What causes geographical variation in the species-area relationships? A test from forests in China

被引:15
|
作者
Qiao, Xiujuan [1 ,2 ]
Tang, Zhiyao [1 ,2 ]
Shen, Zehao [1 ,2 ]
Fang, Jingyun [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Dept Ecol, Coll Urban & Environm Sci, CN-100871 Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Peking Univ, Key Lab Earth Surface Proc, Minist Educ, CN-100871 Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
BETA-DIVERSITY; LATITUDINAL GRADIENTS; CANONICAL DISTRIBUTION; NICHE BREADTH; SCALE; PATTERNS; SIZE; BIODIVERSITY; COMMONNESS; DEPENDENCE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1600-0587.2011.06869.x
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
The increase of species richness with sampling area and the decrease with latitude and altitude are two of the most frequently studied patterns in biogeography. However, few studies have simultaneously examined these two patterns to investigate how speciesarea relationships (SAR) vary with latitude and altitude. In this study, we explore the spatial patterns of SAR in forests in China by investigating numbers of species by life form group (trees, shrubs and herbs) in 32 nested plots from 12 mountains ranging from 18.7 degrees N to 51.9 degrees N in latitude and from 300 to 3150 m in altitude. The slopes of the power law SAR (z-values) decreased with increasing latitude for all life forms except herbaceous plants, and also decreased with increasing altitude for all life forms but not for shrubs. Latitude and altitude, as well as their interactions, together explained 65.4, 61.8, 48.9 and 45.3% of the variation in z-values for overall species, trees, shrubs and herbaceous plants, respectively. In addition, actual evapotranspiration affected SAR significantly, but this effect varied significantly among life forms. We concluded that there are significant geographical patterns of SAR for China's forests, which is primarily controlled by energy availability.
引用
收藏
页码:1110 / 1116
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Accounting for geographical variation in species-area relationships improves the prediction of plant species richness at the global scale
    Gerstner, Katharina
    Dormann, Carsten F.
    Vaclavik, Tomas
    Kreft, Holger
    Seppelt, Ralf
    JOURNAL OF BIOGEOGRAPHY, 2014, 41 (02) : 261 - 273
  • [2] Global pattern and local variation in species-area relationships
    Solymos, Peter
    Lele, Subhash R.
    GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY, 2012, 21 (02): : 109 - 120
  • [3] Matrix transformation alters species-area relationships in fragmented coastal forests
    Freeman, Marc T.
    Olivier, Pieter I.
    van Aarde, Rudi J.
    LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2018, 33 (02) : 307 - 322
  • [4] The imprint of the geographical, evolutionary and ecological context on species-area relationships
    Drakare, S
    Lennon, JJ
    Hillebrand, H
    ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2006, 9 (02) : 215 - 227
  • [5] Species-area relationships as indicators of human impacts on demersal fish communities
    Novaglio, Camilla
    Ferretti, Francesco
    Smith, Anthony D. M.
    Frusher, Stewart
    DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS, 2016, 22 (11) : 1186 - 1198
  • [6] Speciation-rate dependence in species-area relationships
    Pigolotti, Simone
    Cencini, Massimo
    JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 2009, 260 (01) : 83 - 89
  • [7] Species-area and species-sampling effort relationships: disentangling the effects
    Azovsky, Andrey I.
    ECOGRAPHY, 2011, 34 (01) : 18 - 30
  • [8] Species-area relationships arise from interaction of habitat heterogeneity and species pool
    Kolasa, J.
    Manne, L. L.
    Pandit, S. N.
    HYDROBIOLOGIA, 2012, 685 (01) : 135 - 144
  • [9] Species-Area Relationships Are Controlled by Species Traits
    Franzen, Markus
    Schweiger, Oliver
    Betzholtz, Per-Eric
    PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (05):
  • [10] Estimates of species extinctions from species-area relationships strongly depend on ecological context
    Matias, Miguel G.
    Gravel, Dominique
    Guilhaumon, Francois
    Desjardins-Proulx, Philippe
    Loreau, Michel
    Muenkemueller, Tamara
    Mouquet, Nicolas
    ECOGRAPHY, 2014, 37 (05) : 431 - 442