Intrastromal corneal ring segments: visual outcomes from a large case series

被引:42
作者
Ferrara, Guilherme [1 ,2 ]
Torquetti, Leonardo [1 ]
Ferrara, Paulo [1 ]
Merayo-Lloves, Jesus [2 ]
机构
[1] Paulo Ferrara Eye Clin, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
[2] Fernandez Vega Eye Inst, Oviedo, Spain
关键词
cornea; corneal topography; keratoconus; FEMTOSECOND LASER; KERATOCONUS; IMPLANTATION; ASPHERICITY; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1111/j.1442-9071.2011.02698.x
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Background: To evaluate the clinical safety and efficacy of implanted Ferrara intrastromal corneal ring segments in a large sample of patients with ectatic corneal disease. Design: Retrospective, consecutive case series. Samples: A total of 1073 eyes of 810 patients consecutively operated from January 2006 to July 2008 were evaluated. Methods: Two groups were created according to the type of ring implanted: Group 1 patients implanted with the 160 degrees of arc ring and Group 2 patients implanted with the 210 degrees of arc ring. Main Outcome Measures: Uncorrected visual acuity, best-corrected visual acuity, keratometry, asphericity and pachymetry at the thinnest point of the cornea. All patients were evaluated using a corneal tomography (Pentacam, Oculus, Inc., Lynnwood, WA, USA). Results: For Group 1 patients, uncorrected visual acuity increased to 20/80, best-corrected visual acuity increased to 20/40, asphericity decreased to -0.35, spherical equivalent decreased to -2.26 D and keratometry decreased to 45.72 D (P < 0.001 for each compared with preoperative values). For Group 2 patients, uncorrected visual acuity increased to 20/130, best-corrected visual acuity increased to 20/60, asphericity decreased to -0.56, spherical equivalent decreased to -4.14 D and keratometry decreased to 48.10 D (P < 0.001 for each compared with preoperative values). The 210 degrees intrastromal corneal ring segments reduced keratometry and asphericity more than the 160 degrees intrastromal corneal ring segments did. The complication rate was 3.82%. Conclusions: Ferrara intrastromal corneal ring segments implantation is safe and effective and has a low complication rate. It can effectively reduce the corneal steepening and improve uncorrected visual acuity and best-corrected visual acuity in patients with keratoconus.
引用
收藏
页码:433 / 439
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Intracorneal ring segments for keratoconus correction:: Long-term follow-up [J].
Alio, Jorge L. ;
Shabayek, Mohamed H. ;
Artola, Alberto .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2006, 32 (06) :978-985
[2]  
Barraquer J I, 1966, Int Ophthalmol Clin, V6, P53, DOI 10.1097/00004397-196606010-00004
[3]  
Barraquer JI, 1949, Oftalmologicas (Barcelona), V2, P10
[4]   CLASSIFICATION OF NORMAL CORNEAL TOPOGRAPHY BASED ON COMPUTER-ASSISTED VIDEOKERATOGRAPHY [J].
BOGAN, SJ ;
WARING, GO ;
IBRAHIM, O ;
DREWS, C ;
CURTIS, L .
ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1990, 108 (07) :945-949
[5]   Correcting keratoconus with intracorneal rings [J].
Colin, J ;
Cochener, B ;
Savary, G ;
Malet, F .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2000, 26 (08) :1117-1122
[6]   INTACS inserts for treating keratoconus - One-year results [J].
Colin, J ;
Cochener, B ;
Savary, G ;
Malet, F ;
Holmes-Higgin, D .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2001, 108 (08) :1409-1414
[7]   One-year results of intrastromal corneal ring segment implantation (KeraRing) using femtosecond laser in patients with keratoconus [J].
Coskunseven, Efekan ;
Kymionis, George D. ;
Tsiklis, Nikolaos S. ;
Atun, Serife ;
Arslan, Ebru ;
Jankov, Mirko R. ;
Pallikaris, Ioannis G. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2008, 145 (05) :775-779
[8]  
CUNHA PFD, 1995, REV BRAS OFTALMOL, V54, P577
[9]   Corneal asphericity and apical curvature in children: A cross-sectional and longitudinal evaluation [J].
Davis, WR ;
Raasch, TW ;
Mitchell, GL ;
Mutti, DO ;
Zadnik, K .
INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2005, 46 (06) :1899-1906
[10]   TOPOGRAPHIC DETERMINATION OF CORNEAL ASPHERICITY AND ITS LACK OF EFFECT ON THE REFRACTIVE OUTCOME OF RADIAL KERATOTOMY [J].
EGHBALI, F ;
YEUNG, KK ;
MALONEY, RK .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1995, 119 (03) :275-280