Small sample size is not the real problem

被引：38
作者：
Bacchetti, Peter [1 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
来源：
NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE | 2013年 / 14卷 / 08期
关键词：
POWER;
D O I：
10.1038/nrn3475-c3
中图分类号：
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号：
071006 ;
摘要：
引用
收藏
页码：585 / 585
页数：1
相关论文
共 10 条
  • [1] Bacchetti P, 2005, AM J EPIDEMIOL, V161, P105, DOI 10.1093/aje/kwi014
  • [2] Simple, defensible sample sizes based on cost efficiency
    Bacchetti, Peter
    McCulloch, Charles E.
    Segal, Mark R.
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 2008, 64 (02) : 577 - 585
  • [3] Breaking Free of Sample Size Dogma to Perform Innovative Translational Research
    Bacchetti, Peter
    Deeks, Steven G.
    McCune, Joseph M.
    [J]. SCIENCE TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2011, 3 (87)
  • [4] Current sample size conventions: Flaws, harms, and alternatives
    Bacchetti, Peter
    [J]. BMC MEDICINE, 2010, 8
  • [5] Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience
    Button, Katherine S.
    Ioannidis, John P. A.
    Mokrysz, Claire
    Nosek, Brian A.
    Flint, Jonathan
    Robinson, Emma S. J.
    Munafo, Marcus R.
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, 14 (05) : 365 - 376
  • [6] THE USE OF PREDICTED CONFIDENCE-INTERVALS WHEN PLANNING EXPERIMENTS AND THE MISUSE OF POWER WHEN INTERPRETING RESULTS
    GOODMAN, SN
    BERLIN, JA
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1994, 121 (03) : 200 - 206
  • [7] The abuse of power: The pervasive fallacy of power calculations for data analysis
    Hoenig, JM
    Heisey, DM
    [J]. AMERICAN STATISTICIAN, 2001, 55 (01) : 19 - 24
  • [8] Why most published research findings are false
    Ioannidis, JPA
    [J]. PLOS MEDICINE, 2005, 2 (08) : 696 - 701
  • [9] THE EFFECT OF SAMPLE-SIZE ON THE MEANING OF SIGNIFICANCE TESTS
    ROYALL, RM
    [J]. AMERICAN STATISTICIAN, 1986, 40 (04) : 313 - 315
  • [10] Power is indeed irrelevant in interpreting completed studies
    Senn, SJ
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 325 (7375): : 1304 - 1304
1