Studying the Effect of Iris Mechanics on the Pupillary Light Reflex Using Brimonidine-Induced Anisocoria
被引:14
作者:
Chen, Yanjun
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Iowa, Dept Ophthalmol & Visual Sci, Iowa City, IA USA
Univ Wisconsin, Dept Ophthalmol & Visual Sci, Madison, WI USAUniv Iowa, Dept Ophthalmol & Visual Sci, Iowa City, IA USA
Chen, Yanjun
[1
,2
]
Kardon, Randy H.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Iowa, Dept Ophthalmol & Visual Sci, Iowa City, IA USA
Iowa City VA Ctr Prevent & Treatment Visual Loss, Dept Vet Affairs Hosp, Iowa City, IA USAUniv Iowa, Dept Ophthalmol & Visual Sci, Iowa City, IA USA
Kardon, Randy H.
[1
,3
]
机构:
[1] Univ Iowa, Dept Ophthalmol & Visual Sci, Iowa City, IA USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Ophthalmol & Visual Sci, Madison, WI USA
[3] Iowa City VA Ctr Prevent & Treatment Visual Loss, Dept Vet Affairs Hosp, Iowa City, IA USA
PURPOSE. To study and correct for the limiting effect of iris mechanics on the amplitude of light-evoked pupil contractions in order to derive a more clinically accurate assessment of afferent input to the visual system. METHODS. Transient pupil responses were recorded to a series of 1-second red Ganzfeld light stimuli with a stepwise increase in stimulus intensity using a binocular infrared computerized pupillometer. One eye of eight healthy subjects was treated with 0.2% brimonidine tartrate ophthalmic solution to induce pupil size reduction. The amount of pupil contraction as a function of stimulus intensity was compared between the brimonidine-treated, miotic eye and the untreated eye. RESULTS. Brimonidine treatment produced significant reduction in pupil size in healthy subjects (mean reduction in pupil size: 1.78 +/- 0.35 mm, P < 0.05). For increasing light intensity, the treated pupil started to show reduced pupil contractions compared with the contralateral untreated pupil when the peak of pupil contraction reached an average pupil size of 3.25 +/- 0.61 mm (range, 2.38-4.44 mm). When measured by percent pupil contraction (contraction amplitude/baseline pupil diameter), the pupil response as a function of stimulus intensity in the treated, miotic eye did not differ from that in the untreated eye. CONCLUSIONS. Iris mechanics limits the amount of pupil contraction and can act to reduce the assessed neuronal integration of the pupil light reflex. Pupil response assessed by using percent contraction amplitude is least affected by mechanical effects and provides a more accurate approximation of afferent input.