Effect size estimation: Methods and examples

被引:157
作者
Berben, Lut [2 ]
Sereika, Susan M. [3 ,4 ]
Engberg, Sandra [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Nursing, Dept Hlth Promot & Dev, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 USA
[2] Univ Basel, Inst Nursing Sci, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Nursing, Dept Hlth & Community Syst, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 USA
[4] Univ Pittsburgh, Grad Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 USA
关键词
Effect size; Methodology; Statistical calculations;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.01.015
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background: While the p-value will tell the reader a study's results are statistically significant, it does not provide any information about the practical or clinical importance of the findings. Furthermore, p-values are influenced by sample size. They are more likely to be significant when sample size is large and less likely if the sample is small. Effect size estimates, on the other hand, are not sensitive to sample size and provide information about the direction and strength of the relationship between variables (e.g., a treatment and an outcome). In addition to providing valuable clinical information about study findings, effect size estimates can provide a common metric to compare results across studies. Despite their usefulness, effect size estimates are often not reported as part of the research results. Consequently, effect sizes often have to be calculated based on summary and test statistics reported in research articles. Results: This article provides the formulas utilized to directly calculate common effective size estimates using summary statistics reported in research studies, as well as methods to more indirectly estimate these effect sizes when basis summary statistics are not reported. In addition we present formulas to compute the corresponding confidence interval for each effect size. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1039 / 1047
页数:9
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1988, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2009, HDB RES SYNTHESIS ME
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2009, INT STAT REV
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2010, Publication manual of the American Psychological Association, V6th
  • [5] [Anonymous], CONS TRANSP REP TRIA
  • [6] [Anonymous], INTERPRETATION PPT
  • [7] [Anonymous], AM PSYCHOL ASS D
  • [8] Pressure ulcers and incontinence-associated dermatitis: effectiveness of the Pressure Ulcer Classification education tool on classification by nurses
    Beeckman, Dimitri
    Schoonhoven, Lisette
    Fletcher, Jacqui
    Furtado, Katia
    Heyman, Hilde
    Paquay, Louis
    De Bacquer, Dirk
    Defloor, Tom
    [J]. QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2010, 19 (05):
  • [9] Czaja S., 2003, ALZHEIMERS CARE Q, V4, P229
  • [10] DURLAK JA, 1991, AM J COMMUN PSYCHOL, V19, P291