The role of context in contextualism

被引：3
作者：
Montminy, Martin [1 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Oklahoma, Dept Philosophy, Norman, OK 73019 USA
来源：
SYNTHESE | 2013年 / 190卷 / 12期
关键词：
Contextualism; Knowledge; Context; Intentions; Truth conditions;
D O I：
10.1007/s11229-011-9975-8
中图分类号：
N09 [自然科学史]; B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号：
01 ; 0101 ; 010108 ; 060207 ; 060305 ; 0712 ;
摘要：
According to a view widely held by epistemic contextualists, the truth conditions of a knowledge claim depend on features of the context such as the presuppositions, interests and purposes of the conversational participants. Against this view, I defend an intentionalist account, according to which the truth conditions of a knowledge attribution are determined by the speaker's intention. I show that an intentionalist version of contextualism has several advantages over its more widely accepted rival account.
引用
收藏
页码：2341 / 2366
页数：26
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2001, REFERENCE REFLEXIVIT
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1986, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC S
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2004, LITERAL MEANING
[4]   You don't say? [J].
Bach, K .
SYNTHESE, 2001, 128 (1-2) :15-44
[5]   INTENTIONS AND DEMONSTRATIONS [J].
BACH, K .
ANALYSIS, 1992, 52 (03) :140-146
[6]  
Bach K., 2005, SEMANTICS VS PRAGMAT, P15
[7]  
Carston Robyn., 2002, Thoughts and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication
[8]  
Cohen S, 1999, NOUS, P57
[9]  
Cohen Stewart., 1988, PHILOS PERSPECT, V2, P581
[10]   Knowledge claims and context: loose use [J].
Davis, Wayne A. .
PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES, 2007, 132 (03) :395-438
1234