Boosting imaging defined dominant prostatic tumors: A systematic review

被引:101
作者
Bauman, Glenn [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Haider, Masoom [4 ,5 ]
Van der Heide, Uulke A. [6 ]
Menard, Cynthia [5 ,7 ]
机构
[1] London Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Oncol, London, ON N6A 4L6, Canada
[2] Univ Western Ontario, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada
[3] Western Univ, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Med Imaging, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Univ Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
[6] Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hosp NKI AVL, Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Radiotherapy, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[7] Princess Margaret Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
Prostate; DIL; Boost; GTV; MRI; PET; SPECT; INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY; SIMULTANEOUS INTEGRATED BOOST; DOSE-RATE BRACHYTHERAPY; RADIATION-THERAPY; CANCER IMPLICATIONS; PENDETIDE PROSTASCINT; MULTIPARAMETRIC MRI; PET-CT; ESCALATION; LOCALIZATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.radonc.2013.04.027
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction: Dominant cancer foci within the prostate are associated with sites of local recurrence post radiotherapy. In this systematic review we sought to address the question: "what is the clinical evidence to support differential boosting to an imaging defined GTV volume within the prostate when delivered by external beam or brachytherapy". Materials and methods: A systematic review was conducted to identify clinical series reporting the use of radiation boosts to imaging defined GTVs. Results: Thirteen papers describing 11 unique patient series and 833 patients in total were identified. Methods and details of GTV definition and treatment varied substantially between series. GTV boosts were on average 8 Gy (range 3-35 Gy) for external beam, or 150% for brachytherapy (range 130-155%) and GTV volumes were small (<10 ml). Reported toxicity rates were low and may reflect the modest boost doses, small volumes and conservative DVH constraints employed in most studies. Variability in patient populations, study methodologies and outcomes reporting precluded conclusions regarding efficacy. Conclusions: Despite a large cohort of patients treated differential boosts to imaging defined intra-prostatic targets, conclusions regarding optimal techniques and/or efficacy of this approach are elusive, and this approach cannot be considered standard of care. There is a need to build consensus and evidence. Ongoing prospective randomized trials are underway and will help to better define the role of differential prostate boosts based on imaging defined GTVs. (c) 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:274 / 281
页数:8
相关论文
共 61 条
  • [1] Experimental assessments of intrafractional prostate motion on sequential and simultaneous boost to a dominant intraprostatic lesion
    Abdellatif, Ady
    Craig, Jeff
    Jensen, Michael
    Mulligan, Matt
    Mosalaei, Homeira
    Bauman, Glenn
    Chen, Jeff
    Wong, Eugene
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (03) : 1505 - 1517
  • [2] Focal therapy for localised unifocal and multifocal prostate cancer: a prospective development study
    Ahmed, Hashim U.
    Hindley, Richard G.
    Dickinson, Louise
    Freeman, Alex
    Kirkham, Alex P.
    Sahu, Mahua
    Scott, Rebecca
    Allen, Clare
    Van der Meulen, Jan
    Emberton, Mark
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2012, 13 (06) : 622 - 632
  • [3] Transatlantic Consensus Group on active surveillance and focal therapy for prostate cancer
    Ahmed, Hashim U.
    Akin, Oguz
    Coleman, Jonathan A.
    Crane, Sarah
    Emberton, Mark
    Goldenberg, Larry
    Hricak, Hedvig
    Kattan, Mike W.
    Kurhanewicz, John
    Moore, Caroline M.
    Parker, Chris
    Polascik, Thomas J.
    Scardino, Peter
    van As, Nicholas
    Villers, Arnauld
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 109 (11) : 1636 - 1647
  • [4] ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012
    Barentsz, Jelle O.
    Richenberg, Jonathan
    Clements, Richard
    Choyke, Peter
    Verma, Sadhna
    Villeirs, Geert
    Rouviere, Olivier
    Logager, Vibeke
    Futterer, Jurgen J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2012, 22 (04) : 746 - 757
  • [5] 18F-fluorocholine for prostate cancer imaging: a systematic review of the literature
    Bauman, G.
    Belhocine, T.
    Kovacs, M.
    Ward, A.
    Beheshti, M.
    Rachinsky, I.
    [J]. PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2012, 15 (01) : 45 - 55
  • [6] Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Dose Painting for Localized Prostate Cancer Using 11C-choline Positron Emission Tomography Scans
    Chang, Joe H.
    Joon, Daryl Lim
    Lee, Sze Ting
    Gong, Sylvia J.
    Anderson, Nigel J.
    Scott, Andrew M.
    Davis, Ian D.
    Clouston, David
    Bolton, Damien
    Hamilton, Christopher S.
    Khoo, Vincent
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 83 (05): : E691 - E696
  • [7] Histopathological correlation of 11C-choline PET scans for target volume definition in radical prostate radiotherapy
    Chang, Joe H.
    Joon, Daryl Lim
    Lee, Sze Ting
    Gong, Sylvia J.
    Scott, Andrew M.
    Davis, Ian D.
    Clouston, David
    Bolton, Damien
    Hamilton, Christopher S.
    Khoo, Vincent
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2011, 99 (02) : 187 - 192
  • [8] Postradiotherapy prostate biopsies: What do they really mean? Results for 498 patients
    Crook, J
    Malone, S
    Perry, G
    Bahadur, Y
    Robertson, S
    Abdolell, M
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2000, 48 (02): : 355 - 367
  • [9] The magnetic resonance detected intraprostatic lesion in prostate cancer: planning and delivery of intensity-modulated radiotherapy
    De Meerleer, G
    Villeirs, G
    Bral, S
    Paelinck, L
    De Gersem, W
    Dekuyper, P
    De Neve, W
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2005, 75 (03) : 325 - 333
  • [10] Magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging-guided brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer
    DiBiase, SJ
    Hosseinzadeh, K
    Gullapalli, RP
    Jacobs, SC
    Naslund, MJ
    Sklar, GN
    Alexander, RB
    Yu, C
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2002, 52 (02): : 429 - 438