Removing top leaves increases yield and nutrient uptake in maize plants

被引:9
作者
Raza, Muhammad Ali [1 ]
van der Werf, Wopke [2 ]
Ahmed, Mukhtar [3 ]
Yang, Wenyu [1 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Agr Univ, Coll Agron, 211 Huimin Rd, Chengdu 611130, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Wageningen Univ, Ctr Crop Syst Anal, POB 430, NL-6700 AK Wageningen, Netherlands
[3] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Agr Res Northern Sweden, Umea, Sweden
关键词
Maize; Nitrogen; Phosphorus; Potassium; Seed filling-phase; DRY-MATTER; WINTER-WHEAT; NITROGEN ACCUMULATION; GRAIN-YIELD; LEAF; REMOBILIZATION; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; ASSIMILATION; FERTILIZATION; TRANSLOCATION;
D O I
10.1007/s10705-020-10082-w
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
Intraspecific competition for light affects nutrient uptake of maize, especially during the seed filling phase (from the blistering-stage to physiological-maturity). Partial leaf removal only affects the top leaves and improves the light-environment, which could then enhance nutrient uptake during the seed filling phase. However, there is a shortage of quantitative information on the yield effects of such a management measure. A 3-year field trial was conducted to evaluate the impact of different leaf removal treatments (no removal of leaves (D0: control), removal of two leaves (D2), removal of four leaves (D4), and removal of six leaves (D6) from maize-canopy) on total dry matter accumulation, and nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium uptake at the blistering-stage and physiological-maturity, plus seed number per plant, seed weight, and seed yield at physiological maturity. Compared to D0, at physiological-maturity, D2 significantly increased total dry matter accumulation (by 9%), and uptake of nitrogen (by 5%), phosphorus (by 10%), and potassium (by 4%); while excessive leaf removal treatments considerably reduced dry matter accumulation and nutrient uptake. Importantly, during the seed filling phase of maize, treatment D2 significantly enhanced the uptake of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium by 76%, 40%, and 65%, respectively, compared to control. Treatment D2 increased seed number per plant (by 6.4%, from 448 under D0 to 477 in D2) and seed weight (by 5.7%). Relative to control, maize in D2 had 12%, 14%, and 11%, higher seed-yields in 2017, 2018, and 2019, respectively, and it also improved the economic profit when taking into account labor costs.
引用
收藏
页码:57 / 73
页数:17
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   Potassium Management for Improving Growth and Grain Yield of Maize (Zea mays L.) under Moisture Stress Condition [J].
Amanullah ;
Iqbal, Asif ;
Irfanullah ;
Hidayat, Zeeshan .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2016, 6
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1981, ACTA AGRONO SIN
[3]   Grain yield, and dry matter and nitrogen accumulation and remobilization in durum wheat as affected by variety and seeding rate [J].
Arduini, I. ;
Masoni, A. ;
Ercoli, L. ;
Mariotti, M. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2006, 25 (04) :309-318
[4]   A REVIEW OF PHOSPHORUS EFFICIENCY IN WHEAT [J].
BATTEN, GD .
PLANT AND SOIL, 1992, 146 (1-2) :163-168
[5]   Seed dry weight response to source-sink manipulations in wheat, maize and soybean:: a quantitative reappraisal [J].
Borrás, L ;
Slafer, GA ;
Otegui, ME .
FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2004, 86 (2-3) :131-146
[6]   Effects of reduced nitrogen inputs on crop yield and nitrogen use efficiency in a long-term maize-soybean relay strip intercropping system [J].
Chen, Ping ;
Du, Qing ;
Liu, Xiaoming ;
Zhou, Li ;
Hussain, Sajad ;
Lei, Lu ;
Song, Chun ;
Wang, Xiaochun ;
Liu, Weiguo ;
Yang, Feng ;
Shu, Kai ;
Liu, Jiang ;
Du, Junbo ;
Yang, Wenyu ;
Yong, Taiwen .
PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (09)
[7]  
Connor D.J., 2011, CROP ECOLOGY PRODUCT
[8]   GENETIC-VARIATION FOR NITROGEN ASSIMILATION AND TRANSLOCATION IN WHEAT .2. NITROGEN ASSIMILATION IN RELATION TO GRAIN-YIELD AND PROTEIN [J].
COX, MC ;
QUALSET, CO ;
RAINS, DW .
CROP SCIENCE, 1985, 25 (03) :435-440
[9]  
Damptey H, 1982, GHANA J SCI
[10]   Safflower yield, chlorophyll content, photosynthesis, and water use efficiency response to nitrogen fertilization under rainfed conditions [J].
Dordas, Christos A. ;
Sioulas, Christos .
INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS, 2008, 27 (01) :75-85