How seasonal temperature or water inputs affect the relative response of C3 crops to elevated [CO2]: a global analysis of open top chamber and free air CO2 enrichment studies

被引:58
作者
Bishop, Kristen [1 ,2 ]
Leakey, Andrew [1 ,2 ]
Ainsworth, Elizabeth [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Plant Biol, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Inst Genom Biol, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[3] USDA ARS, Global Change & Photosynth Res Unit, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
来源
FOOD AND ENERGY SECURITY | 2014年 / 3卷 / 01期
关键词
Climate change; crop yield; food security; CARBON-DIOXIDE; YIELD STIMULATION; LIMITING NITROGEN; CLIMATE-CHANGE; EXTREME HEAT; RISING CO2; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; METAANALYSIS; PRODUCTIVITY; FACE;
D O I
10.1002/fes3.44
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Rising atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration ([CO2]) has the potential to positively impact C-3 food crop production by directly stimulating photosynthetic carbon gain (A), which leads to increased crop biomass and yield. Further stimulation of A and yield can result from an indirect mechanism in which elevated [CO2] decreases stomatal conductance and canopy water use, ameliorating drought stress. Experiments in open top chambers (OTC) and free air CO2 enrichment (FACE) facilities have enabled investigation of crop responses to elevated [CO2] in near natural, field conditions. Mechanistic understanding of physiological responses to elevated [CO2] has led to predictions that the stimulation of A, biomass production, and economic yield will vary with the temperature and water supply experienced by the crop. This study tested current assumptions about the relationships between relative responses of yield and biomass to elevated [CO2] and variation in growing season temperature and water inputs (precipitation plus irrigation). Growing season average temperature was not a good predictor of the magnitude of biomass and yield responses to elevated [CO2], contradicting the prediction that responses to elevated [CO2] would increase with increasing temperature due to the greater benefit from decreasing photorespiration. However, the prediction that the relative stimulation of yield by elevated [CO2] would be greatest in dry conditions was generally supported. Thus, a simple CO2 fertilization value is not appropriate for modeling future crop productivity under varying environmental conditions. Further studies are necessary across a broader range of environmental conditions in order to accurately predict how rising [CO2] will interact with temperature and drought stress and alter future crop production.
引用
收藏
页码:33 / 45
页数:13
相关论文
共 69 条
  • [31] Plant reproduction under elevated CO2 conditions:: a meta-analysis of reports on 79 crop and wild species
    Jablonski, LM
    Wang, XZ
    Curtis, PS
    [J]. NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 2002, 156 (01) : 9 - 26
  • [32] THE CO2/O2 SPECIFICITY OF RIBULOSE 1,5-BISPHOSPHATE CARBOXYLASE OXYGENASE - DEPENDENCE ON RIBULOSEBISPHOSPHATE CONCENTRATION, PH AND TEMPERATURE
    JORDAN, DB
    OGREN, WL
    [J]. PLANTA, 1984, 161 (04) : 308 - 313
  • [33] Productivity and water use of wheat under free-air CO2 enrichment
    Kimball, BA
    Pinter, PJ
    Garcia, RL
    LaMorte, RL
    Wall, GW
    Hunsaker, DJ
    Wechsung, G
    Wechsung, F
    Kartschall, T
    [J]. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 1995, 1 (06) : 429 - 442
  • [34] Responses of agricultural crops to free-air CO2 enrichment
    Kimball, BA
    Kobayashi, K
    Bindi, M
    [J]. ADVANCES IN AGRONOMY, VOL 77, 2002, 77 : 293 - 368
  • [36] THE EFFECTS OF INCREASING CO2 ON CROP PHOTOSYNTHESIS AND PRODUCTIVITY - A REVIEW OF FIELD STUDIES
    LAWLOR, DW
    MITCHELL, RAC
    [J]. PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT, 1991, 14 (08) : 807 - 818
  • [37] Trends in the sources and sinks of carbon dioxide
    Le Quere, Corinne
    Raupach, Michael R.
    Canadell, Josep G.
    Marland, Gregg
    Bopp, Laurent
    Ciais, Philippe
    Conway, Thomas J.
    Doney, Scott C.
    Feely, Richard A.
    Foster, Pru
    Friedlingstein, Pierre
    Gurney, Kevin
    Houghton, Richard A.
    House, Joanna I.
    Huntingford, Chris
    Levy, Peter E.
    Lomas, Mark R.
    Majkut, Joseph
    Metzl, Nicolas
    Ometto, Jean P.
    Peters, Glen P.
    Prentice, I. Colin
    Randerson, James T.
    Running, Steven W.
    Sarmiento, Jorge L.
    Schuster, Ute
    Sitch, Stephen
    Takahashi, Taro
    Viovy, Nicolas
    van der Werf, Guido R.
    Woodward, F. Ian
    [J]. NATURE GEOSCIENCE, 2009, 2 (12) : 831 - 836
  • [38] A multi-biome gap in understanding of crop and ecosystem responses to elevated CO2
    Leakey, Andrew D. B.
    Bishop, Kristen A.
    Ainsworth, Elizabeth A.
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN PLANT BIOLOGY, 2012, 15 (03) : 228 - 236
  • [39] Evolutionary context for understanding and manipulating plant responses to past, present and future atmospheric [CO2]
    Leakey, Andrew D. B.
    Lau, Jennifer A.
    [J]. PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2012, 367 (1588) : 613 - 629
  • [40] Elevated CO2 effects on plant carbon, nitrogen, and water relations: six important lessons from FACE
    Leakey, Andrew D. B.
    Ainsworth, Elizabeth A.
    Bernacchi, Carl J.
    Rogers, Alistair
    Long, Stephen P.
    Ort, Donald R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 2009, 60 (10) : 2859 - 2876