The effects of using Merrill's first principles of instruction on learning and satisfaction in MOOC

被引:15
作者
Badali, Mehdi [1 ]
Hatami, Javad [1 ]
Farrokhnia, Mohammadreza [2 ]
Noroozi, Omid [2 ]
机构
[1] Tarbiat Modares Univ, Dept Educ, Fac Humanities, Tehran, Iran
[2] Wageningen Univ & Res, Educ & Learning Sci Grp, Fac Social Sci, Wageningen, Netherlands
关键词
MOOC; Merrill's principles of instruction; learning; online learning; satisfaction; OPEN ONLINE COURSES; QUALITY; UNIVERSITY; EDUCATION; STUDENTS; OUTCOMES; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1080/14703297.2020.1813187
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This study investigates the effects of a developed MOOC based on Merrill's principles of instruction on participants' learning outcomes and satisfaction. A pre-test-post-test with a control group design was used in this study. In total, 335 participants were assigned into experimental (using Merrill's principles of instruction) and control group (using the conventional method). However, 291 subjects (143 participants from the experimental and 148 participants from the control group condition) remained in the course up to the last session, and only 200 participants (100 participants per each condition) filled in the surveys. The results were in favour of participants in the experimental condition both in terms of learning and satisfaction compared to the participants in the control group condition. By implementing Merrill's principles of instruction in designing MOOCs and actively engaging participants in a problem-centred learning process, their learning outcomes and satisfaction can be further improved.
引用
收藏
页码:216 / 225
页数:10
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   Factors affecting student dropout in MOOCs: a cause and effect decision-making model [J].
Aldowah, Hanan ;
Al-Samarraie, Hosam ;
Alzahrani, Ahmed Ibrahim ;
Alalwan, Nasser .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTING IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2020, 32 (02) :429-454
[2]  
Alharbi H., 2014, THANNUAL
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2011, THESIS
[4]  
Badali M., 2018, Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences, DOI [DOI 10.5812/IJVLMS.81623, 10.5812/ijvlms.81623]
[5]  
Chanchalor S., 2004, WORLD T ENG TECHNOLO, V3, P75
[6]  
Clark R. E., 2005, Journal of Educational Computing Research, V32, P209, DOI 10.2190/7LRM-3BR2-44GW-9QQY
[7]   Making Sense of MOOCs: Musings in a Maze of Myth, Paradox and Possibility [J].
Daniel, John .
JOURNAL OF INTERACTIVE MEDIA IN EDUCATION, 2012, (03)
[8]   Delving into learner autonomy in an EFL MOOC in China: a case study [J].
Ding, Yan ;
Shen, Huizhong .
COMPUTER ASSISTED LANGUAGE LEARNING, 2022, 35 (03) :247-269
[9]  
Donohue T.L., 1997, EDUCATION, V118, P237
[10]  
EDWARDS JE, 1982, EDUC PSYCHOL MEAS, V42, P1149, DOI 10.1177/001316448204200421