Ambulatory Blood Pressure Response to Once-Daily Fimasartan: An 8-Week, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Comparator, Parallel-Group Study in Korean Patients With Mild To Moderate Essential Hypertension

被引:22
|
作者
Lee, Howard [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Kee Sik [3 ]
Chae, Shung Chull [4 ]
Jeong, Myung Ho [5 ]
Kim, Dong-Soo [6 ]
Oh, Byung-Hee [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Sch Pharm, Dept Bioengn & Therapeut Sci, Ctr Drug Dev Sci, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] Univ Calif Washington Ctr, Washington, DC USA
[3] Daegu Catholic Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Internal Med, Div Cardiol, Taegu, South Korea
[4] Kyungpook Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Div Cardiol, Taegu, South Korea
[5] Chonnam Natl Univ Hosp, Ctr Heart, Kwangju, South Korea
[6] Inje Univ, Paik Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Div Cardiol, Pusan, South Korea
[7] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Internal Med, Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Seoul 151, South Korea
关键词
24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring; angiotensin receptor blocker essential hypertension; fimasartan; valsartan; PEAK RATIO; RECEPTOR BLOCKERS; SMOOTHNESS INDEX; EFFICACY; TROUGH; TOLERABILITY; ENALAPRIL; LOSARTAN; PHARMACOKINETICS; IRBESARTAN;
D O I
10.1016/j.clinthera.2013.06.021
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background: Fimasartan, a selective angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker, was approved in Korea for the treatment of patients with mild to moderate hypertension. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the 24-hour blood pressure (BP) profiles before and after 8-week treatment with fimasartan and to compare them with those of valsartan. Methods: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, parallel-group study was conducted using ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM). Korean patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension were enrolled and randomly received once-daily oral fimasartan 60 or 120 mg or valsartan 80 mg for 8 weeks. ABPM was performed before and after 8-week treatment, and clinic BP was also measured. Based on ABPM data, trough-to-peak ratio and smoothness index were derived. Tolerability was monitored throughout the study. Results: Ninety-two patients were enrolled (mean [SD] age, 54.1 [8.2] years; weight, 67.9 [10.2] kg). After 8 weeks, 24-hour, daytime, and nighttime mean ambulatory systolic and diastolic BPs (SBP and DBP, respectively) were significantly decreased in all 3 treatment groups (range: SBP, -9.2 to -15.6 mm Hg; DBP, -5.0 to -10.7 mm Hg; P<0.0001-<0.05). The global trough-to-peak ratios of ambulatory DBP in the fimasartan groups were 0.74 (60 mg/d) and 0.81 (120 mg/d)-45.1% and 58.8% higher, respectively, than the ratio of 0.51 in the valsartan group. Fimasartan 60 mg/d was associated with 53.5% (SBP) and 68.3% (DBP) greater smoothness index scores compared with those with valsartan 80 mg/d (SBP, 1.52 vs. 0.99; DBP, 1.38 vs. 0.82). The decrease in clinic-measured DBP was significantly greater in the fimasartan 60-mg/d group compared with that in the valsartan 80-mg/d group (-14.0 vs -8.7 mm Hg; P = 0.0380). Fimasartan was well tolerated; headache was the most common adverse event. Conclusion: Once-daily fimasartan effectively maintained a BP-reduction profile over the full 24-hour dosing interval; this profile was comparable to or slightly better than that of once-daily valsartan. Fimasartan was well tolerated; headache was the most common adverse event. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00922441. (C) 2013 Elsevier HS Journals, Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1337 / 1349
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Telmisartan plus hydrochlorothiazide versus telmisartan or hydrochlorothiazide monotherapy in patients with mild to moderate hypertension: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial
    McGill, JB
    Reilly, PA
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2001, 23 (06) : 833 - 850
  • [32] A 12-WEEK, DOUBLE-BLIND, RANDOMIZED, FORCED TITRATION, PARALLEL-GROUP STUDY TO ASSESS THE EFFECTS OF NAPROXCINOD AND NAPROXEN ON ARTERIAL BLOOD PRESSURE AS MEASURED BY ABPM IN OSTEOARTHRITIS PATIENTS WITH CONTROLLED ESSENTIAL HYPERTENSION
    Townsend, R. R.
    Bakris, G. L.
    Erdy, G.
    Hazan, L.
    Hall, C.
    Longlade, P.
    Fleming, R.
    Djian, J.
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2009, 27 : S7 - S7
  • [33] The Phase III, double-blind, parallel-group controlled study of amlodipine 10 mg once daily in Japanese patients with essential hypertension who insufficiently responded to amlodipine 5 mg once daily
    T Fujiwara
    Y Ii
    J Hatsuzawa
    H Murase
    T Watanabe
    M Murakami
    N Kimura
    J Buch
    T Tsuchihashi
    T Saruta
    Journal of Human Hypertension, 2009, 23 : 521 - 529
  • [34] A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial of the antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of a combination of once-daily Losartan 100mg/hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg compared with Losartan 100-mg monotherapy in the treatment of mild to severe essential hypertension
    Gleim, Gilbert W.
    Rubino, Joseph
    Zhang, Hongyan
    Shahinfar, Shahnaz
    Soffer, Beth A.
    Lyle, Paulette A.
    Littlejohn, Thomas W., III
    Feig, Peter U.
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2006, 28 (10) : 1639 - 1648
  • [35] A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 8-week trial of the efficacy and tolerability of once-daily Losartan 100 mg/hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg and Losartan 50 mg/hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg in the treatment of moderate-to-severe essential hypertension
    Gradman, AH
    Brady, WE
    Gazdick, LP
    Lyle, P
    Zeldin, RK
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2002, 24 (07) : 1049 - 1061
  • [36] A Randomized, Double-blind, Active-controlled, Two Parallel-Group, Optional Titration, Multicenter, Phase IIIb Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Fimasartan Versus Perindopril Monotherapy With and Without a Diuretic Combination in Elderly Patients With Essential Hypertension
    Lee, Hae-Young
    Kim, Kwang-Il
    Ihm, Sang Hyun
    Rhee, Moo-Yong
    Sohn, Il Suk
    Park, Sungha
    Jeon, Eun-Seok
    Song, Jong-Min
    Pyun, Wook Bum
    Sung, Ki-Chul
    Kim, Moo Hyun
    Kim, Sang-Hyun
    Kim, Seok-Yeon
    Kim, Shin-Jae
    Kim, Eung Ju
    Shin, Jinho
    Lee, Sung Yun
    Chun, Kook-Jin
    Jeong, Jin-Ok
    Chae, Shung Chull
    Yoo, Ki Dong
    Choi, Young Jin
    Park, Yong Hwan
    Kim, Cheol-Ho
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2021, 43 (10) : 1746 - 1756
  • [37] Losartan versus valsartan in the treatment of patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension: Data from a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, 12-week trial
    Elliott, WJ
    Calhoun, DA
    DeLucca, PT
    Gazdick, LP
    Kerns, DE
    Zeldin, RK
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2001, 23 (08) : 1166 - 1179
  • [38] A multicenter, parallel comparative study of the antihypertensive efficacy of once-daily lisinopril vs enalapril with 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in essential hypertension
    Coca, A
    Sobrino, J
    Modol, J
    Soler, J
    Minguez, A
    Plana, J
    DelaSierra, A
    JOURNAL OF HUMAN HYPERTENSION, 1996, 10 (12) : 837 - 841
  • [39] A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study of once-daily inhaled fluticasone furoate on the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenocortical axis of children with asthma
    Philippe Bareille
    Susan Tomkins
    Varsha Imber
    Mohammed Tayob
    Karen Dunn
    Rashmi Mehta
    Sanjeev Khindri
    Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology, 16
  • [40] Efficacy and Tolerability of Nebivolol Monotherapy by Baseline Systolic Blood Pressure: A Retrospective Analysis of Pooled Data From Two Multicenter, 12-Week, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Dose-Ranging Studies in Patients With Mild to Moderate Essential Hypertension
    Germino, F. Wilford
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2009, 31 (09) : 1946 - 1956