Are Attention Check Questions a Threat to Scale Validity?

被引:230
作者
Kung, Franki Y. H. [1 ]
Kwok, Navio [1 ]
Brown, Douglas J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
来源
APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW-PSYCHOLOGIE APPLIQUEE-REVUE INTERNATIONALE | 2018年 / 67卷 / 02期
关键词
MECHANICAL TURK; THINKING TOO; DELIBERATION; RECOMMENDATIONS; REFLECTION; RESPONSES; QUALITY; WORKERS; BIASES;
D O I
10.1111/apps.12108
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Attention checks have become increasingly popular in survey research as a means to filter out careless respondents. Despite their widespread use, little research has empirically tested the impact of attention checks on scale validity. In fact, because attention checks can induce a more deliberative mindset in survey respondents, they may change the way respondents answer survey questions, posing a threat to scale validity. In two studies, we tested this hypothesis (N=816). We examined whether common attention checksinstructed-response items (Study 1) and an instructional manipulation check (Study 2)impact responses to a well-validated management scale. Results showed no evidence that they affect scale validity, both in reported scale means and tests of measurement invariance. These findings allow researchers to justify the use of attention checks without compromising scale validity and encourage future research to examine other survey characteristic-respondent dynamics to advance our use of survey methods.
引用
收藏
页码:264 / 283
页数:20
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] Arbuckle J.L., 2010, IBM SPSS AMOS 19 USE
  • [2] Separating the Shirkers from the Workers? Making Sure Respondents Pay Attention on Self-Administered Surveys
    Berinsky, Adam J.
    Margolis, Michele F.
    Sances, Michael W.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2014, 58 (03) : 739 - 753
  • [3] Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research: Amazon.com's Mechanical Turk
    Berinsky, Adam J.
    Huber, Gregory A.
    Lenz, Gabriel S.
    [J]. POLITICAL ANALYSIS, 2012, 20 (03) : 351 - 368
  • [4] Berry DTR., 1992, Psychological Assessment, V4, P340, DOI [10.1037/1040-3590.4.3.340, DOI 10.1037/1040-3590.4.3.340]
  • [5] Who Cares and Who Is Careless? Insufficient Effort Responding as a Reflection of Respondent Personality
    Bowling, Nathan A.
    Huang, Jason L.
    Bragg, Caleb B.
    Khazon, Steve
    Liu, Mengqiao
    Blackmore, Caitlin E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 111 (02) : 218 - 229
  • [6] Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A New Source of Inexpensive, Yet High-Quality, Data?
    Buhrmester, Michael
    Kwang, Tracy
    Gosling, Samuel D.
    [J]. PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2011, 6 (01) : 3 - 5
  • [7] Calvillo DP, 2009, JUDGM DECIS MAK, V4, P509
  • [8] Nonnaivete among Amazon Mechanical Turk workers: Consequences and solutions for behavioral researchers
    Chandler, Jesse
    Mueller, Pam
    Paolacci, Gabriele
    [J]. BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2014, 46 (01) : 112 - 130
  • [9] The assessment of trust orientation
    Couch, LL
    Adams, JM
    Jones, WH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 1996, 67 (02) : 305 - 323
  • [10] CONSTRUCT VALIDITY IN PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS
    CRONBACH, LJ
    MEEHL, PE
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1955, 52 (04) : 281 - 302