Minimally invasive PCNL in patients with renal pelvic and calyceal stones

被引:162
|
作者
Lahme, S
Bichler, KH
Strohmaier, WL
Götz, T
机构
[1] Univ Tubingen, Dept Urol, D-72076 Tubingen, Germany
[2] Klinikum Coburg, Dept Urol & Pediat Urol, Coburg, Germany
关键词
urolithiasis; percutaneous nephrolithotomy; calyceal stones;
D O I
10.1159/000049847
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Stones of the renal pelvis can be treated either by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) or percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). As a low-risk procedure with a longer treatment period, SWL often leads to persistent residual stone fragments, whereas conventional PCNL achieves a higher stone-free rate and allows a shorter treatment period albeit with a somewhat higher surgical risk. To reduce the invasiveness of conventional PCNL, the application of a miniaturised instrument for PCNL (MPCNL) was evaluated. For MPCNL a rigid nephroscope with a calibre of 12 F was developed and used in 19 patients. After puncture of the kidney under ultrasound control and single-step dilatation, a 15 F Amplatz sheath was placed. Data on the stone size and location, stone-free rate, blood transfusions, operating time and complications were recorded. In all patients, the part of the kidney afflicted by the stone was successfully punctured. On average, retreatment rate was 0.7. The mean stone size was 2.4 cm(2). The average operating time was 99.2 min. In every case, the absence of residual stones was confirmed radiologically and nephroscopically. Hemorrhages requiring a blood transfusion did not occur. A febrile pyelonephritis occurred as a postoperative complication in one patient (= 5.3%). MPCNL represents an alternative to SWL for renal calculi with a size from 1 to 2 cm located in the renal pelvis and calices, especially the lower calix. The advantages are the short treatment time, the high stone-free rate and the accessibility of lower pole stones which are less amenable to SWL. MPCNL is not suitable for large concrements since the limited sheath diameter would increase the operating time. Due to this limitation, MPCNL represents an extension of the indication for conventional PCNL that it can in no way replace. Copyright (C) 2001 S. Karger AG, Basel.
引用
收藏
页码:619 / 624
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prospective randomized comparison between superior calyceal access versus inferior calyceal access in PCNL for inferior calyceal stones with or without pelvic stones
    Singh, Vishwajeet
    Garg, Yogesh
    Sharma, Kuldeep
    Sinha, Rahul Janak
    Gupta, Saurabh
    UROLITHIASIS, 2016, 44 (02) : 161 - 165
  • [2] Prospective randomized comparison between superior calyceal access versus inferior calyceal access in PCNL for inferior calyceal stones with or without pelvic stones
    Vishwajeet Singh
    Yogesh Garg
    Kuldeep Sharma
    Rahul Janak Sinha
    Saurabh Gupta
    Urolithiasis, 2016, 44 : 161 - 165
  • [3] MINIMALLY INVASIVE PCNL - MIP
    Zanetti, Stefano Paolo
    Boeri, Luca
    Gallioli, Andrea
    Talso, Michele
    Montanari, Emanuele
    ARCHIVOS ESPANOLES DE UROLOGIA, 2017, 70 (01): : 226 - 234
  • [4] Minimally invasive PCNL (mini-perc). Alternative treatment modality or replacement of conventional PCNL?
    Lahme, S.
    Zimmermanns, V.
    Hochmuth, A.
    Janitzki, V.
    UROLOGE, 2008, 47 (05): : 563 - 568
  • [5] OUTCOMES OF DIFFERENT MINIMALLY INVASIVE TECHNIQUES IN LOWER CALYCEAL STONES OF 1 TO 2 CENTIMETERS: A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED STUDY
    Yavuz, Abdulmecit
    Kilinc, Muhammet Fatih
    Boyar, Goksel
    ARCHIVOS ESPANOLES DE UROLOGIA, 2020, 73 (04): : 307 - 315
  • [6] Minimally invasive surgery for pediatric renal and ureteric stones: A therapeutic update
    Peng, Tao
    Zhong, Hongcai
    Hu, Baohui
    Zhao, Shankun
    FRONTIERS IN PEDIATRICS, 2022, 10
  • [7] Management of multiple stones in a single session using minimally invasive methods in infants with renal failure: renal salvage
    Ozturk, Ahmet
    Guven, Selcuk
    Piskin, Mesut
    Kilinc, Mehmet
    Celik, Jale
    Arslan, Mehmet
    INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2012, 44 (01) : 3 - 6
  • [8] Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL): Techniques and outcomes
    Kallidonis, Panagiotis
    Tsaturyan, Arman
    Lattarulo, Marco
    Liatsikos, Evangelos
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 46 : S58 - S63
  • [9] The influence of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy on renal pelvic pressure in vivo
    Guohua, Zeng
    Wen, Zhong
    Xun, Li
    Wenzhong, Chen
    Yongzhong, He
    Zhaohui, He
    Ming, Lei
    Jun, Wu Ka
    SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2007, 17 (04) : 307 - 310
  • [10] Minimal-invasive PCNL (Mini-Perc)Alternative oder Ersatz für konventionelle PCNL?Minimally invasive PCNL (mini-perc)Alternative treatment modality or replacement of conventional PCNL?
    S. Lahme
    V. Zimmermanns
    A. Hochmuth
    V. Janitzki
    Der Urologe, 2008, 47 : 563 - 568