Outcomes on diverting ostomy formation and reversal after low anterior resection in the older more advanced rectal cancer patient

被引:2
|
作者
Ketelaers, S. H. J. [1 ]
Orsini, R. G. [2 ]
Nieuwenhuijzen, G. A. P. [1 ]
Rutten, H. J. T. [1 ,3 ]
Burger, J. W. A. [1 ]
Bloemen, J. G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Catharina Hosp, Dept Surg, POB 1350, NL-5602 ZA Eindhoven, Netherlands
[2] ETZ Elisabeth TweeSteden Hosp, Dept Surg, Tilburg, Netherlands
[3] Maastricht Univ, Dept GROW, Sch Dev Biol & Oncol, Maastricht, Netherlands
来源
EJSO | 2022年 / 48卷 / 06期
关键词
Rectal cancer; Ostomy; Colostomy; Ileostomy; Surgery; Elderly; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; ANASTOMOTIC LEAKAGE; LOOP ILEOSTOMY; STOMA REVERSAL; DEFUNCTIONING STOMAS; RISK-FACTORS; COMPLICATIONS; MORTALITY; READMISSION; DEHYDRATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejso.2021.12.020
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: To decrease morbidity caused by anastomotic leakages after a low anterior resection (LAR) with primary anastomosis, a diverting ostomy is often created. Reversal of a diverting ostomy is associated with morbidity, which may result in non-reversal, particularly in the elderly. This study aimed to describe the diverting ostomy-related outcomes in elderly patients with more advanced rectal cancer after LAR. Materials and methods: All rectosigmoid and rectal cancer patients >= 70 years who underwent LAR with primary anastomosis between 2006 and 2019 in the Catharina Hospital (Eindhoven, The Netherlands) were included for analyses. Reversal rates, ostomy-related complications, morbidity and mortality after ostomy reversal, and definitive ostomy rates were evaluated. Results: In total 164 patients were included, of which 150 (91.5%) underwent primary or secondary ostomy creation. Ostomy-related complications were reported in 34.7% (95%-CI 27.1-42.9%). In total, 72.5% (95%-CI 64.2-79.7%) reversed their diverting ostomy. Non-reversal was mostly due to relapsing disease (52.6%). Median time to ostomy reversal was 3.2 months (IQR 2.3-5.0). No or minor complications after ostomy reversal were observed in 84.0% (95%-CI 75.3-90.6%). Over time, ostomy recreation was performed in 15.0% (95%-CI 8.6-23.5%), and ultimately 65.8% (95%-CI 57.8-73.2%) were ostomy-free after the median follow-up of 3.8 years. Conclusion: Although most elderly successfully reversed their diverting ostomy after LAR with limited morbidity, attention should be paid for the risk of non-reversal and ostomy recreation over time. Preoperative patient counselling is important in every individual to be able to decide if LAR with primary anastomosis or a permanent end colostomy is preferred. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd, BASO similar to The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1414 / 1420
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: comparison of stapled versus compression anastomosis
    Dauser, Bernhard
    Braunschmid, Tamara
    Ghaffari, Shahbaz
    Riss, Stefan
    Stift, Anton
    Herbst, Friedrich
    LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2013, 398 (07) : 957 - 964
  • [42] Influence of pelvic volume on surgical outcome after low anterior resection for rectal cancer
    zur Hausen, G.
    Groene, J.
    Kaufmann, D.
    Niehues, S. M.
    Aschenbrenner, K.
    Stroux, A.
    Hamm, B.
    Kreis, M. E.
    Lauscher, Johannes C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2017, 32 (08) : 1125 - 1135
  • [43] Low anterior resection syndrome and quality of life after intersphincteric resection for rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched study
    Shen, Y.
    Yang, T.
    Zeng, H.
    Meng, W.
    Deng, X.
    Wei, M.
    Wang, Z.
    TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2023, 27 (12) : 1307 - 1317
  • [44] The application of defunctioning stomas after low anterior resection of rectal cancer
    Hongwei Yao
    Yongbo An
    Zhongtao Zhang
    Surgery Today, 2019, 49 : 451 - 459
  • [45] Incidence and risk factors for rectovaginal fistula after low anterior resection for rectal cancer
    Watanabe, Jun
    Ota, Mitsuyoshi
    Kawaguchi, Daisuke
    Shima, Hidetaka
    Kaida, Shuhei
    Osada, Shunichi
    Kamimukai, Nobuyuki
    Kamiya, Noriyuki
    Ishibe, Atsushi
    Watanabe, Kazuteru
    Matsuyama, Ryusei
    Akiyama, Hirotoshi
    Ichikawa, Yasushi
    Oba, Mari
    Endo, Itaru
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2015, 30 (12) : 1659 - 1666
  • [46] Assessment of the risk of permanent stoma after low anterior resection in rectal cancer patients
    Marcin Zeman
    Marek Czarnecki
    Andrzej Chmielarz
    Adam Idasiak
    Maciej Grajek
    Agnieszka Czarniecka
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 18
  • [47] Comparison of outcomes of abdominoperineal resection vs low anterior resection in very-low rectal cancer
    Muldoon, Roberta L.
    Bethurum, Alva J.
    Gamboa, Adriana C.
    Zhang, Kevin
    Ye, Fei
    Regenbogen, Scott E.
    Abdel-Misih, Sherif
    Ejaz, Aslam
    Wise, Paul E.
    Silviera, Matthew
    Holder-Murray, Jennifer
    Balch, Glen C.
    Hawkins, Alexander T.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2024, 28 (09) : 1450 - 1455
  • [48] Analyzing quality of life after low anterior resection for rectal cancer
    Yazd, Seyed Mostafa Meshkati
    Shahriarirad, Reza
    Almasi, Shayan
    Naddaffard, Darioush
    Sheikhi, Saman
    Mosayebi, Imana
    Goudarzi, Kimia
    Tafti, Seyed Mohsen Ahmadi
    Behboudi, Behnam
    Kazemeini, Alireza
    Keramati, Mohammad Reza
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 193 (06) : 2643 - 2652
  • [49] A predictive nomogram model for low anterior resection syndrome after rectal cancer resection
    Yan, Mingfang
    Lin, Zhenmeng
    Wu, Zhiying
    Zheng, Huizhe
    Shi, Meiqin
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 92 (12) : 3224 - 3231
  • [50] Laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: improving outcomes
    Christof Hottenrott
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2009, 23 : 2871 - 2873