Life cycle assessment of biodiesel production in China

被引:97
作者
Liang, Sai [1 ]
Xu, Ming [2 ,3 ]
Zhang, Tianzhu [1 ]
机构
[1] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Environm, State Key Joint Lab Environm Simulat & Pollut Con, Being 100084, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Michigan, Sch Nat Resources & Environm, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Agriculture; Bioenergy; Biofuel; Input-output analysis; Life cycle assessment; LAND-USE; BIOFUELS; WATER; MODEL; OIL;
D O I
10.1016/j.biortech.2012.11.037
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
This study aims to evaluate energy, economic, and environmental performances of seven categories of biodiesel feedstocks by using the mixed-unit input-output life cycle assessment method. Various feedstocks have different environmental performances, indicating potential environmental problem-shift. Jatropha seed, castor seed, waste cooking oil, and waste extraction oil are preferred feedstocks for biodiesel production in the short term. Positive net energy yields and positive net economic benefits of biodiesel from these four feedstocks are 2.3-52.0% of their life cycle energy demands and 74.1-448.4% of their economic costs, respectively. Algae are preferred in the long term mainly due to their less arable land demands. Special attention should be paid to potential environmental problems accompanying feedstock choice: freshwater use, ecotoxicity potentials, photochemical oxidation potential, acidification potential and eutrophication potential. Moreover, key processes are identified by sensitivity analysis to direct future technology improvements. Finally, supporting measures are proposed to optimize China's biodiesel development. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:72 / 77
页数:6
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2012, BP STAT REV WORLD EN
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Life Cycle Assessment - Principles and Framework
[3]   Land-Use and Alternative Bioenergy Pathways for Waste Biomass [J].
Campbell, J. E. ;
Block, E. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 44 (22) :8665-8669
[4]   Environmental Life Cycle Comparison of Algae to Other Bioenergy Feedstocks [J].
Clarens, Andres F. ;
Resurreccion, Eleazer P. ;
White, Mark A. ;
Colosi, Lisa M. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 44 (05) :1813-1819
[5]   Optimization of biodiesel supply chains based on small farmers: A case study in Brazil [J].
de Campos Cesar Leao, Raphael Riemke ;
Hamacher, Silvio ;
Oliveira, Fabricio .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 102 (19) :8958-8963
[6]   Improving crop productivity and resource use efficiency to ensure food security and environmental quality in China [J].
Fan, Mingsheng ;
Shen, Jianbo ;
Yuan, Lixing ;
Jiang, Rongfeng ;
Chen, Xinping ;
Davies, William J. ;
Zhang, Fusuo .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 2012, 63 (01) :13-24
[7]   Biofuels, Land, and Water: A Systems Approach to Sustainability [J].
Gopalakrishnan, Gayathri ;
Negri, M. Cristina ;
Wang, Michael ;
Wu, May ;
Snyder, Seth W. ;
Lafreniere, Lorraine .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 43 (15) :6094-6100
[8]   China:: Emissions pattern of the world leader in CO2 emissions from fossil fuel consumption and cement production [J].
Gregg, Jay S. ;
Andres, Robert J. ;
Marland, Gregg .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2008, 35 (08)
[9]   A process model to estimate biodiesel production costs [J].
Haas, MJ ;
McAloon, AJ ;
Yee, WC ;
Foglia, TA .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 97 (04) :671-678
[10]   Greenhouse gas reductions through enhanced use of residues in the life cycle of Malaysian palm oil derived biodiesel [J].
Hansen, Sune Balle ;
Olsen, Stig Irving ;
Ujang, Zaini .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 104 :358-366