The role of immunochemistry in the direct measurement of low density lipoprotein cholesterol

被引:0
|
作者
Cole, TG
机构
来源
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL LIGAND ASSAY | 1996年 / 19卷 / 03期
关键词
direct LDL-cholesterol; LDL-cholesterol; lipoproteins; immunoseparation; lipids;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
The concentration of low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is the primary parameter for diagnosis of coronary heart disease and for the determination of appropriate therapy. The development of an assay that would directly measure LDL-C would be an improvement over the current method of estimating LDL-C by the Friedewald equation, which requires the measurement of total cholesterol, total triglycerides, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and which has some serious clinical limitations. The Direct LDL-C(TM) assay uses latex bead-bound antibodies against human apolipoproteins A-I and E to separate LDL from other lipoproteins, The assay requires only a single measurement of cholesterol which can be made on essentially any clinical analyzer. In seven clinical evaluations, the performance parameters of the Direct LDL-C assay were generally equivalent to the Friedewald equation for specimens for which the Friedewald equation was appropriate and/or to the beta-quantification method. Precision, accuracy, and the ability to classify specimens into risk categories were similar. The Direct LDL-C assay surpasses the clinical usefulness of the Friedewald equation in that it is appropriate for use,vith specimens from nonfasted or type III dyslipoproteinemic patients and requires only 30 mu L of specimen. Hypertriglyceridemia has variable effects on the Direct LDL-C assay and may cause overestimation of LDL-C in some specimens with triglycerides between about 400 and 800 mg/dL. The improvement of the Direct LDL-C assay over the Friedewald equation is basically one of convenience rather than analytical superiority for most specimens.
引用
收藏
页码:168 / 171
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Direct measurement of low density lipoprotein cholesterol
    Yuan, DH
    Lin, G
    Chen, JY
    PROGRESS IN BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOPHYSICS, 2000, 27 (05) : 562 - 564
  • [2] Underestimation of Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol With the Friedewald Equation Versus a Direct Homogenous Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol Assay
    Jialal, Ishwarlal
    Inn, Michael
    Siegel, David
    Devaraj, Sridevi
    LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2017, 48 (03) : 220 - 224
  • [3] Comparison of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Concentrations by Direct Measurement and by Friedewald Calculation
    Sung, Ki-Chul
    Kwon, Chang Hee
    Lee, Mi Yeon
    Kwon, Min-Jung
    Lee, Ju Hee
    Jung, Mi-Hyang
    Shin, Jeong-Hun
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 125 (06) : 866 - 873
  • [4] Is direct method of low density lipoprotein cholesterol measurement appropriate for targeting lipid lowering therapy?
    Can, Murat
    Acikgoz, Serefden
    Mungan, Gorkem
    Ugurbas, Ebru
    Ankarali, Handan
    Sumbuloglu, Vildan
    Demirtas, Selda
    Karaca, Levent
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2010, 142 (01) : 105 - 107
  • [5] Reliability of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B measurement
    Contois, John H.
    Warnick, G. Russell
    Sniderman, Allan D.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL LIPIDOLOGY, 2011, 5 (04) : 264 - 272
  • [6] Measurement of cholesterol low-density lipoprotein using three methodologies
    Querales, Marvin
    Elena Cruces, Maria
    Sanchez, Cesar
    Querales, Marisel
    Rojas, Susan
    Sanchez, Lissette
    ACTA BIOQUIMICA CLINICA LATINOAMERICANA, 2012, 46 (01): : 31 - 37
  • [7] Comparison of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level calculated using the modified Martin/Hopkins estimation or the Friedewald formula with direct homogeneous assay measured low-density lipoprotein cholesterol
    Reiber, Istvan
    Mark, Laszlo
    Paragh, Gyorgy
    Toth, Peter
    ARCHIVES OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 18 (03) : 577 - 586
  • [8] Low density lipoprotein-cholesterol variability in patients with type 2 diabetes taking atorvastatin compared to simvastatin: justification for direct measurement?
    Sathyapalan, T.
    Atkin, S. L.
    Kilpatrick, E. S.
    DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2010, 12 (06) : 540 - 544
  • [9] COMPARATIVE DETERMINATIONS OF LOW-DENSITY-LIPOPROTEIN-CHOLESTEROL
    SANCHEZMUNIZ, FJ
    CUESTA, C
    SANFELIX, B
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE FISIOLOGIA, 1992, 48 (04): : 271 - 276
  • [10] A multicentre analysis of four low-density lipoprotein cholesterol direct assays in samples with extreme high-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations
    Timon-Zapata, Jesus
    Jose Laserna-Mendieta, Emilio
    Francisco Saenz-Mateos, Luis
    Ruiz-Trujillo, Lucia
    Arpa-Fernandez, Ana
    Javier Palomino-Munoz, Teodoro
    Filar Loeches-Jimenez, Maria
    Gomez-Serranillos, Manuel
    CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2014, 430 : 71 - 76