Comparison of Skinfold Thickness Measured by Caliper and Ultrasound Scanner in Normative Weight Women

被引:17
作者
Lewandowski, Zdzislaw [1 ]
Dychala, Ewelina [1 ]
Pisula-Lewandowska, Agnieszka [2 ]
Danel, Dariusz P. [3 ]
机构
[1] Wroclaw Univ Hlth & Sport Sci, Fac Physiotherapy, Dept Human Biol, PL-51612 Wroclaw, Poland
[2] Wroclaw Univ Hlth & Sport Sci, Fac Physiotherapy, Dept Fundamentals Cosmetol, PL-51612 Wroclaw, Poland
[3] Polish Acad Sci, Hirszfeld Inst Immunol & Expt Therapy, Dept Anthropol, Ul Rudolfa Weigla 12, PL-53144 Wroclaw, Poland
关键词
adipose tissue; caliper; ultrasound scanner; adiposity; FAT DISTRIBUTION; BODY DENSITY; OBESITY; EQUATIONS; MEN;
D O I
10.3390/ijerph192316230
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Obesity is a major issue affecting not only adults but also children in many places of the world. There are numerous methods for estimating the body fat percentage, however, all of those methods are different in terms of availability, accuracy, and the cost of an individual examination. The aim of this study was to compare two relatively easy and widespread measurement methods for assessing skinfold thickness: the BodyMetrix BX2000 ultrasound machine and a classic GPM caliper. Fifty-eight young women aged 19-24 years with normative body weight participated in the study. We found that although the measurements performed by both methods are positively correlated, the obtained values were different. In seven out of nine measured points, these differences were statistically significant. The measurements of skin fat folds with a caliper showed a higher value of subcutaneous tissue compared to ultrasound measurements. Only the values of measurements on the pectoral and mid-axillary did not differ between the methods. We conclude that due to the significant discrepancies in the values of measured skinfold thickness, appropriate measurement tools and dedicated formulas estimating the amount of body fat should be used.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
Akyer SP., 2014, ANATOMY, V8, P2, DOI [10.2399/ana.14.037, DOI 10.2399/ANA.14.037]
[2]  
Barreira T.V., 2013, INT J EXERC SCI, V6, P20
[3]  
Cyrino Edilson Serpeloni, 2003, Rev Bras Med Esporte, V9, P150
[4]   Anthropometric reference data for international use: Recommendations from a World Health Organization Expert Committee [J].
deOnis, M ;
Habicht, JP .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 1996, 64 (04) :650-658
[5]   BODY FAT ASSESSED FROM TOTAL-BODY DENSITY AND ITS ESTIMATION FROM SKINFOLD THICKNESS - MEASUREMENTS ON 481 MEN AND WOMEN AGED FROM 16 TO 72 YEARS [J].
DURNIN, JVGA ;
WOMERSLEY, J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 1974, 32 (01) :77-97
[6]  
Farina R., 2012, Errors in Radiology, P79
[7]   GENERALIZED EQUATIONS FOR PREDICTING BODY DENSITY OF MEN [J].
JACKSON, AS ;
POLLOCK, ML .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 1978, 40 (03) :497-504
[8]  
Jakubowski W., 2011, STANDARDY BADA ULTRA, V4th
[9]   Obesity - a lifestyle disease [J].
Jung, Anna .
PEDIATRIA I MEDYCYNA RODZINNA-PAEDIATRICS AND FAMILY MEDICINE, 2014, 10 (03) :226-232
[10]   Sex differences in human adipose tissues - the biology of pear shape [J].
Karastergiou, Kalypso ;
Smith, Steven R. ;
Greenberg, Andrew S. ;
Fried, Susan K. .
BIOLOGY OF SEX DIFFERENCES, 2012, 3