Remote monitoring of cardiovascular devices: a time and activity analysis

被引:74
作者
Cronin, Edmond M. [1 ]
Ching, Elizabeth A. [1 ]
Varma, Niraj [1 ]
Martin, David O. [1 ]
Wilkoff, Bruce L. [1 ]
Lindsay, Bruce D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin, Sect Electrophysiol & Pacing, Dept Cardiovasc Med, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
关键词
Remote monitoring; Pacemaker; Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD); Workflow; CARDIOVERTER-DEFIBRILLATOR PATIENTS; FOLLOW-UP; CRT-ICD;
D O I
10.1016/j.hrthm.2012.08.002
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Expanding indications for cardiovascular implantable electronic devices are accompanied by an increasing burden of device clinic follow-up. Remote monitoring (RM) may be less time-consuming compared to in-office follow-up; however, its effect on the device clinic workflow has not been clarified. OBJECTIVE To determine the impact of RM on device clinic workflow. METHODS Detailed workflow data were prospectively collected over a 2-week period in a busy device clinic. RESULTS Five hundred remote transmissions were received from 434 patients between March 1 and March 16, 2011-346 implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, 84 pacemaker, and 70 implantable loop recorder transmissions-on 4 RM platforms (CareLink 56.4%, Merlin. net 21.4%, LATITUDE 17.8%, and Home Monitoring 4.4%). The mean time spent per transmission was 11.5 +/- 7.7 minutes, which was less than in-person interrogations (27.7 +/- 9.9 minutes; P < .01). Of 500 transmissions, 135 (27.0%) demonstrated clinically important findings; however, only 41 (8.2%) were forwarded for physician review. Of 500 transmissions, 138 (27.6%) were unscheduled, and these were more likely to contain a clinically important event (56 of 138 [40.6%] vs 79 of 362 [21.8%]; P = .0001). A total of 5.8% of the transmissions were duplicate. Transmissions that revealed clinically important findings took longer to process than those that did not (21.0 +/- 7.4 minutes vs 10.1 +/- 2.1 minutes; P < .05). A total of 49.2% of the scheduled remote transmissions were missed because of patient noncompliance. Telephone follow-up of patients (mean 21 patients/d) who missed scheduled remote transmissions took a mean of 55.1 (range 20-98) min/d. CONCLUSIONS Analysis of RM transmissions has significant implications for the device clinic workflow. Nonactionable transmissions are rapidly processed, allowing clinicians to focus on clinically important findings. However, poor patient compliance complicates the workflow efficiency of currently available systems.
引用
收藏
页码:1947 / 1951
页数:5
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [11] Long-Term Outcome After ICD and CRT Implantation and Influence of Remote Device Follow-Up The ALTITUDE Survival Study
    Saxon, Leslie A.
    Hayes, David L.
    Gilliam, F. Roosevelt
    Heidenreich, Paul A.
    Day, John
    Seth, Milan
    Meyer, Timothy E.
    Jones, Paul W.
    Boehmer, John P.
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2010, 122 (23) : 2359 - 2367
  • [12] Varma N, 2012, EUR HEART J, V33, P992
  • [13] Varma N, 2012, HEART RHYTHM, V9, pS16
  • [14] Efficacy and Safety of Automatic Remote Monitoring for Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Follow-Up The Lumos-T Safely Reduces Routine Office Device Follow-Up (TRUST) Trial
    Varma, Niraj
    Epstein, Andrew E.
    Irimpen, Anand
    Schweikert, Robert
    Love, Charles
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2010, 122 (04) : 325 - U28
  • [15] HRS/EHRA expert consensus on the Monitoring of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices (CIEDs): Description of techniques, indications, personnel, frequency and ethical considerations
    Wilkoff, Bruce L.
    Auricchio, Angelo
    Brugada, Josep
    Cowie, Martin
    Ellenbogen, Kenneth A.
    Gillis, Anne M.
    Hayes, David L.
    Howlett, Jonathan G.
    Kautzner, Josef
    Love, Charles J.
    Morgan, John M.
    Priori, Silvia G.
    Reynolds, Dwight W.
    Schoenfeld, Mark H.
    Vardas, Panos E.
    [J]. HEART RHYTHM, 2008, 5 (06) : 907 - 925