Species-habitat networks: A tool to improve landscape management for conservation

被引:52
作者
Marini, Lorenzo [1 ]
Bartomeus, Ignasi [2 ]
Rader, Romina [3 ]
Lami, Francesco [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Padua, DAFNAE, Padua, Italy
[2] CSIC, EBD, Dept Ecol Integrat, Seville, Spain
[3] Univ New England, Sch Environm & Rural Sci, Ecosyst Management, Armidale, NSW, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
bipartite networks; community stability; conservation prioritization; fragmentation; habitat preference; landscape composition; landscape configuration; land-use change; ECOLOGICAL NETWORKS; BIODIVERSITY; FRAMEWORK; PATTERNS;
D O I
10.1111/1365-2664.13337
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Land-use change is reshaping terrestrial ecosystems world-wide and is recognized as a key driver of biodiversity loss with negative consequences on ecosystem functioning. Understanding how species use resources across landscapes is essential for the design of effective management strategies. Despite recent advances in network ecology, there is still a gap between theory and applied ecological science, and we lack the information to manage entire landscapes to maximize biodiversity conservation and ecosystem service delivery. While several pioneering approaches have tried to link ecological networks and conservation science, applied ecologists still struggle to incorporate these models into research due to their inherent complexity. We propose the application of bipartite networks principles to create species-habitat networks. This approach explicitly links multiple species and habitat resources, provides tools to estimate the importance of particular species or specific habitat in a given landscape, and quantifies emerging properties of entire habitat networks. Most existing metrics used to study properties of bipartite ecological networks can easily be adapted to investigate species-habitat relationships. The tool use is relatively simple and does not require advanced computational expertise.Synthesis and applications. One of the biggest challenges in applied ecology is managing multiple habitats for the effective conservation of multiple species. One key advantage of this proposed approach is that the scale of the derived ecological information could match the scale of landscape management interventions. The versatility, visualization power and ease of interpretation of these networks will enable application of the species-habitat network concept to a wide array of real-world problems, such as multispecies conservation, habitat restoration, ecosystem services management or invasion ecology. In particular, species-habitat networks could be applied to identify optimal landscape compositions and configurations to design effective interventions at the landscape scale. This approach also enables the detection of emerging network properties that could also be used to test the effects of large-scale drivers of global change upon ecosystem structure and stability. One of the biggest challenges in applied ecology is managing multiple habitats for the effective conservation of multiple species. One key advantage of this proposed approach is that the scale of the derived ecological information could match the scale of landscape management interventions. The versatility, visualization power and ease of interpretation of these networks will enable application of the species-habitat network concept to a wide array of real-world problems, such as multispecies conservation, habitat restoration, ecosystem services management or invasion ecology. In particular, species-habitat networks could be applied to identify optimal landscape compositions and configurations to design effective interventions at the landscape scale. This approach also enables the detection of emerging network properties that could also be used to test the effects of large-scale drivers of global change upon ecosystem structure and stability.
引用
收藏
页码:923 / 928
页数:6
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Applying network theory to prioritize multispecies habitat networks that are robust to climate and land-use change [J].
Albert, Cecile H. ;
Rayfield, Bronwyn ;
Dumitru, Maria ;
Gonzalez, Andrew .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2017, 31 (06) :1383-1396
[2]   Individual dispersal, landscape connectivity and ecological networks [J].
Baguette, Michel ;
Blanchet, Simon ;
Legrand, Delphine ;
Stevens, Virginie M. ;
Turlure, Camille .
BIOLOGICAL REVIEWS, 2013, 88 (02) :310-326
[3]   Asymmetric coevolutionary networks facilitate biodiversity maintenance [J].
Bascompte, J ;
Jordano, P ;
Olesen, JM .
SCIENCE, 2006, 312 (5772) :431-433
[4]   Plant-animal mutualistic networks: The architecture of biodiversity [J].
Bascompte, Jordi ;
Jordano, Pedro .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECOLOGY EVOLUTION AND SYSTEMATICS, 2007, 38 :567-593
[5]   Partitioning the turnover and nestedness components of beta diversity [J].
Baselga, Andres .
GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY, 2010, 19 (01) :134-143
[6]  
Bluethgen Nico, 2006, BMC Ecology, V6, P9, DOI 10.1186/1472-6785-6-9
[7]   Plant-Pollinator Interactions over 120 Years: Loss of Species, Co-Occurrence, and Function [J].
Burkle, Laura A. ;
Marlin, John C. ;
Knight, Tiffany M. .
SCIENCE, 2013, 339 (6127) :1611-1615
[8]   A hierarchical framework for investigating epiphyte assemblages: networks, meta-communities, and scale [J].
Burns, K. C. ;
Zotz, G. .
ECOLOGY, 2010, 91 (02) :377-385
[9]  
Dormann C.F., 2009, OPEN ECOL J, V2, P7, DOI [10.2174/1874213000902010007, DOI 10.2174/1874213000902010007]
[10]   Identifying Causes of Patterns in Ecological Networks: Opportunities and Limitations [J].
Dormann, Carsten F. ;
Fruend, Jochen ;
Martin Schaefer, H. .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECOLOGY, EVOLUTION, AND SYSTEMATICS, VOL 48, 2017, 48 :559-584