Influence of social networks in healthcare on preparation for selection procedures of health professions education: a Dutch interview study

被引:8
作者
Mulder, Lianne [1 ,2 ]
Wouters, Anouk [1 ,2 ]
Fikrat-Wevers, Suzanne [3 ]
Koster, Andries S. [4 ]
Ravesloot, Jan Hindrik [5 ]
Croiset, Gerda [6 ]
Kusurkar, Rashmi A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Locat Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Res Educ, Amsterdam UMC, De Boelelaan 1118, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Fac Psychol & Educ, LEARN Res Inst Learning & Educ, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Erasmus MC, Inst Med Educ Res Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[4] Univ Utrecht, Dept Pharmaceut Sci, Utrecht, Netherlands
[5] Locat Univ Amsterdam, Dept Med Biol, Amsterdam UMC, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[6] Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Wenckebach Inst Educ & Training, Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
medical education & training; education & training (see medical education & training); qualitative research; MEDICAL-SCHOOL ADMISSIONS; WIDENING ACCESS; PARTICIPATION; PERFORMANCE; APPLICANTS; DENTISTRY; STUDENTS;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062474
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives Health professions education (HPE) students are often not representative of the populations they will serve. The underrepresentation of non-traditional students is problematic because diversity is essential for promoting excellence in health education and care. This study aimed to understand the perceptions of traditional and non-traditional students regarding facilitators and barriers in preparing for HPE selection procedures, and to determine the role of social networks in their decision-making and preparations to apply. Methods A qualitative study was conducted with 26 Dutch youth who were interested in university-level HPE programmes. Semistructured interviews and sociograms were analysed using thematic analysis, adopting a constructivist approach. Results Twenty-six high school students participated, with traditional and non-traditional backgrounds, with and without social networks in healthcare and higher education. Two themes were constructed. First, four high-impact facilitators helped to overcome barriers to apply and in preparation for selection: access to a social network connection working or studying in healthcare, to correct information, to healthcare experience and to a social network connection in higher education. Lack of information was the main barrier while access to social network connections in healthcare was the main facilitator to overcome this barrier. However, this access was unevenly distributed. Second, access alone is not enough: the need for agency to make use of available facilitators is also essential. Conclusions The themes are discussed using intersectionality. Traditional students with access to facilitators develop their self-efficacy and agency within social structures that privilege them, whereas non-traditional students must develop those skills without such structures. Our findings provide recommendations for the ways in which universities can remove barriers that cause unequal opportunities to prepare for the selection of HPE programmes. Along with equitable admissions, these recommendations can help to achieve a more representative student population and subsequently a better quality of health education and care.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]  
Alexander K, 2018, PALGRAVE STUD EXCELL, P143, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-78316-1_7
[2]   'Why not you?' Discourses of widening access on UK medical school websites [J].
Alexander, Kirsty ;
Palma, Tania Fahey ;
Nicholson, Sandra ;
Cleland, Jennifer .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2017, 51 (06) :598-611
[3]   Students' social networks are diverse, dynamic and deliberate when transitioning to clinical training [J].
Atherley, Anique E. N. ;
Nimmon, Laura ;
Teunissen, Pim W. ;
Dolmans, Diana ;
Hegazi, Iman ;
Hu, Wendy .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2021, 55 (03) :376-386
[4]   "The biggest barrier was my own self": the role of social comparison in non-traditional students' journey to medicine [J].
Ball, Rachel ;
Alexander, Kirsty ;
Cleland, Jennifer .
PERSPECTIVES ON MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2020, 9 (03) :147-156
[5]   SELF-EFFICACY MECHANISM IN HUMAN AGENCY [J].
BANDURA, A .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1982, 37 (02) :122-147
[6]  
Bandura A, 2000, CONTROL OF HUMAN BEHAVIOR, MENTAL PROCESSES, AND CONSCIOUSNESS, P17
[7]  
Barker C., 2004, SAGE DICT CULTURAL S
[8]   How to ... be reflexive when conducting qualitative research [J].
Barrett, Aileen ;
Kajamaa, Anu ;
Johnston, Jenny .
CLINICAL TEACHER, 2020, 17 (01) :9-12
[9]   The experiences of medical students from First-in-Family (FiF) university backgrounds: a Bourdieusian perspective from one English medical school [J].
Bassett, Andrew M. ;
Brosnan, Caragh ;
Southgate, Erica ;
Lempp, Heidi .
RESEARCH IN POST-COMPULSORY EDUCATION, 2019, 24 (04) :331-355
[10]  
Bourdieu P., 1984, Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste