Minimally invasive PCNL in patients with renal pelvic and calyceal stones

被引:162
|
作者
Lahme, S
Bichler, KH
Strohmaier, WL
Götz, T
机构
[1] Univ Tubingen, Dept Urol, D-72076 Tubingen, Germany
[2] Klinikum Coburg, Dept Urol & Pediat Urol, Coburg, Germany
关键词
urolithiasis; percutaneous nephrolithotomy; calyceal stones;
D O I
10.1159/000049847
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Stones of the renal pelvis can be treated either by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) or percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). As a low-risk procedure with a longer treatment period, SWL often leads to persistent residual stone fragments, whereas conventional PCNL achieves a higher stone-free rate and allows a shorter treatment period albeit with a somewhat higher surgical risk. To reduce the invasiveness of conventional PCNL, the application of a miniaturised instrument for PCNL (MPCNL) was evaluated. For MPCNL a rigid nephroscope with a calibre of 12 F was developed and used in 19 patients. After puncture of the kidney under ultrasound control and single-step dilatation, a 15 F Amplatz sheath was placed. Data on the stone size and location, stone-free rate, blood transfusions, operating time and complications were recorded. In all patients, the part of the kidney afflicted by the stone was successfully punctured. On average, retreatment rate was 0.7. The mean stone size was 2.4 cm(2). The average operating time was 99.2 min. In every case, the absence of residual stones was confirmed radiologically and nephroscopically. Hemorrhages requiring a blood transfusion did not occur. A febrile pyelonephritis occurred as a postoperative complication in one patient (= 5.3%). MPCNL represents an alternative to SWL for renal calculi with a size from 1 to 2 cm located in the renal pelvis and calices, especially the lower calix. The advantages are the short treatment time, the high stone-free rate and the accessibility of lower pole stones which are less amenable to SWL. MPCNL is not suitable for large concrements since the limited sheath diameter would increase the operating time. Due to this limitation, MPCNL represents an extension of the indication for conventional PCNL that it can in no way replace. Copyright (C) 2001 S. Karger AG, Basel.
引用
收藏
页码:619 / 624
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] 'Mini, ultra, micro' - nomenclature and cost of these new minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) techniques
    Wright, Anna
    Rukin, Nick
    Smith, Daron
    De la Rosette, Jean
    Somani, Bhaskar K.
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN UROLOGY, 2016, 8 (02) : 142 - 146
  • [42] Safety and Efficacy of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in Pediatric Patients with Deranged Renal Functions
    Soomro, Anees Ur Rehman
    Azad, Muhammad Murtaza
    Khalid, Faraz
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2020, 14 (03): : 1742 - 1745
  • [43] A systematic review and meta-analysis of minimally invasive vs. standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the surgical management of renal stones
    Jiao, Binbin
    Luo, Zhenkai
    Huang, Tao
    Zhang, Guan
    Yu, Jiang
    EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE, 2021, 21 (03)
  • [44] REPLY TO THE AUTHORS: Re: Endourologic strategies for a minimally invasive management of urinary tract stones in patients with urinary diversion
    Zhong, FangLing
    Alberto, Gurioli
    Chen, GuangMing
    Zhu, Wei
    Tang, FuCai
    Zeng, Guohua
    Lei, Ming
    INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL, 2018, 44 (04): : 848 - 849
  • [45] Minimally Invasive Surgery for the Treatment of Ureteric Stones - State-of-the-Art Review
    Bhanot, Radhika
    Jones, Patrick
    Somani, Bhaskar
    RESEARCH AND REPORTS IN UROLOGY, 2021, 13 : 227 - 236
  • [46] Correlation analysis between renal anatomical factors and residual stones after an ultrasound-guided PCNL
    Zhu, Shusheng
    Fan, Yanpeng
    Hu, Xia
    Shao, Mingming
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2023, 10
  • [47] Clinical characteristics of surgically managed patients with asymptomatic renal stones : Comparison of patients with symptomatic renal stones
    Park, Dong Jin
    Kim, Bum Soo
    Kwon, Soon Oh
    Chung, Jae-Wook
    Ha, Yun-Sok
    Choi, Seock Hwan
    Kim, Hyun Tae
    Yoo, Eun Sang
    INVESTIGATIVE AND CLINICAL UROLOGY, 2023, 64 (02) : 161 - 167
  • [48] Ultra-mini PCNL versus flexible ureteroscopy: a matched analysis of analgesic consumption and treatment-related patient satisfaction in patients with renal stones 10–35 mm
    Konrad Wilhelm
    Simon Hein
    Fabian Adams
    Daniel Schlager
    Arkadiusz Miernik
    Martin Schoenthaler
    World Journal of Urology, 2015, 33 : 2131 - 2136
  • [49] A prospective, single-centered, cohort study comparing the treatment of renal stones by following PCNL types: Standard, tubeless & totally tubeless
    Ahmad, Mumtaz
    Mumtaz, Hassan
    Hussain, Hassan-ul
    Sarfraz, Sharjeel
    Rahat, Manahil
    Mumtaz, Shamim
    ANNALS OF MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2022, 80
  • [50] Evaluation of renal function in patients with a main renal stone larger than 1 cm and perioperative renal functional change in minimally invasive renal stone surgery: a prospective, observational study
    Piao, Songzhe
    Park, Juhyun
    Son, Hwancheol
    Jeong, Hyeon
    Cho, Sung Yong
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 34 (05) : 725 - 732