Completion of partially worked-out examples as a generation strategy for improving monitoring accuracy

被引:44
作者
Baars, Martine [1 ]
Visser, Sandra [1 ]
van Gog, Tamara [1 ]
de Bruin, Anique [2 ]
Paas, Fred [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, Inst Psychol, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Maastricht Univ, Dept Educ Dev & Res, Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] Univ Wollongong, Interdisciplinary Educ Res Inst, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia
关键词
Judgments of learning; Monitoring accuracy; Completion problems; Worked examples; Problem solving; SELF-REGULATION; METACOMPREHENSION ACCURACY; COGNITIVE-LOAD; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; JUDGMENTS; CUE; SCHOOL; METACOGNITION; INSTRUCTION; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.cedpsych.2013.09.001
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
Students' Judgments of Learning (JOLs) are often inaccurate: students often overestimate their future test performance. Because of the consequences that JOL inaccuracy can have for regulating study activities, an important question is how JOL accuracy can be improved. When learning texts, JOL accuracy has been shown to improve through 'generation strategies', such as generating keywords, summaries, or concept maps. This study investigated whether JOL accuracy can also be improved by means of a generation strategy (i.e., completing blank steps in the examples) when learning to solve problems through worked example study. Secondary education students of 14-15 years old (cf. USA 9th grade) either studied worked examples or completed partially worked examples and gave JOLs. It was found that completion of worked examples resulted in underestimation of future test performance. It seems that completing partially worked-out examples made students less confident about future performance than studying fully worked examples. However, this did not lead to better regulation of study. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:395 / 406
页数:12
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]   Calibration: What is it and why it matters? An introduction to the special issue on calibrating calibration [J].
Alexander, Patricia A. .
LEARNING AND INSTRUCTION, 2013, 24 :1-3
[2]   Why do delayed summaries improve metacomprehension accuracy? [J].
Anderson, Mary C. M. ;
Thiede, Keith W. .
ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2008, 128 (01) :110-118
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2011, HDB DESIGNING PROBLE
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2009, HDB METACOGNITION SE
[5]  
Atkinson RK, 2000, REV EDUC RES, V70, P181, DOI 10.2307/1170661
[6]  
Baddeley A. D., 1986, WORKING MEMORY
[8]   Monitoring accuracy and self-regulation when learning to play a chess endgame [J].
De Bruin, ABH ;
Rikers, RMJP ;
Schmidt, HG .
APPLIED COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 19 (02) :167-181
[9]   Improving metacomprehension accuracy and self-regulation in cognitive skill acquisition: The effect of learner expertise [J].
de Bruin, Anique B. H. ;
Rikers, Remy M. J. P. ;
Schmidt, Henk G. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 19 (4-5) :671-688
[10]   Improving self-monitoring and self-regulation: From cognitive psychology to the classroom [J].
de Bruin, Anique B. H. ;
van Gog, Tamara .
LEARNING AND INSTRUCTION, 2012, 22 (04) :245-252