Pain process of patients with cardiac surgerySemantic annotation of electronic patient record data

被引:1
|
作者
Heikkila, Kristiina [1 ]
Axelin, Anna [1 ]
Peltonen, Laura-Maria [1 ,2 ]
Heimonen, Juho [3 ]
Anttila, Pauliina [3 ]
Viljanen, Timo [3 ]
Salakoski, Tapio [3 ]
Salantera, Sanna [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Turku, Dept Nursing Sci, Turku, Finland
[2] Turku Univ Hosp, Hosp Dist Southwest Finland, Turku, Finland
[3] Univ Turku, Dept Future Technol, Turku, Finland
关键词
cardio-thoracic nursing; chest pain; documentation; pain assessment; postoperative pain; qualitative study; surgery; MANAGEMENT; CARE; DOCUMENTATION; SATISFACTION; EXPERIENCE; SURGERY; QUALITY; TOUCH; UNITS;
D O I
10.1111/jocn.14752
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Aims and objectivesTo describe and compare the pain process of the patients' with cardiac surgery through nurses' and physicians' documentations in the electronic patient records. BackgroundPostoperative pain assessment and management should be documented regularly, to ensure optimal pain care process for patients. Despite availability of evidence-based guidelines, pain assessment and documentation remain inadequate. DesignA retrospective patients' record review. MethodsThe original data consisted of the electronic patient records of 26,922 patients with a diagnosed heart disease. A total of 1,818 care episodes of patients with cardiac surgery were selected from the data. We used random sampling to obtain 280 care episodes for annotation. These 280 care episodes contained 2,156 physician reports and 1,327days of nursing notes. We developed an annotation manual and schema, and then, we manually conducted semantic annotation on care episodes, using the Brat annotation tool. We analysed the annotation units using thematic analysis. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research guideline was followed in reporting where appropriate in this study design. ResultsWe discovered expressions of six different aspects of pain process: (a) cause, (b) situation, (c) features, (d) consequences, (e) actions and (f) outcomes. We determined that five of the aspects existed chronologically. However, the features of pain were simultaneously existing. They indicated the location, quality, intensity, and temporality of the pain and they were present in every phase of the patient's pain process. Cardiac and postoperative pain documentations differed from each other in used expressions and in the quantity and quality of descriptions. ConclusionWe could construct a comprehensive pain process of the patients with cardiac surgery from several electronic patient records. The challenge remains how to support systematic documentation in each patient. Relevance to clinical practiceThe study provides knowledge and guidance of pain process aspects that can be used to achieve an effective pain assessment and more comprehensive documentation.
引用
收藏
页码:1555 / 1567
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Patient generated health data and electronic health record integration in oncologic surgery: A call for artificial intelligence and machine learning
    Melstrom, Laleh G.
    Rodin, Andrei S.
    Rossi, Lorenzo A.
    Fu, Paul, Jr.
    Fong, Yuman
    Sun, Virginia
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 123 (01) : 52 - 60
  • [22] A novel approach to leveraging electronic health record data to enhance pediatric surgical quality improvement bundle process compliance
    Fisher, Jason C.
    Godfried, David H.
    Lighter-Fisher, Jennifer
    Pratko, Joseph
    Sheldon, Mary Ellen
    Diago, Thelma
    Kuenzler, Keith A.
    Tomita, Sandra S.
    Ginsburg, Howard B.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2016, 51 (06) : 1030 - 1033
  • [23] Using electronic health records data to identify patients with chronic pain in a primary care setting
    Tian, Terrence Y.
    Zlateva, Ianita
    Anderson, Daren R.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2013, 20 (E2) : E275 - E280
  • [24] Deriving a Sophisticated Clinical Pathway Based on Patient Conditions from Electronic Health Record Data
    Lim, Jungeun
    Kim, Kidong
    Cho, Minsu
    Baek, Hyunyoung
    Kim, Seok
    Hwang, Hee
    Yoo, Sooyoung
    Song, Minseok
    PROCESS MINING WORKSHOPS, ICPM 2020 INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOPS, 2021, 406 : 356 - 367
  • [25] Capturing the patients' voices: Planning for patient-centered electronic health record use
    Asan, Onur
    Tyszka, Jeanne
    Fletcher, Kathlyn E.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2016, 95 : 1 - 7
  • [26] Using electronic health record data to evaluate preventive service utilization among uninsured safety net patients
    Heintzman, John
    Marino, Miguel
    Hoopes, Megan
    Bailey, Steffani
    Gold, Rachel
    Crawford, Courtney
    Cowburn, Stuart
    O'Malley, Jean
    Nelson, Christine
    DeVoe, Jennifer E.
    PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2014, 67 : 306 - 310
  • [27] Challenges with Patient Adoption of Automated Integration of Blood Glucose Meter Data in the Electronic Health Record
    Weatherly, Jake
    Kishnani, Saniya
    Aye, Tandy
    DIABETES TECHNOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2019, 21 (11) : 671 - 674
  • [28] Patient-generated health data and electronic health record integration: protocol for a scoping review
    Tiase, Victoria L.
    Hull, William
    McFarland, Mary M.
    Sward, Katherine A.
    Del Fiol, Guilherme
    Staes, Catherine
    Weir, Charlene
    Cummins, Mollie R.
    BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (12):
  • [29] Leveraging Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement via the Electronic Health Record to Connect Patients with Cancer to Smoking Cessation Treatment
    May, Julia R.
    Klass, Elizabeth
    Davis, Kristina
    Pearman, Timothy
    Rittmeyer, Steven
    Kircher, Sheetal
    Hitsman, Brian
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (14) : 1 - 13
  • [30] Comparison of Patient Data in Parallel Records: The Sign-out Sheet and the Electronic Medical Record
    Perez, Thomas Ted
    Bass, Ellen J.
    Helms, Adam
    Plews-Ogan, Margaret
    IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN AND CYBERNETICS (SMC 2010), 2010,