The Science of Training and Development in Organizations: What Matters in Practice

被引:512
作者
Salas, Eduardo [1 ,2 ]
Tannenbaum, Scott I. [3 ]
Kraiger, Kurt [4 ]
Smith-Jentsch, Kimberly A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cent Florida, Inst Simulat & Training, Orlando, FL 32826 USA
[2] Univ Cent Florida, Dept Psychol, Orlando, FL 32826 USA
[3] Grp Org Effectiveness, Albany, NY USA
[4] Colorado State Univ, Dept Psychol, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
基金
美国国家航空航天局;
关键词
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT-PRACTICES; PROMPTING SELF-REGULATION; GOAL ORIENTATION; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; DRIVING SIMULATOR; LEARNING OUTCOMES; TEAM PERFORMANCE; RISK AWARENESS; REAL-WORLD; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1177/1529100612436661
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Organizations in the United States alone spend billions on training each year. These training and development activities allow organizations to adapt, compete, excel, innovate, produce, be safe, improve service, and reach goals. Training has successfully been used to reduce errors in such high-risk settings as emergency rooms, aviation, and the military. However, training is also important in more conventional organizations. These organizations understand that training helps them to remain competitive by continually educating their workforce. They understand that investing in their employees yields greater results. However, training is not as intuitive as it may seem. There is a science of training that shows that there is a right way and a wrong way to design, deliver, and implement a training program. The research on training clearly shows two things: (a) training works, and (b) the way training is designed, delivered, and implemented matters. This article aims to explain why training is important and how to use training appropriately. Using the training literature as a guide, we explain what training is, why it is important, and provide recommendations for implementing a training program in an organization. In particular, we argue that training is a systematic process, and we explain what matters before, during, and after training. Steps to take at each of these three time periods are listed and described and are summarized in a checklist for ease of use. We conclude with a discussion of implications for both leaders and policymakers and an exploration of issues that may come up when deciding to implement a training program. Furthermore, we include key questions that executives and policymakers should ask about the design, delivery, or implementation of a training program. Finally, we consider future research that is important in this area, including some still unanswered questions and room for development in this evolving field.
引用
收藏
页码:74 / 101
页数:28
相关论文
共 202 条
[2]   Benefits of Training and Development for Individuals and Teams, Organizations, and Society [J].
Aguinis, Herman ;
Kraiger, Kurt .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 60 :451-474
[3]   MAINTENANCE TRAINING SIMULATOR FIDELITY AND INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES IN TRANSFER OF TRAINING [J].
ALLEN, JA ;
HAYS, RT ;
BUFFARDI, LC .
HUMAN FACTORS, 1986, 28 (05) :497-509
[4]   After-action reviews: A venue for the promotion of safety climate [J].
Allen, Joseph A. ;
Baran, Benjamin E. ;
Scott, Cliff W. .
ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2010, 42 (02) :750-757
[5]   KIRKPATRICK LEVELS OF TRAINING CRITERIA - 30 YEARS LATER [J].
ALLIGER, GM ;
JANAK, EA .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 1989, 42 (02) :331-342
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Handbook of applied cognition
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1997, Naturalistic decision making
[8]  
[Anonymous], ANN REV PSYCHOL
[9]  
[Anonymous], 1999, ERR IS HUMAN BUILDIN
[10]  
[Anonymous], J E W BUSINESS