Minimally invasive hepatectomy conversions: an analysis of risk factors and outcomes

被引:25
|
作者
Silva, Jack P. [1 ]
Berger, Nicholas G. [1 ]
Yin, Ziyan [2 ]
Liu, Ying [2 ]
Tsai, Susan [1 ]
Christians, Kathleen K. [1 ]
Clarke, Callisia N. [1 ]
Mogal, Harveshp [1 ]
Gamblin, T. Clark [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Coll Wisconsin, Dept Surg, Div Surg Oncol, 9200 West Wisconsin Ave, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
[2] Med Coll Wisconsin, Dept Radiol, Div Vasc & Intervent Radiol, 8700 W Wisconsin Ave, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
关键词
OPEN LIVER RESECTION; HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA; EXPERIENCE; CIRRHOSIS; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.hpb.2017.06.006
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Surgical approach may influence morbidity following hepatectomy. This study sought to compare outcomes in minimally invasive surgery (MIS), conversion from MIS to open, and planned open hepatectomy patients and analyze factors leading to conversion. Methods: The 2014 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program dataset was queried for patients undergoing hepatectomy. Patients were divided into three cohorts: MIS, open, or conversion. Propensity matching was performed to compare MIS vs. conversion (3: 1) and open vs. conversion (8: 1). The logistic regression model was used to identify odds ratios for conversion. Results: Patients undergoing conversion had a higher transfusion rate (26% vs. 9%, p < 0.001), longer length of stay (5 vs. 3 days, p < 0.001), and higher morbidity (38% vs. 18%, p < 0.001) than MIS patients. Patients who underwent conversion had similar short-term outcomes to those who had planned open procedures. Independent predictors of conversion included hypertension (OR 1.91; 95% CI 1.12-3.26) and right lobectomy (OR 20.23; 95% CI 3.74-109.35). Conclusion: Patients with hypertension and those undergoing right lobectomy had a higher risk of conversion to open procedure. Conversion resulted in higher morbidity and longer length of stay compared to MIS patients, but outcomes were similar to planned open procedures.
引用
收藏
页码:132 / 139
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Minimally Invasive Surgical Management of Early-Stage Cervical Cancer An Analysis of the Risk Factors of Surgical Complications and of Oncologic Outcomes
    Garabedian, Charles
    Merlot, Benjamin
    Bresson, Lucie
    Tresch, Emmanuelle
    Narducci, Fabrice
    Leblanc, Eric
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2015, 25 (04) : 714 - 721
  • [22] Minimally invasive versus open living donors right hepatectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhao, Xin
    Lei, Zehua
    Gao, Fengwei
    Yang, Jie
    Xie, Qingyun
    Jiang, Kangyi
    Jie, Gong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 95
  • [23] Short-term surgical outcomes of minimally invasive repeat hepatectomy for recurrent liver cancer
    Takehiro Noda
    Hidetoshi Eguchi
    Hiroshi Wada
    Yoshifumi Iwagami
    Daisaku Yamada
    Tadafumi Asaoka
    Kunihito Gotoh
    Koichi Kawamoto
    Yutaka Takeda
    Masahiro Tanemura
    Koji Umeshita
    Yuichiro Doki
    Masaki Mori
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2018, 32 : 46 - 52
  • [24] The Current State of Minimally Invasive Living Donor Hepatectomy
    Carpenter, Dustin
    Chaudhry, Sulemon
    Samstein, Benjamin
    CURRENT TRANSPLANTATION REPORTS, 2020, 7 (03) : 169 - 179
  • [25] Outcomes of robotic vs laparoscopic hepatectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Montalti, Roberto
    Berardi, Giammauro
    Patriti, Alberto
    Vivarelli, Marco
    Troisi, Roberto Ivan
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2015, 21 (27) : 8441 - 8451
  • [26] Predictors and outcomes of converted minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy: a propensity score matched analysis
    Hester, Caitlin A.
    Nassour, Ibrahim
    Christie, Alana
    Augustine, Mathew M.
    Mansour, John C.
    Polanco, Patricio M.
    Porembka, Matthew R.
    Shoultz, Thomas H.
    Wang, Sam C.
    Yopp, Adam C.
    Zeh, Herbert J., III
    Minter, Rebecca M.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2020, 34 (02): : 544 - 550
  • [27] Comparative Effectiveness of Minimally Invasive Surgery and Conventional Approaches for Major or Challenging Hepatectomy
    Thornblade, Lucas W.
    Shi, Xu
    Ruiz, Alex
    Flum, David R.
    Park, James O.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2017, 224 (05) : 851 - 861
  • [28] Minimally Invasive vs. Open Hepatectomy: a Comparative Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database
    Bagante, Fabio
    Spolverato, Gaya
    Strasberg, Steven M.
    Gani, Faiz
    Thompson, Vanessa
    Hall, Bruce L.
    Bentrem, David J.
    Pitt, Henry A.
    Pawlik, Timothy M.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2016, 20 (09) : 1608 - 1617
  • [29] Learning curves in minimally invasive hepatectomy: systematic review and meta-regression analysis
    Chua, Darren
    Syn, Nicholas
    Koh, Ye-Xin
    Goh, Brian K. P.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 108 (04) : 351 - 358
  • [30] Minimal-invasive versus open hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: Comparison of postoperative outcomes and long-term survivals using propensity score matching analysis
    Andreou, Andreas
    Struecker, Benjamin
    Raschzok, Nathanael
    Krenzien, Felix
    Haber, Philipp
    Wabitsch, Simon
    Waldbaur, Christoph
    Touet, Eva-Maria
    Eichelberg, Anne-Christine
    Atanasov, Georgi
    Biebl, Matthias
    Bahra, Marcus
    Oellinger, Robert
    Schmelzle, Moritz
    Pratschke, Johann
    SURGICAL ONCOLOGY-OXFORD, 2018, 27 (04): : 751 - 758