Primary surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery in advanced ovarian cancer

被引:105
作者
Vergote, Ignace [1 ]
Amant, Frederic [1 ]
Kristensen, Gunnar [2 ,3 ]
Ehlen, Tom [4 ]
Reed, Nick S. [5 ,6 ]
Casado, Antonio [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Leuven, Louvain, Belgium
[2] Norwegian Radium Hosp, Oslo, Norway
[3] Inst Med Informat, Oslo, Norway
[4] Univ British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
[5] Gartnavel Royal Hosp, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[6] Beatson W Scotland Canc Ctr, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[7] Hosp Univ San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
关键词
IIIC EPITHELIAL OVARIAN; STAGE-III; CYTOREDUCTIVE SURGERY; SURGICAL CYTOREDUCTION; OPEN LAPAROSCOPY; PACLITAXEL; CARCINOMA; CISPLATIN; SURVIVAL; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/S0959-8049(11)70152-6
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Advanced ovarian cancer has a poor prognosis. Debulking surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy are the cornerstones of the treatment. Primary debulking surgery has been the standard of care in advanced ovarian cancer. Recently a new strategy with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery has been developed. In a recently published randomised trial of the EORTC-NCIC (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - National Cancer Institute Canada) in patients with extensive stage IIIc and IV ovarian cancer it was shown that the survival was similar for patients randomised to neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking compared to primary debulking surgery, followed by chemotherapy. The post-operative complications and mortality rates were lower after interval debulking than after primary debulking surgery. The most important independent prognostic factor for overall survival was no residual tumour after primary or interval debulking surgery. In some patients obtaining the goal of no residual tumour at interval debulking is difficult due to chemotherapy-induced fibrosis. On the other hand the patients randomised had very extensive stage IIIc and IV disease and in patients with metastases smaller than 5 cm the survival tended to be better after primary debulking surgery. Hence, selection of the correct patients with stage IIIc or IV ovarian cancer for primary debulking or neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery is important. Besides imaging with CT, diffusion MRI and/or PET-CT, also laparoscopy can play an important role in the selection of patients. It should be emphasised that the group of patients included in this study had extensive stage IIIc or IV disease. Surgical skills, especially in the upper abdomen, remain pivotal in the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer. However, very aggressive surgery should be tailored according to the general condition and extent of the disease of the patients. Otherwise, this type of aggressive surgery will result in unnecessary postoperative morbidity and mortality without improving survival. Hence, neoadjuvant chemotherapy should not be an easy way out, but is in some patients with stage IIIc or IV ovarian cancer a better alternative treatment option than primary debulking. According to the current treatment algorithm at the University Hospitals Leuven about 50% of the patients with stage IIIc or IV ovarian cancer are selected for neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
引用
收藏
页码:S88 / S92
页数:5
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Surgical treatment of diaphragm disease correlates with improved survival in optimally debulked advanced stage ovarian cancer [J].
Aletti, GD ;
Dowdy, SC ;
Podratz, KC ;
Cliby, WA .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2006, 100 (02) :283-287
[2]   Diagnostic open laparoscopy in the management of advanced ovarian cancer [J].
Angioli, R ;
Palaia, I ;
Zullo, MA ;
Muzii, L ;
Manci, N ;
Calcagno, M ;
Panici, PB .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2006, 100 (03) :455-461
[3]   Intraperitoneal cisplatin and paclitaxel in ovarian cancer [J].
Armstrong, DK ;
Bundy, B ;
Wenzel, L ;
Huang, HQ ;
Baergen, R ;
Lele, S ;
Copeland, LJ ;
Walker, JL ;
Burger, RA .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2006, 354 (01) :34-43
[4]  
AURE JC, 1971, OBSTET GYNECOL, V37, P1
[5]   Advanced epithelial ovarian cancer:: 1998 consensus statements [J].
Berek, JS ;
Bertelsen, K ;
du Bois, A ;
Brady, MF ;
Carmichael, J ;
Eisenhauer, EA ;
Gore, M ;
Grenman, S ;
Hamilton, TC ;
Hansen, SW ;
Harper, PG ;
Horvath, G ;
Kaye, SB ;
Lück, HJ ;
Lund, B ;
McGuire, WP ;
Neijt, JP ;
Ozols, RF ;
Parmar, MKB ;
Piccart-Gebhart, MJ ;
van Rijswijk, R ;
Rosenberg, P ;
Rustin, GJS ;
Sessa, C ;
Thigpen, JT ;
Tropé, C ;
Tuxen, MK ;
Vergote, I ;
Vermorken, JB ;
Willemse, PHB .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 1999, 10 :87-92
[6]   Survival effect of maximal cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian carcinoma during the platinum era: A meta-analysis [J].
Bristow, RE ;
Tomacruz, RS ;
Armstrong, DK ;
Trimble, EL ;
Montz, FJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 20 (05) :1248-1259
[7]   Platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval surgical cytoreduction for advanced ovarian cancer: A meta-analysis [J].
Bristow, Robert E. ;
Chi, Dennis S. .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2006, 103 (03) :1070-1076
[8]   External validation of a laparoscopic-based score to evaluate resectability of advanced ovarian cancers:: Clues for a simplified score [J].
Brun, Jean-Luc ;
Rouzier, Roman ;
Uzan, Serge ;
Darai, Emile .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2008, 110 (03) :354-359
[9]   What is the optimal goal of primary cytoreductive surgery for bulky stage IIIC epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC)? [J].
Chi, D. S. ;
Eisenhauer, E. L. ;
Lang, J. ;
Huh, J. ;
Haddad, L. ;
Abu-Rustum, N. R. ;
Sonoda, Y. ;
Levine, D. A. ;
Hensley, M. ;
Barakat, R. R. .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2006, 103 (02) :559-564
[10]   The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the management of patients with advanced stage ovarian cancer: Survey results from members of the Society of Gynecologic Oncologists [J].
Dewdney, Summer B. ;
Rimel, B. J. ;
Reinhart, Andrew J. ;
Kizer, Nora T. ;
Brooks, Rebecca A. ;
Massad, L. Stewart ;
Zighelboim, Israel .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2010, 119 (01) :18-21