Greenhouse gas emissions of forest bioenergy supply and utilization in Finland

被引:55
|
作者
Eero, Jappinen [1 ]
Olli-Jussi, Korpinen [1 ]
Juha, Laitila [2 ]
Tapio, Ranta [1 ]
机构
[1] Lappeenranta Univ Technol, Mikkeli 50130, Finland
[2] Finnish Forest Res Inst, Joensuu 80101, Finland
来源
关键词
Bioenergy; Life cycle assessment; Greenhouse gas emissions; Feedstock; Sustainability; Forest biomass; Supply chain; CARBON-DIOXIDE EMISSIONS; LOGGING RESIDUES; ENERGY WOOD; STORAGE; BIOMASS; IMPACT; TRANSPORTATION; DECOMPOSITION; ELECTRICITY; BALANCES;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.101
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The paper assesses greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of forest bioenergy supply and utilization in Finland. Each step in the supply chains of harvesting residues (HR), small-diameter energy wood (EW) and stumps (ST) is assessed separately, with geography-related differences between Northern and Southern Finland (NF and SF) taken into consideration. Furthermore, the GHG performance of five distinct bioenergy options-(1) combined heat and power production, (2) condensing power production, (3) torrefied pellets, (4) gasification, and (5) pyrolysis oil production-is assessed and compared with that of current reference systems in Finland and also the European Union (EU) sustainability criteria. If soil carbon stock (SCS) changes and possible storage emissions are omitted, the GHG emissions deriving from the supply chain of comminuted forest biomass to plants are 2.4, 3.0, and 2.6 gCO(2)eq MJ(-1) for HR, EW, and ST in SF, respectively. In NE, the corresponding values are 2.9, 3.6, and 3.2 gCO(2)eq MJ(-1), respectively. If SCS changes and possible emissions from storage are accounted for, the emissions for HR, EW, and ST are in the ranges 9.2-49.2, 24.4-64.4, and 33.1-73.1 gCO(2)eq MJ(-1) in SF and 12.7-52.7, 29.4-69.4, and 39.5-79.5 gCO(2)eq MJ(-1) in NF. Most supply-chain GHG emissions arise from SCS changes and possible emissions from storage of comminuted biomass, both of which may involve significant uncertainty factors. In comparison to local reference systems, significant GHG savings can be achieved through energy utilization of forest biomass, but if SCS changes and, in particular, storage emissions are taken into account, fulfillment of the EU sustainability criteria is not guaranteed. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:369 / 382
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The role of technology development in greenhouse gas emissions reduction:: The case of Finland
    Lehtilä, A
    Savolainen, I
    Syri, S
    ENERGY, 2005, 30 (14) : 2738 - 2758
  • [22] Greenhouse gas emissions from cultivated and abandoned organic croplands in Finland
    Maljanen, Marja
    Hytonen, Jyrki
    Makiranta, Paivi
    Alm, Jukka
    Minkkinen, Kari
    Laine, Jukka
    Martikainen, Pertti J.
    BOREAL ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH, 2007, 12 (02): : 133 - 140
  • [23] Energy and greenhouse gas balance of the use of forest residues for bioenergy production in the UK
    Whittaker, Carly
    Mortimer, Nigel
    Murphy, Richard
    Matthews, Robert
    BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2011, 35 (11): : 4581 - 4594
  • [24] Greenhouse gas emissions from the use of primary energy in forest operations and long-distance transportation of timber in Finland
    Karjalainen, T
    Asikainen, A
    FORESTRY, 1996, 69 (03): : 215 - 228
  • [25] Reducing greenhouse gas emissions from electricity supply in Australia
    Schaap, H
    Mcmullan, P
    GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, 2001, : 795 - 802
  • [26] Contribution of Urban Water Supply to Greenhouse Gas Emissions in China
    Smith, Kate
    Liu, Shuming
    Chang, Tian
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2016, 20 (04) : 792 - 802
  • [27] Supply chain leakage of greenhouse gas emissions and supplier innovation
    Song, Sining
    Dong, Yan
    Kull, Thomas
    Carter, Craig
    Xu, Kefeng
    PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2023, 32 (03) : 882 - 903
  • [28] Greenhouse gas emissions of tomato production and supply: A systematic review
    Zhu, Zhu
    Miller, Shelie A.
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2025, 218
  • [29] ACCOUNTING AND REPORTING OF HARMFUL GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS BY FOREST ENTERPRISES
    Pozharevska, Roumiana
    Bacheva, Snejana
    WOODEMA 2024 - GREEN DEAL INITIATIVES, SUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENT, MARKET DEMANDS, AND NEW PRODUCTION PERSPECTIVES IN THE FORESTRY-BASED SECTOR, 2024, : 295 - 300
  • [30] What is the most appropriate LCA method for measuring greenhouse gas emissions from bioenergy?
    Aylott, Matthew
    Higson, Adrian
    Evans, Geraint
    Hamer, Alison
    Mortimer, Nigel
    BIOFUELS BIOPRODUCTS & BIOREFINING-BIOFPR, 2011, 5 (02): : 122 - 124