Is It Necessary to Free the Inferior Alveolar Nerve From the Proximal Segment in the Sagittal Split Osteotomy?

被引:20
作者
Susarla, Srinivas M. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Ettinger, Russell E. [1 ,2 ]
Dodson, Thomas B. [3 ]
机构
[1] Seattle Childrens Hosp, Craniofacial Ctr, Div Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Seattle, WA USA
[2] Seattle Childrens Hosp, Div Plast & Craniofacial Surg, Seattle, WA USA
[3] Univ Washington, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Sch Dent, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[4] Univ Washington, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Div Plast Surg, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
FUNCTIONAL SENSORY RECOVERY; RAMUS; GENIOPLASTY; IMPAIRMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.joms.2020.03.008
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: When the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) is contained within the proximal segment after a mandibular sagittal split osteotomy (SSO), conventional teaching is to release the nerve so that it freely enters the distal segment. However, manipulation of the IAN may cause further injury. The purpose of this study was to measure IAN neurosensory recovery in SSOs when the nerve was not freed from the proximal segment. Materials and Methods: This was a prospective split-mouth study of patients undergoing bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO). The sample was composed of patients who underwent a BSSO in which the IAN was intact bilaterally but freely entering the distal segment on one side (IANDI) and contained within the proximal segment on the other (IANPR). The outcome of interest was time to functional sensory recovery (FSR) of the IAN, measured in days. Descriptive, bivariate, and Kaplan-Meier statistics were computed. P <= .05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Twenty patients undergoing 40 SSOs were included as study patients. The sample's mean age was 19.0 +/- 2.4 years (range, 15 to 26 years); there were 13 female patients. Of these patients, 15 under-went BSSO whereas 5 underwent BSSO plus genioplasty. The planned mean composite 3-dimensional mandibular movements for IAN(DI) and IAN(PR) were 6.3 +/- 2.8 mm (range, 2.5 to 12.3 mm) and 6.3 +/- 2.3 mm (range, 2.7 to 10.8 mm), respectively (P = .96). All patients achieved FSR in the bilateral IAN distributions within 1 year of surgery (range, 34 to 284 days). The median times to FSR were 100 days for IAN(DI) and 101 days for IAN(PR) (P = .64). Conclusions: In patients undergoing SSOs, maintaining the IAN within the proximal segment of the mandible may not affect neurosensory recovery. (C) 2020 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
引用
收藏
页码:1382 / 1388
页数:7
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
Antony P G, 2017, J Oral Biol Craniofac Res, V7, P81, DOI 10.1016/j.jobcr.2017.03.004
[2]   Neurosensory deficit and functional impairment after sagittal ramus osteotomy: A long-term follow-up study [J].
August, M ;
Marchena, J ;
Donady, J ;
Kaban, L .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1998, 56 (11) :1231-1235
[3]   Inferior alveolar nerve impairment after mandibular sagittal split osteotomy: An analysis of spontaneous recovery patterns observed in 60 patients [J].
Becelli, R ;
Renzi, G ;
Carboni, A ;
Cerulli, G ;
Gasparini, G .
JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2002, 13 (02) :315-320
[4]   The Modifications of the Sagittal Ramus Split Osteotomy: A Literature Review [J].
Bockmann, Roland ;
Meyns, Joeri ;
Dik, Eric ;
Kessler, Peter .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2014, 2 (12)
[5]   Is injury to the inferior alveolar nerve still common during orthognathic surgery? Manual twist technique for sagittal split ramus osteotomy [J].
Choi, Bong-Kyoon ;
Lee, Won ;
Lo, Lun-Jou ;
Yang, Eun-Jung .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2018, 56 (10) :946-951
[6]   Risk Factors Influencing Recovery of Neurosensory Disturbances Following Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy [J].
Demirbas, Ahmet Emin ;
Yilmaz, Gokhan ;
Topan, Cihan ;
Kutuk, Nukhet ;
Kilic, Erdem ;
Alkan, Alper .
JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2020, 31 (01) :E35-E38
[7]   Recommendations for management of trigeminal nerve defects based on a critical appraisal of the literature [J].
Dodson, TB ;
Kaban, LB .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1997, 55 (12) :1380-1386
[8]   What Factors Are Associated With Functional Sensory Recovery Following Lingual Nerve Repair? [J].
Fagin, Adam P. ;
Susarla, Srinivas M. ;
Donoff, Robert B. ;
Kaban, Leonard B. ;
Dodson, Thomas B. .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2012, 70 (12) :2907-2915
[9]   Sensitivity of the inferior lip and chin following mandibular bilateral sagittal split osteotomy using piezosurgery [J].
Geha, Hadi J. ;
Gleizal, Arnaud M. ;
Nimeskern, NicolasJ. ;
Beziat, Jean-Luc .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2006, 118 (07) :1598-1607
[10]   Neurosensory alterations of the inferior alveolar and mental nerve after genioplasty alone or associated with sagittal osteotomy of the mandibular ramus [J].
Gianni, AB ;
D'Orto, O ;
Biglioli, F ;
Bozzetti, A ;
Brusati, R .
JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2002, 30 (05) :295-303