Patient Experiences of Recovery After Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation: A Qualitative Study

被引:5
|
作者
Toonstra, Jenny L. [1 ]
Howell, Dana [2 ]
English, Robert A. [3 ]
Lattermann, Christian [4 ]
Mattacola, Carl G. [5 ]
机构
[1] Salisbury Univ, Dept Hlth & Sport Sci, Athlet Training Educ Program, Salisbury, MD USA
[2] Eastern Kentucky Univ, Dept Occupat Sci & Occupat Therapy, Richmond, KY 40475 USA
[3] Univ Kentucky, Div Phys Therapy, Lexington, KY 40506 USA
[4] Univ Kentucky, Dept Orthopaed Surg & Sports Med, Lexington, KY 40506 USA
[5] Univ Kentucky, Div Athlet Training, Lexington, KY 40506 USA
关键词
cartilage; knee joint; rehabilitation; patient expectations; qualitative study; SPORTS-INJURY REHABILITATION; ARTICULAR-CARTILAGE REPAIR; KNEE-JOINT; DEFECTS; ADHERENCE; TRANSPLANTATION; OUTCOMES; SCIENCE; CARE;
D O I
10.4085/1062-6050-51.12.12
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
Context: The recovery process after autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) can be challenging for patients and clinicians alike due to significant functional limitations and a lengthy healing time. Understanding patients' experiences during the recovery process may assist clinicians in providing more individualized care. Objective: To explore and describe patients' experiences during the recovery process after ACI. Design: Qualitative study. Setting: Orthopaedic clinic. Patients or Other Participants: Participants from a single orthopaedic practice who had undergone ACI within the previous 12 months were purposefully selected. Data Collection and Analysis: Volunteers participated in 1-on-1 semistructured interviews to describe their recovery experiences after ACI. Data were analyzed using the process of horizontalization. Results: Seven patients (2 men, 5 women; age = 40.7 +/- 7.5 years, time from surgery = 8.7 +/- 4.2 months) participated. Four themes and 6 subthemes emerged from the data and suggested that the recovery process is a lengthy and emotional experience. Therapy provides optimism for the future but requires a collaborative effort among the patient, surgeon, rehabilitation provider, and patient's caregiver(s). Furthermore, patients expressed frustration that their expectations for recovery did not match the reality of the process, including greater dependence on caregivers than expected. Conclusions: Patients' expectations should be elicited before surgery and managed throughout the recovery process. Providing preoperative patient and caregiver education and encouraging preoperative rehabilitation can assist in managing expectations. Establishing realistic goals and expectations may improve rehabilitation adherence, encourage optimism for recovery, and improve outcomes in the long term.
引用
收藏
页码:1028 / 1036
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Long-term T2 and Qualitative MRI Morphology After First-Generation Knee Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation Cartilage Ultrastructure Is Not Correlated to Clinical or Qualitative MRI Outcome
    Salzmann, Gian M.
    Erdle, Benjamin
    Porichis, Stella
    Uhl, Markus
    Ghanem, Nadir
    Schmal, Hagen
    Kubosch, David
    Suedkamp, Norbert P.
    Niemeyer, Philipp
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2014, 42 (08) : 1832 - 1840
  • [42] Malalignment and cartilage lesions in the patellofemoral joint treated with autologous chondrocyte implantation
    Vasiliadis, Haris S.
    Lindahl, Anders
    Georgoulis, Anastasios D.
    Peterson, Lars
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2011, 19 (03) : 452 - 457
  • [43] Matrix-Induced Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation Versus Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation of the Knee A Retrospective Comparison
    Manjunath, Amit K.
    Fried, Jordan W.
    Alaia, Erin F.
    Lin, Charles C.
    Hurley, Eoghan T.
    Meislin, Robert J.
    Jazrawi, Laith M.
    Strauss, Eric J.
    BULLETIN OF THE HOSPITAL FOR JOINT DISEASES, 2024, 82 (02): : 118 - 123
  • [44] Improved Outcomes With Combined Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation and Patellofemoral Osteotomy Versus Isolated Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation
    Trinh, Thai Q.
    Harris, Joshua D.
    Siston, Robert A.
    Flanigan, David C.
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2013, 29 (03) : 566 - 574
  • [45] A Prospective Clinical and Radiological Evaluation at 5 Years After Arthroscopic Matrix-Induced Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation
    Ebert, Jay R.
    Fallon, Michael
    Wood, David J.
    Janes, Gregory C.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2017, 45 (01) : 59 - 69
  • [46] Assessment of Cartilage Growth After Biopsy of Osteochondral Loose Bodies in Adolescent Knees for Use in Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation
    Robinson, Sean
    Kramer, Jonathan
    Shelton, Trevor
    Merriman, Jarrad
    Haus, Brian
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS, 2020, 40 (03) : 110 - 113
  • [47] Sporting Activity Is Reduced 11 Years After First-Generation Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation in the Knee Joint
    Erdle, Benjamin
    Herrmann, Simon
    Porichis, Stella
    Uhl, Markus
    Ghanem, Nadir
    Schmal, Hagen
    Suedkamp, Norbert
    Niemeyer, Philipp
    Salzmann, Gian M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2017, 45 (12) : 2762 - 2773
  • [48] Evaluation of the Clinical Outcomes of Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation in the Management of Chondral Lesions of the Knee after 10+Years
    Simurda, J.
    Valis, P.
    Rouchal, M.
    Novak, J.
    Otasevic, T.
    ACTA CHIRURGIAE ORTHOPAEDICAE ET TRAUMATOLOGIAE CECHOSLOVACA, 2023, 90 (06) : 369 - 374
  • [49] Factors Predictive of Outcome 5 Years After Matrix-Induced Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation in the Tibiofemoral Joint
    Ebert, Jay R.
    Smith, Anne
    Edwards, Peter K.
    Hambly, Karen
    Wood, David J.
    Ackland, Timothy R.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2013, 41 (06) : 1245 - 1254
  • [50] Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation as a Two Stage Approach (MACI)
    Manjunath, Amit K.
    Hurley, Eoghan T.
    Strauss, Eric J.
    OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES IN SPORTS MEDICINE, 2020, 28 (04)