Minimally invasive hepatectomy conversions: an analysis of risk factors and outcomes

被引:25
|
作者
Silva, Jack P. [1 ]
Berger, Nicholas G. [1 ]
Yin, Ziyan [2 ]
Liu, Ying [2 ]
Tsai, Susan [1 ]
Christians, Kathleen K. [1 ]
Clarke, Callisia N. [1 ]
Mogal, Harveshp [1 ]
Gamblin, T. Clark [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Coll Wisconsin, Dept Surg, Div Surg Oncol, 9200 West Wisconsin Ave, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
[2] Med Coll Wisconsin, Dept Radiol, Div Vasc & Intervent Radiol, 8700 W Wisconsin Ave, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
关键词
OPEN LIVER RESECTION; HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA; EXPERIENCE; CIRRHOSIS; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.hpb.2017.06.006
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Surgical approach may influence morbidity following hepatectomy. This study sought to compare outcomes in minimally invasive surgery (MIS), conversion from MIS to open, and planned open hepatectomy patients and analyze factors leading to conversion. Methods: The 2014 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program dataset was queried for patients undergoing hepatectomy. Patients were divided into three cohorts: MIS, open, or conversion. Propensity matching was performed to compare MIS vs. conversion (3: 1) and open vs. conversion (8: 1). The logistic regression model was used to identify odds ratios for conversion. Results: Patients undergoing conversion had a higher transfusion rate (26% vs. 9%, p < 0.001), longer length of stay (5 vs. 3 days, p < 0.001), and higher morbidity (38% vs. 18%, p < 0.001) than MIS patients. Patients who underwent conversion had similar short-term outcomes to those who had planned open procedures. Independent predictors of conversion included hypertension (OR 1.91; 95% CI 1.12-3.26) and right lobectomy (OR 20.23; 95% CI 3.74-109.35). Conclusion: Patients with hypertension and those undergoing right lobectomy had a higher risk of conversion to open procedure. Conversion resulted in higher morbidity and longer length of stay compared to MIS patients, but outcomes were similar to planned open procedures.
引用
收藏
页码:132 / 139
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Matched comparison of outcomes following open and minimally invasive radical prostatectomy for high-risk patients
    Busch, Jonas
    Magheli, Ahmed
    Leva, Natalia
    Hinz, Stefan
    Ferrari, Michelle
    Friedersdorff, Frank
    Fuller, Tom Florian
    Miller, Kurt
    Gonzalgo, Mark L.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 32 (06) : 1411 - 1416
  • [42] Impact of Liver Cirrhosis on Perioperative Outcomes Among Elderly Patients Undergoing Hepatectomy: the Effect of Minimally Invasive Surgery
    Kota Sahara
    Anghela Z. Paredes
    Diamantis I. Tsilimigras
    J. Madison Hyer
    Katiuscha Merath
    Lu Wu
    Rittal Mehta
    Eliza W. Beal
    Susan White
    Itaru Endo
    Timothy M. Pawlik
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2019, 23 : 2346 - 2353
  • [43] Effect of minimally invasive versus open surgery in hepatectomy on postoperative wound complications in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: A meta-analysis
    Zhang, Junli
    Shi, Meiping
    Ding, Wan
    Duan, Mingda
    Dai, Ziqing
    Chen, Yu
    INTERNATIONAL WOUND JOURNAL, 2023, 20 (10) : 4159 - 4165
  • [44] Outcomes of minimally invasive surgery for phaeochromocytoma
    Meyer-Rochow, Goswin Y.
    Soon, Patsy S. H.
    Delbridge, Leigh W.
    Sywak, Mark S.
    Bambach, Chris P.
    Clifton-Bligh, Roderick J.
    Robinson, Bruce G.
    Sidhu, Stan B.
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2009, 79 (05) : 367 - 370
  • [45] Venous thromboembolism (VTE) after open hepatectomy compared to minimally invasive liver resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lancellotti, Francesco
    Coletta, Diego
    Carino, Nicola de'Liguori
    Satyadas, Thomas
    Jegatheeswaran, Santhalingam
    Maruccio, Martina
    Sheen, Aali J.
    Siriwardena, Ajith K.
    Jamdar, Saurabh
    HPB, 2023, 25 (08) : 872 - 880
  • [46] Robotic liver donor right hepatectomy: A pure, minimally invasive approach
    Magistri, Paolo
    Tarantino, Giuseppe
    Ballarin, Roberto
    Coratti, Andrea
    Di Benedetto, Fabrizio
    LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2017, 23 (06) : 857 - 858
  • [47] Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Hepatectomy: What Is the Best Minimally Invasive Approach?
    Montalti, Roberto
    Patriti, Alberto
    Troisi, Roberto Ivan
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2015, 262 (02)
  • [48] Laparoscopic Versus Open Hepatectomy in Short- and Long-Term Outcomes of the Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients with Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Jiang, Song
    Wang, Zhaoying
    Ou, Mingrui
    Pang, Qing
    Fan, Dongwei
    Cui, Peiyuan
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2019, 29 (05): : 643 - 654
  • [49] Risk Factors for Poor Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive Discectomy: A Post Hoc Subgroup Analysis of 2-Year Follow-up Data
    Chen, Zihao
    He, Lei
    Huang, Lijun
    Liu, Zhongyu
    Dong, Jianwen
    Liu, Bin
    Chen, Ruiqiang
    Zhang, Liangming
    Xie, Peigen
    Rong, Limin
    NEUROSPINE, 2022, 19 (01) : 224 - 235
  • [50] Risk factors for pulmonary morbidities after minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer
    Tomoyuki Uchihara
    Naoya Yoshida
    Yoshifumi Baba
    Taisuke Yagi
    Tasuku Toihata
    Eri Oda
    Daisuke Kuroda
    Tsugio Eto
    Mayuko Ohuchi
    Kenichi Nakamura
    Hiroshi Sawayama
    Koichi Kinoshita
    Masaaki Iwatsuki
    Takatsugu Ishimoto
    Yasuo Sakamoto
    Hideo Baba
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2018, 32 : 2852 - 2858