Juan Linz, presidentialism, and democracy - A critical appraisal

被引:114
作者
Mainwaring, S [1 ]
Shugart, MS [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV CALIF SAN DIEGO,GRAD SCH INT RELAT & PACIFIC STUDIES,LA JOLLA,CA 92093
关键词
D O I
10.2307/422014
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
The perils of presidential systems are not as great as Juan Lint has argued. Presidentialism is less oriented toward winner-takes-al results than Westminster parliamentary systems. The superior record of parliamentary systems has rested partly on where they have been implemented, and presidentialism has some advantages that partially offset its drawbacks. These advantages can be maximized by paying careful attention to differences among presidential systems. Finally, switching from presidential to parliamentary systems could exacerbate problems of governability in countries with undisciplined parties. Even if parliamentary government is more conducive to stable democracy, much rests on what kind of parliamentary or presidential system is implemented.
引用
收藏
页码:449 / &
页数:24
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1989, DEMOCRACY DEV COUNTR
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1992, REEXAMINING DEMOCRAC
[3]   POLITICAL DEMOCRACY AND THE TIMING OF DEVELOPMENT [J].
BOLLEN, KA .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1979, 44 (04) :572-587
[4]  
Ceaser James, 1986, SEPARATION POWERS DO, P169
[5]  
Dahl R., 1973, POLYARCHY PARTICIPAT, P62
[6]   A COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF CANADIAN PARTIES [J].
EPSTEIN, LD .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 1964, 58 (01) :46-59
[7]  
Horowitz DonaldL., 1990, J DEMOCR, V1, P73, DOI [DOI 10.1353/JOD.1990.0056, 10.1353/jod.1990.0056]
[8]  
Jones MarkP., 1995, ELECTORAL LAWS SURVI
[9]  
LIJPHART A, PRESIDENTIALISM MAJO
[10]  
LIJPHART Arend., 1984, Democracies: patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus in Twenty - One Countries, P1