Primary surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery in advanced ovarian cancer

被引:104
|
作者
Vergote, Ignace [1 ]
Amant, Frederic [1 ]
Kristensen, Gunnar [2 ,3 ]
Ehlen, Tom [4 ]
Reed, Nick S. [5 ,6 ]
Casado, Antonio [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Leuven, Louvain, Belgium
[2] Norwegian Radium Hosp, Oslo, Norway
[3] Inst Med Informat, Oslo, Norway
[4] Univ British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
[5] Gartnavel Royal Hosp, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[6] Beatson W Scotland Canc Ctr, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[7] Hosp Univ San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
关键词
IIIC EPITHELIAL OVARIAN; STAGE-III; CYTOREDUCTIVE SURGERY; SURGICAL CYTOREDUCTION; OPEN LAPAROSCOPY; PACLITAXEL; CARCINOMA; CISPLATIN; SURVIVAL; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/S0959-8049(11)70152-6
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Advanced ovarian cancer has a poor prognosis. Debulking surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy are the cornerstones of the treatment. Primary debulking surgery has been the standard of care in advanced ovarian cancer. Recently a new strategy with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery has been developed. In a recently published randomised trial of the EORTC-NCIC (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - National Cancer Institute Canada) in patients with extensive stage IIIc and IV ovarian cancer it was shown that the survival was similar for patients randomised to neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking compared to primary debulking surgery, followed by chemotherapy. The post-operative complications and mortality rates were lower after interval debulking than after primary debulking surgery. The most important independent prognostic factor for overall survival was no residual tumour after primary or interval debulking surgery. In some patients obtaining the goal of no residual tumour at interval debulking is difficult due to chemotherapy-induced fibrosis. On the other hand the patients randomised had very extensive stage IIIc and IV disease and in patients with metastases smaller than 5 cm the survival tended to be better after primary debulking surgery. Hence, selection of the correct patients with stage IIIc or IV ovarian cancer for primary debulking or neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery is important. Besides imaging with CT, diffusion MRI and/or PET-CT, also laparoscopy can play an important role in the selection of patients. It should be emphasised that the group of patients included in this study had extensive stage IIIc or IV disease. Surgical skills, especially in the upper abdomen, remain pivotal in the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer. However, very aggressive surgery should be tailored according to the general condition and extent of the disease of the patients. Otherwise, this type of aggressive surgery will result in unnecessary postoperative morbidity and mortality without improving survival. Hence, neoadjuvant chemotherapy should not be an easy way out, but is in some patients with stage IIIc or IV ovarian cancer a better alternative treatment option than primary debulking. According to the current treatment algorithm at the University Hospitals Leuven about 50% of the patients with stage IIIc or IV ovarian cancer are selected for neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
引用
收藏
页码:S88 / S92
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Primary debulking surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery for patients with advanced ovarian cancer
    Zheng, Hong
    Gao, Yu-Nong
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH, 2012, 24 (04) : 304 - 309
  • [2] Primary debulking surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery for patients with advanced ovarian cancer
    Hong Zheng
    Yu-Nong Gao
    ChineseJournalofCancerResearch, 2012, 24 (04) : 304 - 309
  • [3] PRIMARY DEBULKING SURGERY OR NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY FOLLOWED BY INTERVAL DEBULKING SURGERY FOR PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED EPITHELIAL OVARIAN CANCER?
    Mansouri, H.
    Zemni, I.
    Ben Safta, I.
    Achouri, L.
    Ben Hassouna, J.
    Hechiche, M.
    Chargui, R.
    Rahal, K.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2019, 29 : A120 - A120
  • [4] Primary debulking surgery vs. neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery for patients with advanced ovarian cancer
    Ce Bian
    Kui Yao
    Li Li
    Tao Yi
    Xia Zhao
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2016, 293 : 163 - 168
  • [5] Primary debulking surgery vs. neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery for patients with advanced ovarian cancer
    Bian, Ce
    Yao, Kui
    Li, Li
    Yi, Tao
    Zhao, Xia
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2016, 293 (01) : 163 - 168
  • [6] PRIMARY DEBULKING SURGERY (PDS) VERSUS NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY FOLLOWED BY INTERVAL DEBULKING SURGERY (IDS) FOR PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED OVARIAN CANCER
    Obeidat, R.
    Saidi, S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2013, 23 (08)
  • [7] Should neoadjuvant chemotherapy be preferred to an alternative treatment for advanced ovarian cancer: Comparison of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery and primary debulking surgery in patients with advanced ovarian cancer
    Liu, J.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2015, 137 : 176 - 176
  • [8] Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery versus primary debulking surgery in the advanced epithelial ovarian cancer - a retrospective cohort study
    Maricic, Slobodan
    Mandic, Aljosa
    Dejanovic, Ninoslav
    Kladar, Nebojsa
    Popovic, Marina
    Ivkovic-Kapicl, Tatjana
    Gutic, Bojana
    Kokanov, Dunja
    VOJNOSANITETSKI PREGLED, 2021, 78 (11) : 1193 - 1199
  • [9] Clinical significance of primary debulking surgery and neoadjuvant chemotherapy-interval debulking surgery in advanced ovarian cancer
    Nishio, Shin
    Ushijima, Kimio
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 50 (04) : 379 - 386
  • [10] Neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus primary debulking surgery in advanced ovarian cancer
    Vergote, IB
    De Wever, I
    Decloedt, J
    Tjalma, W
    Van Gramberen, M
    van Dam, P
    SEMINARS IN ONCOLOGY, 2000, 27 (03) : 31 - 36