Improving the efficiency and relevance of evidence-based recommendations in the era of whole-genome sequencing: an EGAPP methods update

被引:41
作者
Veenstra, David L. [1 ]
Piper, Margaret [2 ]
Haddow, James E. [3 ]
Pauker, Stephen G. [4 ]
Klein, Roger [5 ]
Richards, Carolyn Sue [6 ]
Tunis, Sean R. [7 ]
Djulbegovic, Benjamin [8 ,9 ,10 ,11 ]
Marrone, Michael [12 ,13 ]
Lin, Jennifer S. [14 ]
Berg, Alfred O. [15 ]
Calonge, Ned [16 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Inst Publ Hlth Genet, Dept Pharm, Pharmaceut Outcomes Res & Policy Program, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Blue Cross & Blue Shield Assoc, Technol Evaluat Ctr, Chicago, IL USA
[3] Brown Univ, Warren Alpert Med Sch, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Providence, RI 02912 USA
[4] Tufts Med Ctr, Dept Med, Div Clin Decis Making Informat & Telemed, Boston, MA USA
[5] Univ S Florida, H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr & Res Inst, Coll Med, Blood Ctr Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI USA
[6] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Mol & Med Genet, Portland, OR 97201 USA
[7] Ctr Med Technol Policy, Baltimore, MD USA
[8] Univ S Florida, Coll Med, Ctr Evidence Based Med & Hlth Outcomes, Tampa, FL 33612 USA
[9] Univ S Florida, Coll Med, H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr & Res Inst, Dept Med, Tampa, FL 33612 USA
[10] Univ S Florida, Coll Med, H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr & Res Inst, Dept Hlth Outcomes & Behav, Tampa, FL 33612 USA
[11] Univ S Florida, Coll Med, H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr & Res Inst, Dept Hematol, Tampa, FL 33612 USA
[12] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Off Publ Hlth Genom, Atlanta, GA USA
[13] McKing Consulting, Atlanta, GA USA
[14] Kaiser Permanente NW, Ctr Hlth Res, Portland, OR USA
[15] Univ Washington, Dept Family Med, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[16] Colorado Trust, Denver, CO USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
evidence-based medicine/methods; evidence-based medicine/standards; genetics; genomics/methods; genomics/standards; medical/methods; SERVICES TASK-FORCE; PUBLIC-HEALTH; QUALITY; PRINCIPLES; DISEASE; GRADE;
D O I
10.1038/gim.2012.106
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
To provide an update on recent revisions to Evaluation of Genomic Applications in Practice and Prevention (EGAPP) methods designed to improve efficiency, and an assessment of the implications of whole genome sequencing for evidence-based recommendation development. Improvements to the EGAPP approach include automated searches for horizon scanning, a quantitative ranking process for topic prioritization, and the development of a staged evidence review and evaluation process. The staged process entails (i) triaging tests with minimal evidence of clinical validity, (ii) using and updating existing reviews, (iii) evaluating clinical validity prior to analytic validity or clinical utility, (iv) using decision modeling to assess potential clinical utility when direct evidence is not available. EGAPP experience to date suggests the following approaches will be critical for the development of evidence based recommendations in the whole genome sequencing era: (i) use of triage approaches and frameworks to improve efficiency, (ii) development of evidence thresholds that consider the value of further research, (iii) incorporation of patient preferences, and (iv) engagement of diverse stakeholders. The rapid advances in genomics present a significant challenge to traditional evidence based medicine, but also an opportunity for innovative approaches to recommendation development. Genet Med 2013:15(1):14-24
引用
收藏
页码:14 / 24
页数:11
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2010, METH GUID MED TEST R
[2]  
[Anonymous], INCL CRIT
[3]  
[Anonymous], KRAS TEST ANTIEGFR T
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2000, METAANALYSIS DECISIO
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2011, FIND WHAT WORKS HLTH
[6]  
[Anonymous], TECHNOL EVAL CENT AS
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2011, METHODS FUTURE RES N
[8]  
[Anonymous], EV GEN APPL PRACT PR
[9]  
[Anonymous], WHAT IS SYSTEMATIC R
[10]  
[Anonymous], AHRQ EFFECTIVE HLTH