Lateral lumbar interbody fusion for sagittal balance correction and spinal deformity

被引:69
作者
Phan, Kevin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Rao, Prashanth J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Scherman, Daniel B. [3 ]
Dandie, Gordon [3 ]
Mobbs, Ralph J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Prince Wales Private Hosp, NeuroSpine Clin, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia
[2] Univ New S Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Westmead Hosp, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia
关键词
Direct lateral interbody fusion; Lateral lumbar interbody fusion; Minimally invasive; Spinal deformity; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; TRANSPSOAS APPROACH; OUTCOMES; COMPLICATIONS; PARAMETERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jocn.2015.03.050
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
We conducted a systematic review to assess the safety and clinical and radiological outcomes of the recently introduced, direct or extreme lateral lumbar interbody fusion (XLIF) approach for degenerative spinal deformity disorders. Open fusion and instrumentation has traditionally been the mainstay treatment. However, in recent years, there has been an increasing emphasis on minimally invasive fusion and instrumentation techniques, with the aim of minimizing surgical trauma and blood loss and reducing hospitalization. From six electronic databases, 21 eligible studies were included for review. The pooled weighted average mean of preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores was 6.8, compared to a postoperative VAS score of 2.9 (p < 0.0001). The weighted average preoperative and postoperative coronal segmental Cobb angles were 3.6 and 1.1 degrees, respectively. The weighted average preoperative and postoperative coronal regional Cobb angles were 19.1 and 10.0 degrees, respectively. Regional lumbar lordosis also significantly improved from 35.8 to 43.3 degrees. Sagittal alignment was comparable pre- and postoperatively (34 mm versus 35.1 mm). The weighted average operative duration was 125.6 minutes, whilst the mean estimated blood loss was 155 mL. The weighted average hospitalization length was 3.6 days. Whilst the available data is limited, minimally invasive XLIF procedures appear to be a promising alternative for the treatment of scoliosis, with improved functional VAS and Oswestry disability index outcomes and restored coronal deformity. Future comparative studies are warranted to assess the long term benefits and risks of XLIF compared to anterior and posterior procedures. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1714 / 1721
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Effect of Sagittal Balance on Risk of Falling after Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery Combined with Posterior Surgery
    Lee, Byung Ho
    Yang, Jae-Ho
    Kim, Hak-Sun
    Suk, Kyung-Soo
    Lee, Hwan-Mo
    Park, Jin-Oh
    Moon, Seong-Hwan
    YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 58 (06) : 1177 - 1185
  • [42] Changes in Sagittal Alignment Following Short-Level Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Comparison between Posterior and Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusions
    Nakashima, Hiroaki
    Kanemura, Tokumi
    Satake, Kotaro
    Ishikawa, Yoshimoto
    Ouchida, Jun
    Segi, Naoki
    Yamaguchi, Hidetoshi
    Imagama, Shiro
    ASIAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2019, 13 (06) : 904 - 912
  • [43] Treatment of Adult Spinal Deformity with Sagittal Imbalance Using Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Can We Predict How Much Lordosis Correction Is Possible?
    Kim, Whoan Jeang
    Lee, Jae Won
    Park, Kun Young
    Chang, Shann Haw
    Song, Dae Geon
    Choy, Won Sik
    ASIAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2019, 13 (06) : 1017 - 1027
  • [44] Minimally Invasive Deformity Correction Technique: Initial Case Series of Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion at L5-S1 for Multilevel Lumbar Interbody Fusion in a Lateral Decubitus Position
    Singh, Shikha
    McCloskey, Kyle
    Ahmad, Hasan S.
    Turlip, Ryan
    Ghenbot, Yohannes
    Sinha, Saurabh
    Yoon, Jang W.
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 162 : E416 - E426
  • [45] Intraoperative Neuromonitoring During Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Alluri, Ram
    Mok, Jung Kee
    Vaishnav, Avani
    Shelby, Tara
    Sivaganesan, Ahilan
    Hah, Raymond
    Qureshi, Sheeraz A.
    NEUROSPINE, 2021, 18 (03) : 430 - 436
  • [46] Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Indications, Outcomes, and Complications
    Kwon, Brian
    Kim, David Hanwuk
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2016, 24 (02) : 96 - 105
  • [47] Effect of Unintended Tissue Injury on the Development of Thigh Symptoms After Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients With Adult Spinal Deformity
    Yamato, Yu
    Hasegawa, Tomohiko
    Yoshida, Go
    Banno, Tomohiro
    Oe, Shin
    Arima, Hideyuki
    Ide, Koichiro
    Yamada, Tomohiro
    Kurosu, Kenta
    Nakai, Keiichi
    Matsuyama, Yukihiro
    SPINE, 2024, 49 (03) : 181 - 187
  • [48] Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Taba, Houtan A.
    Williams, Seth K.
    NEUROSURGERY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2020, 31 (01) : 33 - +
  • [49] Neurologic deficit following lateral lumbar interbody fusion
    Pumberger, Matthias
    Hughes, Alexander P.
    Huang, Russel R.
    Sama, Andrew A.
    Cammisa, Frank P.
    Girardi, Federico P.
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2012, 21 (06) : 1192 - 1199
  • [50] Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion vs. Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Gao, Quan-You
    Wei, Fei-Long
    Li, Tian
    Zhu, Kai-Long
    Du, Ming-Rui
    Heng, Wei
    Yang, Fan
    Gao, Hao-Ran
    Qian, Ji-Xian
    Zhou, Cheng-Pei
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2022, 9