Livelihood strategies and forest dependence: New insights from Bolivian forest communities

被引:78
作者
Zenteno, Mario [1 ]
Zuidema, Pieter A. [1 ,2 ]
de Jong, Wil [3 ]
Boot, Rene G. A.
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Inst Environm Biol, Ecol & Biodivers Grp, NL-3508 TC Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Wageningen Univ, Ctr Ecosyst, NL-6700 AP Wageningen, Netherlands
[3] Kyoto Univ, Ctr Integrated Area Studies, Kyoto 6068501, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
Non timber forest products; Forest governance reforms; Community forestry; Brazil nut; Northern Bolivian Amazon; DEVELOPING-COUNTRIES; BRAZILIAN AMAZON; HOUSEHOLD; PRODUCTS; DEFORESTATION; CONSERVATION; MANAGEMENT; INCOME; NTFPS;
D O I
10.1016/j.forpol.2012.09.011
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Total income and income from forest resources among rural dwellers in tropical forest regions are influenced not only by market access, prices, but also organizational, institutional, and social factors. These factors influence the diversity of resources to which the poor have access and result in specializations in livelihood strategies. We analyzed the relation between forest dependence and livelihood strategies in the Bolivian Amazon, applying the SLF. We tested for the differences across strategies with respect to financial, human, physical, social, and natural livelihood assets. Results show that forest income is highly related to cash income from Brazil nut, while income from agriculture and timber exploitation is associated with higher levels of education. Brazil nuts serve as a safety net and start-up capital for certain livelihood strategies in our study region. Livelihood strategies that are based on the commercialization of multiple products from forests and agriculture and services inside and outside communities depend less on forests. Livelihoods can be supported by investing in sustainable livelihood asset endowments. Our results demonstrate that activities that aim to support community forest management and to enhance household income should explicitly consider a differentiated support for different strategies. This will result in a more effective outcome of development efforts from which the poorest people would benefit most. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:12 / 21
页数:10
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]   Rural household and forest: an evaluation of household's dependency on community forest in Nepal [J].
Adhikari, Mohan ;
Nagata, Shin ;
Adhikari, Murali .
JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH, 2004, 9 (01) :33-44
[2]   Common property institutions and sustainable governance of resources [J].
Agrawal, A .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2001, 29 (10) :1649-1672
[3]  
Algresti A., 2002, CATEGORICAL DATA ANA
[4]  
Anderson A.B., 1992, Conservation of Neotropical Forests: Working from Traditional Resource Use, P175
[5]  
Angelsen A., 2003, CIFOR occasional paper, P1, DOI 10.17528/cifor/001211
[6]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[7]   Can non-timber forest products match tropical forest conservation and development objectives? [J].
Arnold, JEM ;
Pérez, MR .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2001, 39 (03) :437-447
[8]  
Ashley C., 2000, Developing methodologies for livelihood impact assessment: Experience of the African Wildlife Foundation in East Africa
[9]   Household livelihood strategies and forest dependence in the highlands of Tigray, Northern Ethiopia [J].
Babulo, Bedru ;
Muys, Bart ;
Nega, Fredu ;
Tollens, Eric ;
Nyssen, Jan ;
Deckers, Jozef ;
Mathijs, Erik .
AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2008, 98 (02) :147-155
[10]  
Barham BradfordL., 1996, PROSPERITYS PROMISE