Endoscopic ultrasonography in tandem with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the management of suspected distal obstructive jaundice

被引:20
作者
Chu, Yan-Liu [1 ]
Wang, Xiao-Feng [1 ]
Gao, Xiao-Zhong [1 ]
Qiao, Xiu-Li [1 ]
Liu, Feng [1 ]
Yu, Song-Yang [2 ]
Zhang, Juan [1 ]
机构
[1] Binzhou Med Univ, Weihai Municipal Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Weihai 264200, Shandong, Peoples R China
[2] Binzhou Med Univ, Weihai Municipal Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Weihai 264200, Shandong, Peoples R China
关键词
distal; endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; endoscopic ultrasonography; obstructive jaundice; MAGNETIC-RESONANCE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; FINE-NEEDLE-ASPIRATION; PROSPECTIVE MULTICENTER; BILIARY OBSTRUCTION; THERAPEUTIC ERCP; RISK-FACTORS; EUS; COMPLICATIONS; ULTRASOUND; SPHINCTEROTOMY;
D O I
10.1097/MEG.0b013e32835ca1d7
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Goals To examine the benefits and feasibility of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in tandem for distal obstructive jaundice. Materials and methods From September 2007 to August 2012, patients with suspected distal obstructive jaundice were randomized to single-session EUS-ERCP (group A), EUS, and ERCP in different sessions (group B), and an ERCP-only procedure (group C). Data were prospectively collected on the following parameters: ERCP-avoided, duration of procedure, the dose of propofol, complications, and diagnostic yield. Results A total of 180 patients were divided randomly into 60 patients in group A, 60 in group B, and 60 in group C. A total of four therapeutic ERCP were canceled after EUS. The ERCP procedural time in group A was shorter, although not significantly different from that in group B (group A vs. group B: 41.24 +/- 7.57 vs. 43.38 +/- 6.57 min; P > 0.05), but both were significantly less than that in group C (group C: 49.12 +/- 7.46 min; P < 0.05). The total procedural time did not differ significantly between group A and group B (70.05 +/- 15.35 vs. 73.70 +/- 15.12 min; P > 0.05), nor were there significant differences in the dose of propofol between them (group A vs. group B: 357.11 +/- 115.86 vs. 369.55 +/- 133.86 mg; P > 0.05). In all, 22 anesthetic complications and 21 endoscopic complications occurred without significant differences among the three groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion As a triaging or a screening tool, diagnostic EUS gives added benefit to therapeutic ERCP. EUS and ERCP in a tandem approach are safe and feasible in patients with suspected distal obstructive jaundice. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 25:455-459 (C) 2013 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology 2013, 25:455-459
引用
收藏
页码:455 / 459
页数:5
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Arguedas MR, 2002, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V97, P898
  • [2] Arguedas MR, 2001, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V96, P2892
  • [3] Single-session endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for evaluation of pancreaticobiliary disorders
    Ascunce, Gil
    Ribeiro, Afonso
    Rocha-Lima, Caio
    Larsen, Marcelo
    Sleeman, Danny
    Merchan, Jaime
    Szabo, Deborah
    Levi, Joe U.
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2010, 24 (06): : 1447 - 1450
  • [4] Complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy: Results from a single tertiary referral center
    Barthet, M
    Lesavre, N
    Desjeux, A
    Gasmi, M
    Berthezene, P
    Berdah, S
    Viviand, X
    Grimaud, JC
    [J]. ENDOSCOPY, 2002, 34 (12) : 991 - 997
  • [5] Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: A prospective multicenter study
    Cheng, CL
    Sherman, S
    Watkins, JL
    Barnett, J
    Freeman, M
    Geenen, J
    Ryan, M
    Parker, H
    Frakes, JT
    Fogel, EL
    Silverman, WB
    Dua, KS
    Aliperti, G
    Yakshe, P
    Uzer, M
    Jones, W
    Goff, J
    Lazzell-Pannell, L
    Rashdan, A
    Temkit, M
    Lehman, GA
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2006, 101 (01) : 139 - 147
  • [6] Complications of ERCP: a prospective study
    Christensen, M
    Matzen, P
    Schulze, S
    Rosenberg, J
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2004, 60 (05) : 721 - 731
  • [7] Comparison of endoscopic ultrasonography and multidetector computed tomography for detecting and staging pancreatic cancer
    DeWitt, J
    Devereaux, B
    Chriswell, M
    McGreevy, K
    Howard, T
    Imperiale, TF
    Ciaccia, D
    Lane, KA
    Maglinte, D
    Kopecky, K
    LeBlanc, J
    McHenry, L
    Madura, J
    Aisen, A
    Cramer, H
    Cummings, O
    Sherman, S
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2004, 141 (10) : 753 - 763
  • [8] Same-day endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography after transduodenal endoscopic ultrasoundguided needle aspiration: do we need to be cautious?
    Di Matteo, F.
    Shimpi, L.
    Gabbrielli, A.
    Martino, M.
    Caricato, M.
    Esposito, A.
    De Cicco, M. L.
    Coppola, R.
    Costamagna, G.
    [J]. ENDOSCOPY, 2006, 38 (11) : 1149 - 1151
  • [9] Potential impact of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography workload and complication rate in patients referred because of abdominal pain
    Farrell, RJ
    Noonan, N
    Mahmud, N
    Morrin, MM
    Kelleher, D
    Keeling, PWN
    [J]. ENDOSCOPY, 2001, 33 (08) : 668 - 675
  • [10] Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy
    Freeman, ML
    Nelson, DB
    Sherman, S
    Haber, GB
    Herman, ME
    Dorsher, PJ
    Moore, JP
    Fennerty, MB
    Ryan, ME
    Shaw, MJ
    Lande, JD
    Pheley, AM
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 335 (13) : 909 - 918