Screening for Prostate Cancer With Prostate-Specific Antigen Testing: American Society of Clinical Oncology Provisional Clinical Opinion

被引:110
|
作者
Basch, Ethan [2 ]
Oliver, Thomas K. [1 ]
Vickers, Andrew [2 ]
Thompson, Ian [3 ]
Kantoff, Philip [4 ]
Parnes, Howard [5 ]
Loblaw, D. Andrew [6 ]
Roth, Bruce [7 ]
Williams, James [8 ]
Nam, Robert K. [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Amer Soc Clin Oncol, Alexandria, VA 22314 USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, New York, NY 10021 USA
[3] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78229 USA
[4] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Dana Farber Canc Inst, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[5] NCI, Rockville, MD USA
[6] Univ Toronto, Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Odette Canc Ctr, Toronto, ON, Canada
[7] Washington Univ, St Louis, MO USA
[8] Penn Prostate Canc Coalit, Camp Hill, PA USA
关键词
RANDOMIZED PROSTATE; FOLLOW-UP; MORTALITY; TRIAL; COMPLICATIONS; STATISTICS; MANAGEMENT; OUTCOMES; BIOPSY; RISK;
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2012.43.3441
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose An American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) provisional clinical opinion (PCO) offers timely clinical direction to the ASCO membership after publication or presentation of potentially practice-changing data from major studies. This PCO addresses the role of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing in the screening of men for prostate cancer. Clinical Context Prostate cancer is the second leading cause of cancer deaths among men in the United States. The rationale for screening men for prostate cancer is the potential to reduce the risk of death through early detection. Recent Data Evidence from a 2011 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality systematic review primarily informs this PCO on the benefits and harms of PSA-based screening. An update search was conducted to March 16, 2012, for additional evidence related to the topic. Results In one randomized trial, PSA testing in men who would not otherwise have been screened resulted in reduced death rates from prostate cancer, but it is uncertain whether the size of the effect was worth the harms associated with screening and subsequent unnecessary treatment. Although there are limitations to the existing data, there is evidence to suggest that men with longer life expectancy may benefit from PSA testing. Adverse events associated with prostate biopsy are low for the majority of men; however, several population-based studies have shown increasing rates of infectious complications after prostate biopsy, which is a concern.
引用
收藏
页码:3020 / 3025
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A System Dynamics Model of Serum Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening for Prostate Cancer
    Palma, Anton
    Lounsbury, David W.
    Schlecht, Nicolas F.
    Agalliu, Ilir
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2016, 183 (03) : 227 - 236
  • [32] Association of prostate-specific antigen doubling time and cancer in men undergoing repeat prostate biopsy
    Moreira, Daniel M.
    Gerber, Leah
    Thomas, Jean-Alfred
    Banez, Lionel L.
    McKeever, Madeline G.
    Freedland, Stephen J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 19 (08) : 741 - 747
  • [33] Updated Japanese Urological Association Guidelines on prostate-specific antigen-based screening for prostate cancer in 2010
    Naito, Seiji
    Kakehi, Yoshiyuki
    Okuyama, Akihiko
    Imamura, Tomoaki
    Yasunaga, Hideo
    Akaza, Hideyuki
    Hinotsu, Shiro
    Arai, Yoichi
    Dokiya, Takushi
    Egawa, Shin
    Suzuki, Kazuhiro
    Koga, Hirofumi
    Masumori, Naoya
    Akakura, Koichiro
    Kawashima, Kiyotaka
    Okihara, Koji
    Ito, Kazuto
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 17 (10) : 830 - 838
  • [34] The relationship between diabetes, prostate-specific antigen screening tests, and prostate cancer
    Miller, Eric A.
    Pinsky, Paul F.
    Pierre-Victor, Dudith
    CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL, 2018, 29 (10) : 907 - 914
  • [35] The Impact of Interscreening Interval and Age on Prostate Cancer Screening With Prostate-Specific Antigen
    Wu, Grace Hui-Min
    Auvinen, Anssi
    Yen, Amy Ming-Fang
    Hakama, Matti
    Tammela, Teuvo L.
    Stenman, Ulf-Hakan
    Kujala, Paula
    Ruutu, Mirja
    Chen, Hsiu-Hsi
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2012, 61 (05) : 1011 - 1018
  • [36] Prostate Cancer Screening and Determining the Appropriate Prostate-Specific Antigen Cutoff Values
    Catalona, William J.
    Loeb, Stacy
    JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK, 2010, 8 (02): : 265 - 270
  • [37] Hepatitis B Virus Screening for Patients With Cancer Before Therapy: American Society of Clinical Oncology Provisional Clinical Opinion Update
    Hwang, Jessica P.
    Somerfield, Mark R.
    Alston-Johnson, Devena E.
    Cryer, Donna R.
    Feld, Jordan J.
    Kramer, Barnett S.
    Sabichi, Anita L.
    Wong, Sandra L.
    Artz, Andrew S.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 33 (19) : 2212 - U128
  • [38] Metastatic Prostate Cancer Incidence and Prostate-specific Antigen Testing: New Insights from the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer
    Buzzoni, Carlotta
    Auvinen, Anssi
    Roobol, Monique J.
    Carlsson, Sigrid
    Moss, Sue M.
    Puliti, Donella
    de Koning, Harry J.
    Bangma, Chris H.
    Denis, Louis J.
    Kwiatkowski, Maciej
    Lujan, Marcos
    Nelen, Vera
    Paez, Alvaro
    Randazzo, Marco
    Rebillard, Xavier
    Tammela, Teuvo L. J.
    Villers, Arnauld
    Hugosson, Jonas
    Schroder, Fritz H.
    Zappa, Marco
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2015, 68 (05) : 885 - 890
  • [39] Screening asymptomatic men for prostate cancer: A comparison of international guidelines on prostate-specific antigen testing
    Jackson, Sherena D.
    de la Rue, May R.
    Greenslade, Thomas P. L.
    John, Anna M.
    Wahid, Shahida
    Martin, Richard M.
    Williams, Naomi J.
    Turner, Emma L.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2022, 29 (04) : 268 - 271
  • [40] Clinical Significance of Measuring Prostate-Specific Antigen
    Arneth, Borros M.
    LABMEDICINE, 2009, 40 (08): : 487 - 491