Greenhouse gas emissions of forest bioenergy supply and utilization in Finland

被引:55
|
作者
Eero, Jappinen [1 ]
Olli-Jussi, Korpinen [1 ]
Juha, Laitila [2 ]
Tapio, Ranta [1 ]
机构
[1] Lappeenranta Univ Technol, Mikkeli 50130, Finland
[2] Finnish Forest Res Inst, Joensuu 80101, Finland
来源
关键词
Bioenergy; Life cycle assessment; Greenhouse gas emissions; Feedstock; Sustainability; Forest biomass; Supply chain; CARBON-DIOXIDE EMISSIONS; LOGGING RESIDUES; ENERGY WOOD; STORAGE; BIOMASS; IMPACT; TRANSPORTATION; DECOMPOSITION; ELECTRICITY; BALANCES;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.101
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The paper assesses greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of forest bioenergy supply and utilization in Finland. Each step in the supply chains of harvesting residues (HR), small-diameter energy wood (EW) and stumps (ST) is assessed separately, with geography-related differences between Northern and Southern Finland (NF and SF) taken into consideration. Furthermore, the GHG performance of five distinct bioenergy options-(1) combined heat and power production, (2) condensing power production, (3) torrefied pellets, (4) gasification, and (5) pyrolysis oil production-is assessed and compared with that of current reference systems in Finland and also the European Union (EU) sustainability criteria. If soil carbon stock (SCS) changes and possible storage emissions are omitted, the GHG emissions deriving from the supply chain of comminuted forest biomass to plants are 2.4, 3.0, and 2.6 gCO(2)eq MJ(-1) for HR, EW, and ST in SF, respectively. In NE, the corresponding values are 2.9, 3.6, and 3.2 gCO(2)eq MJ(-1), respectively. If SCS changes and possible emissions from storage are accounted for, the emissions for HR, EW, and ST are in the ranges 9.2-49.2, 24.4-64.4, and 33.1-73.1 gCO(2)eq MJ(-1) in SF and 12.7-52.7, 29.4-69.4, and 39.5-79.5 gCO(2)eq MJ(-1) in NF. Most supply-chain GHG emissions arise from SCS changes and possible emissions from storage of comminuted biomass, both of which may involve significant uncertainty factors. In comparison to local reference systems, significant GHG savings can be achieved through energy utilization of forest biomass, but if SCS changes and, in particular, storage emissions are taken into account, fulfillment of the EU sustainability criteria is not guaranteed. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:369 / 382
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Understanding the timing and variation of greenhouse gas emissions of forest bioenergy systems
    Roder, Mirjam
    Thiffault, Evelyne
    Martinez-Alonso, Celia
    Senez-Gagnon, Fanny
    Paradis, Laurence
    Thornley, Patricia
    BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2019, 121 : 99 - 114
  • [2] Trade in bioenergy and greenhouse gas emissions
    Bourgeon, Jean-Marc
    Olliviery, Helene
    REVUE ECONOMIQUE, 2010, 61 (01): : 183 - 212
  • [3] Comparison of greenhouse gas emissions from forest operations in Finland and Sweden
    Berg, S
    Karjalainen, T
    FORESTRY, 2003, 76 (03): : 271 - 284
  • [4] Forest carbon accounting methods and the consequences of forest bioenergy for national greenhouse gas emissions inventories
    McKechnie, Jon
    Colombo, Steve
    MacLean, Heather L.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2014, 44 : 164 - 173
  • [5] Greenhouse gas emissions and removals in Finland
    Pipatti, Riitta
    VTT Tiedotteita - Valtion Teknillinen Tutkimuskeskus, 2001, (2094): : 8 - 59
  • [6] Greenhouse Gas Emissions of the Forest Supply Chain in Austria in the Year 2018
    Kuhmaier, Martin
    Kral, Iris
    Kanzian, Christian
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (02)
  • [7] Role of forest sector and bioenergy in limiting the carbon emissions of Finland
    Pingoud, K
    Lehtila, A
    BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 1997, 13 (06): : 413 - 420
  • [8] Greenhouse gas emissions of bioenergy from agriculture compared to fossil energy for heat and electricity supply
    Jungmeier, G
    Spitzer, J
    NUTRIENT CYCLING IN AGROECOSYSTEMS, 2001, 60 (1-3) : 267 - 273
  • [9] Greenhouse gas emissions of bioenergy from agriculture compared to fossil energy for heat and electricity supply
    G. Jungmeier
    J. Spitzer
    Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 2001, 60 : 267 - 273
  • [10] Tropical forest fragmentation and greenhouse gas emissions
    Laurance, WF
    Laurance, SG
    Delamonica, P
    FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 1998, 110 (1-3) : 173 - 180