Comparison of coagulation efficiency of aluminium and ferric-based coagulants as pre-treatment for UVC/H2O2 treatment of wastewater RO concentrate

被引:66
作者
Umar, Muhammad [1 ]
Ruddick, Felicity [1 ]
Fan, Linhua [1 ]
机构
[1] RMIT Univ, Sch Civil Environm & Chem Engn, Melbourne, Vic 3001, Australia
关键词
Coagulation; Reverse osmosis concentrate; UVC/H2O2; Dissolved organic matter; Biodegradability; REVERSE-OSMOSIS CONCENTRATE; SECONDARY EFFLUENT; HUMIC-ACID; OXIDATION; TECHNOLOGIES; OZONE; NOM;
D O I
10.1016/j.cej.2015.08.109
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Coagulation using two aluminium- (alum and aluminium chlorohydrate (ACH)) and two ferric-based coagulants (ferric chloride and ferric sulphate) was investigated as a pre-treatment for the UVC/H2O2 treatment of a high salinity municipal wastewater reverse osmosis concentrate (ROC). The ferric-based coagulants were generally better than alum, and ACH was the least efficient in removing dissolved organic carbon (DOC), colour, and A(254) (and thus improving UV transmittance (UVT)). Ferric-based coagulants removed a greater proportion of most of the DOC fractions. However the reduction of DOC was comparable (46-49%) for alum and ferric chloride at a similar metal dosage (1 mM) for UV fluence of 32 x 10(3) mJ/cm(2), whereas ferric sulphate performed significantly better (58%). A similar trend was observed for colour and A254 reduction, and UVT improvement. The biodegradability almost doubled for UV fluence of 32 x 10(3) mJ/cm(2) without pre-treatment. The change in biodegradability of the pretreated samples during UVC/H2O2 treatment was different for each coagulant, due to the difference in the content and type of organic matter removed. Ferric chloride was superior in terms of total DOC reduction and electrical energy dose (EED) for the treatment of the high salinity ROC to meet the target residual of 15 mg C/L. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:841 / 849
页数:9
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Standard methods for the examination of water and waste- water
[2]  
Atkinson R., 1979, ADV PHOTOCHEMISTRY
[3]   Characterisation and removal of recalcitrants in reverse osmosis concentrates from water reclamation plants [J].
Bagastyo, Arseto Y. ;
Keller, Jurg ;
Poussade, Yuan ;
Batstone, Damien J. .
WATER RESEARCH, 2011, 45 (07) :2415-2427
[4]   Impact of UV/H2O2 advanced oxidation treatment on molecular weight distribution of NOM and biostability of water [J].
Bazri, Mohammad Mandi ;
Barbeau, Benoit ;
Mohseni, Madjid .
WATER RESEARCH, 2012, 46 (16) :5297-5304
[5]  
Bromley D., P 4 INT LIV STOCK WA, V215
[6]  
Buxton GV, 1988, PHYS CHEM REF DATA, V17, P513, DOI DOI 10.1063/1.555805
[7]  
Cumming S., 2014, GLOBAL MARKETS REVER
[8]   Coagulation of humic acid by ferric chloride in saline (marine) water conditions [J].
Duan, J ;
Graham, NJD ;
Wilson, F .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 47 (01) :41-48
[9]   Coagulation of humic acid by aluminium sulphate in saline water conditions [J].
Duan, JM ;
Wang, JH ;
Graham, N ;
Wilson, F .
DESALINATION, 2002, 150 (01) :1-14
[10]   Seawater pretreatment for reverse osmosis: Chemistry, contaminants, and coagulation [J].
Edzwald, James K. ;
Haarhoff, Johannes .
WATER RESEARCH, 2011, 45 (17) :5428-5440