Shark-inflicted injury frequencies, escape ability, and habitat use of green and loggerhead turtles

被引:92
作者
Heithaus, MR [1 ]
Frid, A [1 ]
Dill, LM [1 ]
机构
[1] Simon Fraser Univ, Dept Biol Sci, Behav Ecol Res Grp, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
D O I
10.1007/s00227-001-0712-6
中图分类号
Q17 [水生生物学];
学科分类号
071004 ;
摘要
Interactions between large marine predators and their prey are difficult to observe and little is known about the risk of predation faced by sea turtles. The frequency of predator-inflicted injuries, however, has afforded insights into the predation risk faced by many taxa. We measured the frequency of shark-inflicted injuries on green (Chelonia mydas) and loggerhead (Caretta caretta) sea turtles in Shark Bay, Western Australia with a view to determining differences between species and sex-classes in the risk of predation from tiger sharks (Galeocerdo cuvier). Furthermore, we investigated how escape ability and habitat use might influence the probability of turtles being injured by sharks. Shark-inflicted injuries were more frequent on loggerhead than on green turtles, and most frequent on adult male loggerhead turtles. Species effects could not be attributed to differences in habitat use, since green turtles were found in habitats favored by tiger sharks more often than were loggerhead turtles. Green turtles, however, were faster and maneuvered better than loggerhead turtles, suggesting that escape ability is a factor in interspecific differences in injury frequency. The sex-class difference in injury frequency of loggerhead turtles suggests that males face greater predation risk than females and may take more risks. For green turtles, the lack of a sex difference in injury frequency might be due to greater escape ability lowering overall predation risk or to no differences between sexes in the benefits of risk-taking.
引用
收藏
页码:229 / 236
页数:8
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
Bjorndal Karen A., 1997, P199
[2]  
Bleich VC, 1997, WILDLIFE MONOGR, P1
[3]  
Compagno, 1984, FAO FISH SYNOP, V4, P250, DOI DOI 10.1071/MF9920109
[4]   DISTANCE-TO-COVER AND THE ESCAPE DECISIONS OF AN AFRICAN CICHLID FISH, MELANOCHROMIS-CHIPOKAE [J].
DILL, LM .
ENVIRONMENTAL BIOLOGY OF FISHES, 1990, 27 (02) :147-152
[5]   Predation by white sharks Carcharodon carcharias (Chondrichthyes: Lamnidae) upon chelonians, with new records from the Mediterranean Sea and a first record of the ocean sunfish Mola mola (Osteichthyes: Molidae) as stomach contents [J].
Fergusson, IK ;
Compagno, LJV ;
Marks, MA .
ENVIRONMENTAL BIOLOGY OF FISHES, 2000, 58 (04) :447-453
[6]   WHY DO HUNTING CHEETAHS PREFER MALE GAZELLES [J].
FITZGIBBON, CD .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 1990, 40 :837-845
[7]   Predator-prey and competitive interactions between sharks (order Selachii) and dolphins (suborder Odontoceti): a review [J].
Heithaus, MR .
JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 2001, 253 :53-68
[8]   Shark attacks on bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops aduncus) in Shark Bay, Western Australia:: Attack rate, bite scar frequencies and attack seasonality. [J].
Heithaus, MR .
MARINE MAMMAL SCIENCE, 2001, 17 (03) :526-539
[9]   The biology of tiger sharks, Galeocerdo cuvier, in Shark Bay, Western Australia:: Sex ratio, size distribution, diet, and seasonal changes in catch rates [J].
Heithaus, MR .
ENVIRONMENTAL BIOLOGY OF FISHES, 2001, 61 (01) :25-36
[10]  
HEITHAUS MR, IN PRESS MAR BIOL