Biological downsizing. Acetabular defect reconstruction in revision total hip arthroplasty

被引:9
|
作者
Koob, S. [1 ]
Scheidt, S. [1 ]
Randau, T. M. [1 ]
Gathen, M. [1 ]
Wimmer, M. D. [1 ]
Wirtz, D. C. [1 ]
Gravius, S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Rhein Friedrich Wilhelms Univ Bonn, Klin & Poliklin Orthopadie & Unfallchirurg, Sigmund Freud Str 25, D-53127 Bonn, Germany
来源
ORTHOPADE | 2017年 / 46卷 / 02期
关键词
Autologous transplants; Hip prosthesis; Homografts; Revision total hip arthroplasty; Tissue engineering; DONOR SITE MORBIDITY; FOLLOW-UP; BONE-GRAFT; ILIAC CREST; TISSUE; ALLOGRAFTS; CLASSIFICATION; MANAGEMENT; COMPONENTS; RING;
D O I
10.1007/s00132-016-3379-x
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Periacetabular bony defects remain a great challenge in revision total hip arthroplasty. After assessment and classification of the defect and selection of a suitable implant the primary stable fixation and sufficient biological reconstitution of a sustainable bone stock are essential for long term success in acetabular revision surgery. Biological defect reconstruction aims for the down-sizing of periacetabular defects for later revision surgeries. In the field of biological augmentation several methods are currently available. Autologous transplants feature a profound osseointegrative capacity. However, limitations such as volume restrictions and secondary complications at the donor site have to be considered. Structural allografts show little weight bearing potential in the long term and high failure rates. In clinical practice, the usage of spongious chips implanted via impaction bone grafting technique in combination with antiprotrusio cages for the management of contained defects have shown promising long time results. Nevertheless, when dealing with craniolateral acetabular and dorsal column defects, the additional implantation of macroporous metal implants or augments should be considered since biological augmentation has shown little clinical success in these particular cases. This article provides an overview of the current clinically available biological augmentation methods of peri-acetabular defects. Due to the limitations of autologous and allogeneic bone transplants in terms of size and availability, the emerging field of innovative implantable tissue engineering constructs gains interest and will also be discussed in this article.
引用
收藏
页码:158 / 167
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Constrained Acetabular Components Used in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Registry Analysis
    Lewis, Peter L.
    Graves, Stephen E.
    de Steiger, Richard N.
    Cuthbert, Alana R.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2017, 32 (10): : 3102 - 3107
  • [32] Cancellous Impaction Bone Grafting of Acetabular Defects in Complex Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Patil, Nilesh
    Hwang, Katherine
    Goodman, Stuart B.
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2012, 35 (03) : E306 - E312
  • [33] Bone morphogenic protein-2 use in revision total hip arthroplasty with acetabular defects
    Nodzo, Scott R.
    Boyle, Keely K.
    Pavlesen, Sonja
    Rachala, Sridhar
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2018, 42 (04) : 783 - 789
  • [34] Acetabular cup positioning in revision total hip arthroplasty with Paprosky type III acetabular defects: Martell radiographic analysis
    Choi, Ho-Rim
    Anderson, David
    Foster, Scott
    Beal, Matthew
    Lee, Jo Ann
    Barr, Christopher
    Malchau, Henrik
    McCarthy, Joseph
    Kwon, Young-Min
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2013, 37 (10) : 1905 - 1910
  • [35] Constrained Acetabular Liners Cemented Into Cages During Total Hip Revision Arthroplasty
    Khoury, John I.
    Malkani, Arthur L.
    Adler, Edward M.
    Markel, David C.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2010, 25 (06): : 901 - 905
  • [36] Bone remodeling after revision total hip arthroplasty for large acetabular defects
    Ramesh, Angelika
    Di Laura, Anna
    De Angelis, Sara
    Henckel, Johann
    Hart, Alister
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 2024, 42 (12) : 2784 - 2795
  • [37] Acetabular defect reconstruction in revision surgery of the hip. Autologous, homologous or metal?
    Gravius, S.
    Pagenstert, G.
    Weber, O.
    Kraska, N.
    Roehrig, H.
    Wirtz, D. C.
    ORTHOPADE, 2009, 38 (08): : 729 - +
  • [38] The Utilization of Metal Augments Allows Better Biomechanical Reconstruction of the Hip in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty With Severe Acetabular Defects: A Comparative Study
    Zhou, Baochun
    Zhou, Yixin
    Yang, Dejin
    Tang, Hao
    Shao, Hongyi
    Huang, Yong
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2018, 33 (12): : 3724 - 3733
  • [39] Acetabular custom-made implants for severe acetabular bone defect in revision total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature
    Francesco Chiarlone
    Andrea Zanirato
    Luca Cavagnaro
    Mattia Alessio-Mazzola
    Lamberto Felli
    Giorgio Burastero
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2020, 140 : 415 - 424
  • [40] Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty for Paprosky Type III Acetabular Defect With Structural Allograft and Tantalum Trabecular Metal Acetabular Cup
    Chang, Chih-Hsiang
    Hu, Chih-Chien
    Chen, Chun-Chieh
    Mahajan, John
    Chang, Yuhan
    Shih, Hsin-Nung
    Kwon, Young-Min
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2018, 41 (06) : E861 - E867