Outcomes on diverting ostomy formation and reversal after low anterior resection in the older more advanced rectal cancer patient

被引:2
|
作者
Ketelaers, S. H. J. [1 ]
Orsini, R. G. [2 ]
Nieuwenhuijzen, G. A. P. [1 ]
Rutten, H. J. T. [1 ,3 ]
Burger, J. W. A. [1 ]
Bloemen, J. G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Catharina Hosp, Dept Surg, POB 1350, NL-5602 ZA Eindhoven, Netherlands
[2] ETZ Elisabeth TweeSteden Hosp, Dept Surg, Tilburg, Netherlands
[3] Maastricht Univ, Dept GROW, Sch Dev Biol & Oncol, Maastricht, Netherlands
来源
EJSO | 2022年 / 48卷 / 06期
关键词
Rectal cancer; Ostomy; Colostomy; Ileostomy; Surgery; Elderly; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; ANASTOMOTIC LEAKAGE; LOOP ILEOSTOMY; STOMA REVERSAL; DEFUNCTIONING STOMAS; RISK-FACTORS; COMPLICATIONS; MORTALITY; READMISSION; DEHYDRATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejso.2021.12.020
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: To decrease morbidity caused by anastomotic leakages after a low anterior resection (LAR) with primary anastomosis, a diverting ostomy is often created. Reversal of a diverting ostomy is associated with morbidity, which may result in non-reversal, particularly in the elderly. This study aimed to describe the diverting ostomy-related outcomes in elderly patients with more advanced rectal cancer after LAR. Materials and methods: All rectosigmoid and rectal cancer patients >= 70 years who underwent LAR with primary anastomosis between 2006 and 2019 in the Catharina Hospital (Eindhoven, The Netherlands) were included for analyses. Reversal rates, ostomy-related complications, morbidity and mortality after ostomy reversal, and definitive ostomy rates were evaluated. Results: In total 164 patients were included, of which 150 (91.5%) underwent primary or secondary ostomy creation. Ostomy-related complications were reported in 34.7% (95%-CI 27.1-42.9%). In total, 72.5% (95%-CI 64.2-79.7%) reversed their diverting ostomy. Non-reversal was mostly due to relapsing disease (52.6%). Median time to ostomy reversal was 3.2 months (IQR 2.3-5.0). No or minor complications after ostomy reversal were observed in 84.0% (95%-CI 75.3-90.6%). Over time, ostomy recreation was performed in 15.0% (95%-CI 8.6-23.5%), and ultimately 65.8% (95%-CI 57.8-73.2%) were ostomy-free after the median follow-up of 3.8 years. Conclusion: Although most elderly successfully reversed their diverting ostomy after LAR with limited morbidity, attention should be paid for the risk of non-reversal and ostomy recreation over time. Preoperative patient counselling is important in every individual to be able to decide if LAR with primary anastomosis or a permanent end colostomy is preferred. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd, BASO similar to The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1414 / 1420
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Do older Americans undergo stoma reversal following low anterior resection for rectal cancer?
    Dodgion, Christopher M.
    Neville, Bridget A.
    Lipsitz, Stuart R.
    Hu, Yue-Yung
    Schrag, Deborah
    Breen, Elizabeth
    Greenberg, Caprice C.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2013, 183 (01) : 238 - 245
  • [2] Predictors of High-Output Stoma After Low Anterior Resection With Diverting Ileostomy for Rectal Cancer
    Pak, Jongsung
    Uemura, Mamoru
    Fukuda, Yasunari
    Miyake, Masakazu
    Ikeda, Masataka
    Nishikawa, Kazuhiro
    Miyamoto, Atsushi
    Hirao, Motohiro
    Nakamori, Shoji
    Sekimoto, Mitsugu
    INTERNATIONAL SURGERY, 2017, 102 (7-8) : 313 - 317
  • [3] Loop ostomy following laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
    Wu, Xin
    Lin, Guole
    Qiu, Huizhong
    Xiao, Yi
    Wu, Bin
    Zhong, Miner
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2018, 23
  • [4] Is a diverting ostomy needed in mid-high rectal cancer patients undergoing a low anterior resection after neoadjuvant chemoradiation? An NSQIP analysis
    Messaris, Evangelos
    Connelly, Tara M.
    Kulaylat, Afif N.
    Miller, Jennifer
    Gusani, Niraj J.
    Ortenzi, Gail
    Wong, Joyce
    Bhayani, Neil
    SURGERY, 2015, 158 (03) : 686 - 691
  • [5] Risk factors of the low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) after ileostomy reversal in rectal cancer patient
    Zhang, Xuena
    Meng, Qingyu
    Du, Jianna
    Tian, Zhongtao
    Li, Yinju
    Yu, Bin
    Niu, Wenbo
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [6] Diverting Stoma After Low Anterior Resection: More Arguments in Favor
    Ulrich, Alexis B.
    Seiler, Christoph
    Rahbari, Nuh
    Weitz, Juergen
    Buechler, Markus W.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2009, 52 (03) : 412 - 418
  • [7] The application of defunctioning stomas after low anterior resection of rectal cancer
    Yao, Hongwei
    An, Yongbo
    Zhang, Zhongtao
    SURGERY TODAY, 2019, 49 (06) : 451 - 459
  • [8] Low or Ultralow Anterior Resection of Rectal Cancer Without Diverting Stoma: Experience with 28 Patients
    Soltani, E.
    Jangjoo, A.
    Saremi, E.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2015, 77 : S423 - S426
  • [9] Complications of Diverting Ileostomy after Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Carcinoma
    Maroney, Sean
    de Paz, Carlos Chavez
    Duldulao, Marjunphilip
    Kim, Tracey
    Reeves, Mark E.
    Kazanjian, Kevork K.
    Solomon, Naveenraj
    Garberoglio, Carlos
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2016, 82 (10) : 1033 - 1037
  • [10] Evaluation of Diverting Ileostomy in Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer
    Karahasanoglu, Tayfun
    Hamzaoglu, Ismail
    Baca, Bilgi
    Aytac, Erman
    Erenler, Ilknur
    Erdamar, Sibel
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2011, 34 (02) : 63 - 68