Small sample size is not the real problem

被引：38

作者：

Bacchetti, Peter ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA

来源：

NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE | 2013年 / 14卷 / 08期

关键词：

POWER;

D O I：

10.1038/nrn3475-c3

中图分类号：

Q189 [神经科学];

学科分类号：

071006 ;

摘要：

引用

页码：585 / 585

页数：1

共 10 条

[1]

Bacchetti P, 2005, AM J EPIDEMIOL, V161, P105, DOI 10.1093/aje/kwi014

[2] Simple, defensible sample sizes based on cost efficiency [J].

Bacchetti, Peter ;

McCulloch, Charles E. ;

Segal, Mark R. .

BIOMETRICS, 2008, 64 (02) :577-585

[3] Breaking Free of Sample Size Dogma to Perform Innovative Translational Research [J].

Bacchetti, Peter ;

Deeks, Steven G. ;

McCune, Joseph M. .

SCIENCE TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2011, 3 (87)

[4] Current sample size conventions: Flaws, harms, and alternatives [J].

Bacchetti, Peter .

BMC MEDICINE, 2010, 8

[5] Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience [J].

Button, Katherine S. ;

Ioannidis, John P. A. ;

Mokrysz, Claire ;

Nosek, Brian A. ;

Flint, Jonathan ;

Robinson, Emma S. J. ;

Munafo, Marcus R. .

NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, 14 (05) :365-376

[6] THE USE OF PREDICTED CONFIDENCE-INTERVALS WHEN PLANNING EXPERIMENTS AND THE MISUSE OF POWER WHEN INTERPRETING RESULTS [J].

GOODMAN, SN ;

BERLIN, JA .

ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1994, 121 (03) :200-206

[7] The abuse of power: The pervasive fallacy of power calculations for data analysis [J].

Hoenig, JM ;

Heisey, DM .

AMERICAN STATISTICIAN, 2001, 55 (01) :19-24

[8] Why most published research findings are false [J].

Ioannidis, JPA .

PLOS MEDICINE, 2005, 2 (08) :696-701

[9] THE EFFECT OF SAMPLE-SIZE ON THE MEANING OF SIGNIFICANCE TESTS [J].

ROYALL, RM .

AMERICAN STATISTICIAN, 1986, 40 (04) :313-315

[10] Power is indeed irrelevant in interpreting completed studies [J].

Senn, SJ .

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 325 (7375) :1304-1304

← 1 →