Laboratory Evaluation of Flow Sensor Technology for Use in Storm Sewer Measurements

被引:0
|
作者
Aguilar, Marcus F. [1 ]
McDonald, Walter M. [1 ]
Dymond, Randel L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Virginia Tech, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
来源
WORLD ENVIRONMENTAL AND WATER RESOURCES CONGRESS 2015: FLOODS, DROUGHTS, AND ECOSYSTEMS | 2015年
关键词
Hydrology; Stormwater monitoring; Uncertainty; Sensors; Instrumentation; GOODNESS-OF-FIT; UNCERTAINTY; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Accurate, accessible, and effective measurements of water depth and velocity are critical for developing hydrologic and hydraulic models that effectively characterize urban stormwater drainage systems. Well-informed decisions are contingent on the quality of hydrologic and hydraulic measurements, and while numerous technologies for flow quantification are available, information on their general applicability for stormwater measurements is lacking. This paper describes the laboratory measures taken prior to the field installation of several water quantity measurement sensors to ascertain the suitability of the devices for their intended use. Testing these devices in a controlled laboratory flume allows for observational and quantitative evaluation of a sensor's ability to perform in a storm sewer pipe. The testing and evaluation methods, and results of testing on several popular depth and velocity sensors are presented in order to provide recommendations for storm sewer authorities, researchers, and others that want to quantify storm sewer discharge, but do not have the facilities necessary to perform front-end testing of devices. Outcomes include evaluation of within-sensor variance, comparison of sensor performance between various stage and velocity technologies and manufacturers, and recommendations for sensor evaluation procedures, and general cautions before deployment in a stormwater system.
引用
收藏
页码:2579 / 2589
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Benchmarking laboratory observation uncertainty for in-pipe storm sewer discharge measurements
    Aguilar, Marcus F.
    McDonald, Walter M.
    Dymond, Randel L.
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2016, 534 : 73 - 86
  • [2] Verification of flow measurements in sewer systems by means of Rhodamine WT tracing experiments
    Lepot, Mathieu
    Kouyi, Gislain Lipeme
    Bertrand-Krajewski, Jean-Luc
    HOUILLE BLANCHE-REVUE INTERNATIONALE DE L EAU, 2011, (04): : 43 - 48
  • [3] Evaluation of Sensor and Environmental Factors Impacting the Use of Multiple Sensor Data for Time-Series Applications
    Rengarajan, Rajagopalan
    Schott, John R.
    REMOTE SENSING, 2018, 10 (11):
  • [4] Global evaluation and sensitivity analysis of a physically based flow and reactive transport model on a laboratory experiment
    Gatel, Laura
    Lauvernet, Claire
    Carluer, Nadia
    Weill, Sylvain
    Tournebize, Julien
    Paniconi, Claudio
    ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2019, 113 : 73 - 83
  • [5] An evaluation of the impacts of land surface modification, storm sewer development, and rainfall variation on waterlogging risk in Shanghai
    Wu, Xiaodan
    Yu, Dapeng
    Chen, Zhongyuan
    Wilby, Robert L.
    NATURAL HAZARDS, 2012, 63 (02) : 305 - 323
  • [6] THE USE OF SENSOR TECHNOLOGY IN CROP PROTECTION
    Petrovic, Davor
    Banaj, Duro
    Banaj, Anamarija
    Knezevic, Dario
    Tadic, Vjekoslav
    ACTUAL TASKS ON AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING (ATAE 2021), 2021, 48 : 341 - 346
  • [7] Vertical jumping biomechanical evaluation through the use of an inertial sensor-based technology
    Setuain, I.
    Martinikorena, J.
    Gonzalez-Izal, M.
    Martinez-Ramirez, A.
    Gomez, M.
    Alfaro-Adrian, J.
    Izquierdo, M.
    JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCES, 2016, 34 (09) : 843 - 851
  • [8] Use of Sensor Technology to Explore the Science of Touch
    Salud, Lawrence H.
    Pugh, Carla M.
    MEDICINE MEETS VIRTUAL REALITY 18, 2011, 163 : 542 - 548
  • [9] The ethics of sensor technology use in clinical research
    Ulrich, Connie M.
    Demiris, George
    Kennedy, Rosemary
    Rothwell, Erin
    NURSING OUTLOOK, 2020, 68 (06) : 720 - 726