Effectiveness of early medical abortion using low-dose mifepristone and buccal misoprostol in women with no defined intrauterine gestational sac

被引:24
作者
Goldstone, Philip [1 ]
Michelson, Jill [1 ]
Williamson, Eve [1 ]
机构
[1] Marie Stopes Int Australia, Melbourne, Vic 3001, Australia
关键词
Abortion; Induced; Early pregnancy; Gestational sac; Mifepristone; Misoprostol; VAGINAL MISOPROSTOL; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; METHOTREXATE; ULTRASOUND; PREGNANCY;
D O I
10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.013
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: The study was conducted to assess the effectiveness of early medical abortion (EMA) in women with early pregnancy and no defined intrauterine gestational sac (IUGS) on ultrasound. Study Design: Retrospective, multicenter, observational study of oral mifepristone 200 mg and buccal misoprostol 800 mcg administered 24-48 h later for EMA (gestations <= 63 days). Odds ratios (ORs) [95% confidence intervals (Cis)] of EMA failure and continuing pregnancy for women with no defined TUGS vs. those with confirmed IUGS were calculated. Results: Women with no defined JUGS were more likely to experience EMA failure [9.0% (6/67) vs. 3.5% (465/13,345); OR (95% CI)=2.72 (1.17-6.33), p=.041] and continuing pregnancy [7.5% (5/67) vs. 0.6% (83/13,345); OR (95% CI)=12.72 (4.98-32.46), p9.001]. Conclusion: EMA failure is more likely in women with early pregnancy and no defined IUGS than those with gestations <= 63 days and confirmed JUGS. Trial Registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry identifier: ACTRN12611001051932. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:855 / 858
页数:4
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2011, CAR WOM REQ IND AB E
[2]   Double-blind randomized trial of mifepristone in combination with vaginal gemeprost or misoprostol for induction of abortion up to 63 days gestation [J].
Bartley, J ;
Brown, A ;
Elton, R ;
Baird, DT .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2001, 16 (10) :2098-2102
[3]   Medication Abortion [J].
Bartz, Deborah ;
Goldberg, Alisa .
CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 52 (02) :140-150
[4]   A randomized comparison of misoprostol 6 to 8 hours versus 24 hours after mifepristone for abortion [J].
Creinin, MD ;
Fox, MC ;
Teal, S ;
Chen, A ;
Schaff, EA ;
Meyn, LA .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 103 (05) :851-859
[5]   Change in serum beta-human chorionic gonadotropin after abortion with methotrexate and misoprostol [J].
Creinin, MD .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 174 (02) :776-778
[6]   Mifepristone and misoprostol administered simultaneously versus 24 hours apart for abortion - A Randomized controlled trial [J].
Creinin, Mitchell D. ;
Schreiber, Courtney A. ;
Bednarek, Paula ;
Lintu, Hanna ;
Wagner, Marie-Soleil ;
Meyn, Leslie A. .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2007, 109 (04) :885-894
[7]   Verifying the effectiveness of medical abortion; ultrasound versus hCG testing [J].
Fiala, C ;
Safar, P ;
Bygdeman, M ;
Gemzell-Danielsson, K .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2003, 109 (02) :190-195
[8]   Early medical abortion using low-dose mifepristone followed by buccal misoprostol: a large Australian observational study [J].
Goldstone, Philip ;
Michelson, Jill ;
Williamson, Eve .
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2012, 197 (05) :282-286
[9]   Safety of mifepristone abortions in clinical use [J].
Henderson, JT ;
Hwang, AC ;
Harper, CC ;
Stewart, FH .
CONTRACEPTION, 2005, 72 (03) :175-+
[10]   Medical methods for first trimester abortion [J].
Kulier, Regina ;
Kapp, Nathalie ;
Guelmezoglu, A. Metin ;
Hofmeyr, G. Justus ;
Cheng, Linan ;
Campana, Aldo .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2011, (11)