Greenhouse gas emissions of forest bioenergy supply and utilization in Finland

被引:55
|
作者
Eero, Jappinen [1 ]
Olli-Jussi, Korpinen [1 ]
Juha, Laitila [2 ]
Tapio, Ranta [1 ]
机构
[1] Lappeenranta Univ Technol, Mikkeli 50130, Finland
[2] Finnish Forest Res Inst, Joensuu 80101, Finland
来源
关键词
Bioenergy; Life cycle assessment; Greenhouse gas emissions; Feedstock; Sustainability; Forest biomass; Supply chain; CARBON-DIOXIDE EMISSIONS; LOGGING RESIDUES; ENERGY WOOD; STORAGE; BIOMASS; IMPACT; TRANSPORTATION; DECOMPOSITION; ELECTRICITY; BALANCES;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.101
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The paper assesses greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of forest bioenergy supply and utilization in Finland. Each step in the supply chains of harvesting residues (HR), small-diameter energy wood (EW) and stumps (ST) is assessed separately, with geography-related differences between Northern and Southern Finland (NF and SF) taken into consideration. Furthermore, the GHG performance of five distinct bioenergy options-(1) combined heat and power production, (2) condensing power production, (3) torrefied pellets, (4) gasification, and (5) pyrolysis oil production-is assessed and compared with that of current reference systems in Finland and also the European Union (EU) sustainability criteria. If soil carbon stock (SCS) changes and possible storage emissions are omitted, the GHG emissions deriving from the supply chain of comminuted forest biomass to plants are 2.4, 3.0, and 2.6 gCO(2)eq MJ(-1) for HR, EW, and ST in SF, respectively. In NE, the corresponding values are 2.9, 3.6, and 3.2 gCO(2)eq MJ(-1), respectively. If SCS changes and possible emissions from storage are accounted for, the emissions for HR, EW, and ST are in the ranges 9.2-49.2, 24.4-64.4, and 33.1-73.1 gCO(2)eq MJ(-1) in SF and 12.7-52.7, 29.4-69.4, and 39.5-79.5 gCO(2)eq MJ(-1) in NF. Most supply-chain GHG emissions arise from SCS changes and possible emissions from storage of comminuted biomass, both of which may involve significant uncertainty factors. In comparison to local reference systems, significant GHG savings can be achieved through energy utilization of forest biomass, but if SCS changes and, in particular, storage emissions are taken into account, fulfillment of the EU sustainability criteria is not guaranteed. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:369 / 382
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Land Quality and Management Practices Strongly Affect Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Bioenergy Feedstocks
    Wightman, Jenifer L.
    Duxbury, John M.
    Woodbury, Peter B.
    BIOENERGY RESEARCH, 2015, 8 (04) : 1681 - 1690
  • [32] Can biochar reduce soil greenhouse gas emissions from a Miscanthus bioenergy crop?
    Case, Sean D. C.
    McNamara, Niall P.
    Reay, David S.
    Whitaker, Jeanette
    GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY, 2014, 6 (01): : 76 - 89
  • [33] Land Quality and Management Practices Strongly Affect Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Bioenergy Feedstocks
    Jenifer L. Wightman
    John M. Duxbury
    Peter B. Woodbury
    BioEnergy Research, 2015, 8 : 1681 - 1690
  • [34] Bioenergy by-products as soil amendments? Implications for carbon sequestration and greenhouse gas emissions
    Cayuela, M. L.
    Oenema, O.
    Kuikman, P. J.
    Bakker, R. R.
    van Groenigen, J. W.
    GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY, 2010, 2 (04): : 201 - 213
  • [35] The potential for bioenergy generated on marginal land to offset agricultural greenhouse gas emissions in China
    Yu, Ziyue
    Zhang, Fan
    Gao, Chenzhen
    Mangi, Eugenio
    Ali, Cheshmehzangi
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2024, 189
  • [36] Greenhouse gas emissions from final harvest fuel chip production in Finland
    Wihersaari, M
    BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2005, 28 (05): : 435 - 443
  • [37] Peat-based emissions in Finland's national greenhouse gas inventory
    Lapvetelainen, Tuija
    Regina, Kristiina
    Perala, Paula
    BOREAL ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH, 2007, 12 (02): : 225 - 236
  • [38] Life-Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Forest Bioenergy Production at Combined Heat and Power Projects in Nova Scotia, Canada
    Steenberg, James W. N.
    Laganiere, Jerome
    Ayer, Nathan W.
    Duinker, Peter N.
    FOREST SCIENCE, 2023, 69 (03) : 286 - 298
  • [39] A Review on Water-Energy-Greenhouse Gas Nexus of the Bioenergy Supply and Production System
    Zahraee S.M.
    Shiwakoti N.
    Stasinopoulos P.
    Current Sustainable/Renewable Energy Reports, 2020, 7 (02): : 28 - 39
  • [40] A global meta-analysis of forest bioenergy greenhouse gas emission accounting studies
    Buchholz, Thomas
    Hurteau, Matthew D.
    Gunn, John
    Saah, David
    GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY, 2016, 8 (02): : 281 - 289