Application of quality function deployment for the prioritization of National Board of Accreditation quality parameters

被引:9
作者
Singh, Ajit Kumar [1 ]
Rawani, A. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Technol Raipur, Dept Mech Engn, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India
关键词
QFD; NBA; Engineering institution; EDUCATION;
D O I
10.1108/QAE-11-2017-0078
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Purpose Owing to high competition in education sector, quality in education has become utmost important criteria to deliver better education service. For this purpose, it is required to monitor the quality of education. This paper aims to prioritize National Board of Accreditation (NBA) quality parameters in engineering education as per student's needs using quality function deployment (QFD). Design/methodology/approach This study is conducted among students of an institute of National importance in three stages. Stage 1 involves conducting interview with 23 students to find the student's requirement from an institute. Further Stage 2 involves importance rating collection through questionnaire survey method. In this stage, 228 students have given a rating of each student's requirement. Finally, Stage 3 involves establishing correlation between student's requirement and NBA quality parameters that has been done by 20 academic experts and finally making a QFD matrix for ranking of each NBA quality parameter. Findings The result of the study first indicates that among all students' requirements, job-oriented requirement is the most important need, and ergonomics-based requirement is the least important need of students. Further, to fulfill their needs, an institute has to focus on each NBA quality parameter. But among all NBA quality parameters, student's performance is highly desirable quality parameter.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 139
页数:13
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], P INT C TRANSF ENG E
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, NATL BOARD ACCREDITA, V91, P1
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2018, WEBLET IMPORTER
[4]  
Augusto M., 2005, P COBEM 2005 18 INT
[5]  
Boonyanuwat N., 2008, SONGKLANAKARIN J SCI, V30, P349
[6]   TOWARDS TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT IN HIGHER-EDUCATION AT ASTON-UNIVERSITY - A CASE-STUDY [J].
CLAYTON, M .
HIGHER EDUCATION, 1993, 25 (03) :363-371
[7]   Quality function deployment in the food industry: a review [J].
Costa, AIA ;
Dekker, M ;
Jongen, WMF .
TRENDS IN FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2000, 11 (9-10) :306-314
[8]  
Hill F.M., 1995, Quality Assurance in Education, V3, P10, DOI [DOI 10.1108/09684889510093497, 10.1108/09684889510093497]
[9]  
Jaraiedi M., 1994, SCHOOLING, V1, P1
[10]   An integrated decision making approach for ERP system selection [J].
Karsak, E. Ertugrul ;
Ozogul, C. Okan .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2009, 36 (01) :660-667