Abort and Maintenance Policies Considering Time Redundancy [J].
Chen, Ke ;
Zhao, Xian ;
Qiu, Qingan .
MATHEMATICS, 2022, 10 (09)
[3]  
Goldberg D. E., 1989, GENETIC ALGORITHMS S
[4]  
Joyner II., 2017, AIAA SCITECH FORUM, DOI DOI 10.2514/6.2017-0235
[5]   Mission Abort Policy in Heterogeneous Nonrepairable 1-Out-of-N Warm Standby Systems [J].
Levhitin, Gregory ;
Xing, Liudong ;
Dai, Yuanshun .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RELIABILITY, 2018, 67 (01) :342-354
[6]   Mission aborting and system rescue for multi-state systems with arbitrary structure [J].
Levitin, Gregory ;
Xing, Liudong ;
Dai, Yuanshun .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2022, 219
[7]   Mission Aborting in n-Unit Systems With Work Sharing [J].
Levitin, Gregory ;
Xing, Liudong ;
Dai, Yuanshun .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN CYBERNETICS-SYSTEMS, 2022, 52 (08) :4875-4886
[8]   Optimal mission aborting in multistate systems with storage [J].
Levitin, Gregory ;
Xing, Liudong ;
Dai, Yuanshun .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2022, 218
[9]   Joint optimal mission aborting and replacement and maintenance scheduling in dual-unit standby systems [J].
Levitin, Gregory ;
Xing, Liudong ;
Dai, Yanshun .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2021, 216
[10]   Genetic algorithms in reliability engineering [J].
Levitin, Gregory .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2006, 91 (09) :975-976