Perceived social support moderates the association between emotion regulation and psychological distress: a cross-sectional study among Japanese adults

被引:9
作者
Urano, Yuhei [1 ,2 ]
Ikeda, Tatsuya [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tokyo, Student Support Off, Sch Sci, Tokyo, Japan
[2] Kyoto Bunkyo Univ, Fac Clin Psychol, Kyoto 6110041, Japan
[3] Hiroshima Bunka Gakuen Univ, Fac Nursing, Hiroshima, Japan
关键词
Emotion regulation; social support; presence of others; moderation; psychological distress; MECHANISM; CONTEXT; VERSION;
D O I
10.1080/13548506.2020.1802051
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Previous studies have evaluated the adaptiveness of emotion regulation strategies as related to various outcomes; however, most studies have focused on the effects of intrapersonal strategies, independent of interpersonal contextual factors. The present study examined the moderating effects of perceived social support on the association between cognitive emotion regulation strategies and psychological distress. Data were cross-sectional from Internet survey panels. The survey targeted Japanese adults aged 20 to 79 years. The final analysis included data from 1200 participants. Results of regression analyses showed that higher levels of social support weaken the associations of both adaptive and maladaptive strategies with psychological distress. These results suggest that perceived availability of support may attenuate the negative effects of maladaptive emotion regulation strategies, although they may also weaken the positive effects of adaptive strategies. Therefore, psychological interventions should not only target individuals' emotion regulation strategies but also consider one's available social resources to promote better mental health.
引用
收藏
页码:1195 / 1205
页数:11
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   The Future of Emotion Regulation Research: Capturing Context [J].
Aldao, Amelia .
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2013, 8 (02) :155-172
[2]   Emotion-regulation strategies across psychopathology: A meta-analytic review [J].
Aldao, Amelia ;
Nolen-Hoeksema, Susan ;
Schweizer, Susanne .
CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2010, 30 (02) :217-237
[3]   When Are Adaptive Strategies Most Predictive of Psychopathology? [J].
Aldao, Amelia ;
Nolen-Hoeksema, Susan .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 121 (01) :276-281
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2010, SAKU U RES J NURSING
[5]   Measuring Relationship Quality in an International Study: Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Validity [J].
Chonody, Jill M. ;
Gabb, Jacqui ;
Killian, Mike ;
Dunk-West, Priscilla .
RESEARCH ON SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE, 2018, 28 (08) :920-930
[6]   The performance of the Japanese version of the K6 and K10 in the World Mental Health Survey Japan [J].
Furukawa, Toshi A. ;
Kawakami, Norito ;
Saitoh, Mari ;
Ono, Yutaka ;
Nakane, Yoshibumi ;
Nakamura, Yosikazu ;
Tachimori, Hisateru ;
Iwata, Noboru ;
Uda, Hidenori ;
Nakane, Hideyuki ;
Watanabe, Makoto ;
Naganuma, Yoichi ;
Hata, Yukihiro ;
Kobayashi, Masayo ;
Miyake, Yuko ;
Takeshima, Tadashi ;
Kikkawa, Takehiko .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF METHODS IN PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 2008, 17 (03) :152-158
[7]   Cognitive emotion regulation questionnaire - development of a short 18-item version (CERQ-short) [J].
Garnefski, Nadia ;
Kraaij, Vivian .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2006, 41 (06) :1045-1053
[8]   Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being [J].
Gross, JJ ;
John, OP .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 85 (02) :348-362
[9]   The Wisdom to Know the Difference: Strategy-Situation Fit in Emotion Regulation in Daily Life Is Associated With Well-Being [J].
Haines, Simon J. ;
Gleeson, John ;
Kuppens, Peter ;
Hollenstein, Tom ;
Ciarrochi, Joseph ;
Labuschagne, Izelle ;
Grace, Caitlin ;
Koval, Peter .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2016, 27 (12) :1651-1659
[10]   Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distress [J].
Kessler, RC ;
Andrews, G ;
Colpe, LJ ;
Hiripi, E ;
Mroczek, DK ;
Normand, SLT ;
Walters, EE ;
Zaslavsky, AM .
PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 2002, 32 (06) :959-976