Influencing Factors of Travel Route Choice in Advanced Transportation Information Service System Using Mixed Logit Model

被引:0
作者
Cao, Gengyong [1 ]
Zhang, Chunqin [2 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Sci Res Inst Transport, Hangzhou 310006, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Sci Tech Univ, Sch Civil Engn & Architecture, Hangzhou 310018, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2016 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CIVIL, ARCHITECTURAL AND HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING (ICCAHE 2016) | 2016年 / 95卷
关键词
Advanced Transportation Information Service system; traffic information engineering; travel route choice; Stated Preference survey; mixed logit model; VARIABLE MESSAGE SIGNS; TRAFFIC INFORMATION; DRIVER RESPONSE; BEHAVIOR; DIVERSION;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
In order to understand how traffic information influences travel route choice. State Preference survey is carried out to investigate travelers' behavior data. Mixed logit models are established to analyze the factors influencing travel route choice, one for overall object model and the other for typical object model. The models are then verified using survey data from different range. The results confirm that travelers' socio-economic characteristics, the severity of traffic incident or congestion, travel time saved by the alternative route, the delay on the original route, road network knowledge, and the travelers' evaluation and attitude on traffic information are the main factors influencing travel route choice. There are some different influencing factors between overall object model and typical object model. The study underscores the significance of traffic information and the potential effect of traffic information on route choice, and provides the basis for traffic information dissemination methods and strategies.
引用
收藏
页码:387 / 398
页数:12
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Modeling drivers' diversion from normal routes under ATIS using generalized estimating equations and binomial probit link function [J].
Abdel-Aty, M ;
Abdalla, MF .
TRANSPORTATION, 2004, 31 (03) :327-348
[2]   Using stated preference data for studying the effect of advanced traffic information on drivers' route choice [J].
AbdelAty, MA ;
Kitamura, R ;
Jovanis, PP .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART C-EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES, 1997, 5 (01) :39-50
[3]   A combined traveler behavior and system performance model with advanced traveler information systems [J].
Al-Deek, HM ;
Khattak, AJ ;
Thananjeyan, P .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 1998, 32 (07) :479-493
[4]   Which road do I take? A learning-based model of route-choice behavior with real-time information [J].
Ben-Elia, Eran ;
Shiftan, Yoram .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2010, 44 (04) :249-264
[5]  
Bonsall P., 1991, USING AN INTERACTIVE ROUTE-CHOICE SIMULATOR TO INVESTIGATE DRIVERS'COMPLIANCE WITH ROUTE GUIDANCE ADVICE
[6]   Driver response to variable message sign information in London [J].
Chatterjee, K ;
Hounsell, NB ;
Firmin, PE ;
Bonsall, PW .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART C-EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES, 2002, 10 (02) :149-169
[7]   Modelling drivers' compliance and route choice behaviour in response to travel information [J].
Dia, Hussein ;
Panwai, Sakda .
NONLINEAR DYNAMICS, 2007, 49 (04) :493-509
[8]  
Duffell J., 1988, TRAFFIC ENG CONTROL, V29
[9]   Travel mode choice and transit route choice behavior in Montreal: Insights from McGill University members commute patterns [J].
Eluru, Naveen ;
Chakour, Vincent ;
El-Geneidy, Ahmed M. .
Public Transport, 2012, 4 (02) :129-149
[10]   Variable message signs and radio traffic information: An integrated empirical analysis of drivers' route choice behaviour [J].
Emmerink, RHM ;
Nijkamp, P ;
Rietveld, P ;
VanOmmeren, JN .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 1996, 30 (02) :135-153