Sacral neuromodulation for urinary retention

被引:70
作者
Kessler, Thomas M. [1 ]
Fowler, Clare J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coll London Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Natl Hosp Neurol & Neurosurg, Dept Uroneurol, London WC1N 3BG, England
来源
NATURE CLINICAL PRACTICE UROLOGY | 2008年 / 5卷 / 12期
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
efficacy and safety; mechanism of action; sacral neuromodulation; urinary retention;
D O I
10.1038/ncpuro1251
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Urinary retention without an identifiable urological cause presents a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. Patients with nonobstructive chronic urinary retention usually have to rely on intermittent self-catheterization or indwelling suprapubic or transurethral catheters, which significantly affect quality of life. For some patients, however, sacral neuromodulation (SNM) offers an effective therapeutic alternative, and women with primary disorder of urethral sphincter relaxation (Fowler's syndrome) seem to respond particularly well to this treatment. Although the mechanism of action of SNM is not well understood and requires further investigation, it seems to involve afferent mediation of spinal cord reflexes and brain networks. The evolution of SNM devices and improvements in surgical and testing techniques, especially the introduction of the two-stage tined lead procedure, have considerably reduced the failure, adverse event and surgical revision rates associated with SNM, ensuring that this modality is an effective minimally invasive treatment for urinary retention.
引用
收藏
页码:657 / 666
页数:10
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]   Sacral neuromodulation as an effective treatment for refractory pelvic floor dysfunction [J].
Aboseif, S ;
Tamaddon, K ;
Chalfin, S ;
Freedman, S ;
Kaptein, J .
UROLOGY, 2002, 60 (01) :52-56
[2]   Sacral neuromodulation in functional urinary retention: an effective way to restore voiding [J].
Aboseif, S ;
Tamaddon, K ;
Chalfin, S ;
Freedman, S ;
Mourad, MS ;
Chang, JH ;
Kaptein, JS .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2002, 90 (07) :662-665
[3]   Sacral neuromodulation: Cost considerations and clinical benefits [J].
Aboself, Sherif R. ;
Kim, Dennis H. ;
Rieder, Jocelyn M. ;
Rhee, Eugene Y. ;
Menefee, Shawn A. ;
Kaswick, Julie R. ;
Ree, Michael H. .
UROLOGY, 2007, 70 (06) :1069-1073
[4]  
Abrams P, 2002, NEUROUROL URODYNAM, V21, P167, DOI 10.1002/nau.10052
[5]  
Bannowsky A, 2003, UROLOGE A, V42, P1357, DOI 10.1007/s00120-003-0343-2
[6]   Different brain effects during chronic and acute sacral neuromodulation in urge incontinent patients with implanted neurostimulators [J].
Blok, Bertil F. M. ;
Groen, Jan ;
Bosch, J. L. H. Ruud ;
Veltman, Dick J. ;
Lammertsma, Adriaan A. .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2006, 98 (06) :1238-1243
[7]   Predicting implantation with a neuromodulator using two different test stimulation techniques: A prospective randomized study in urge incontinent women [J].
Borawski, Kristy M. ;
Foster, Raymond T. ;
Webster, George D. ;
Amundsen, Cindy L. .
NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2007, 26 (01) :14-18
[8]   Sacral nerve neuromodulation in the treatment of patients with refractory motor urge incontinence: Longterm results of a prospective longitudinal study [J].
Bosch, JLHR ;
Groen, J .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2000, 163 (04) :1219-1222
[9]   Alterations of cortical electrical activity in patients with sacral neuromodulator [J].
Braun, PM ;
Baezner, H ;
Seif, C ;
Boehler, G ;
Bross, S ;
Eschenfelder, CC ;
Alken, P ;
Hennerici, M ;
Juenemann, P .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2002, 41 (05) :562-566
[10]   Tailored laminectomy: A new technique for neuromodulator implantation [J].
Braun, PM ;
Boschert, J ;
Bross, S ;
Scheepe, JR ;
Alken, P ;
Juenemann, P .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1999, 162 (05) :1607-1609