Effectiveness of early medical abortion using low-dose mifepristone and buccal misoprostol in women with no defined intrauterine gestational sac

被引:23
作者
Goldstone, Philip [1 ]
Michelson, Jill [1 ]
Williamson, Eve [1 ]
机构
[1] Marie Stopes Int Australia, Melbourne, Vic 3001, Australia
关键词
Abortion; Induced; Early pregnancy; Gestational sac; Mifepristone; Misoprostol; VAGINAL MISOPROSTOL; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; METHOTREXATE; ULTRASOUND; PREGNANCY;
D O I
10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.013
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: The study was conducted to assess the effectiveness of early medical abortion (EMA) in women with early pregnancy and no defined intrauterine gestational sac (IUGS) on ultrasound. Study Design: Retrospective, multicenter, observational study of oral mifepristone 200 mg and buccal misoprostol 800 mcg administered 24-48 h later for EMA (gestations <= 63 days). Odds ratios (ORs) [95% confidence intervals (Cis)] of EMA failure and continuing pregnancy for women with no defined TUGS vs. those with confirmed IUGS were calculated. Results: Women with no defined JUGS were more likely to experience EMA failure [9.0% (6/67) vs. 3.5% (465/13,345); OR (95% CI)=2.72 (1.17-6.33), p=.041] and continuing pregnancy [7.5% (5/67) vs. 0.6% (83/13,345); OR (95% CI)=12.72 (4.98-32.46), p9.001]. Conclusion: EMA failure is more likely in women with early pregnancy and no defined IUGS than those with gestations <= 63 days and confirmed JUGS. Trial Registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry identifier: ACTRN12611001051932. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:855 / 858
页数:4
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] Effectiveness of medical abortion with mifepristone and buccal misoprostol through 59 gestational days
    Fjerstad, Mary
    Sivin, Irving
    Lichtenberg, E. Steve
    Trussell, James
    Cleland, Kelly
    Cullins, Vanessa
    CONTRACEPTION, 2009, 80 (03) : 282 - 286
  • [2] Early medical abortion using low-dose mifepristone followed by buccal misoprostol: a large Australian observational study
    Goldstone, Philip
    Michelson, Jill
    Williamson, Eve
    MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2012, 197 (05) : 282 - 286
  • [3] Mifepristone and misoprostol for early abortion when no gestational sac is present
    Schaff, EA
    Fielding, SL
    Eisinger, S
    Stadalius, L
    CONTRACEPTION, 2001, 63 (05) : 251 - 254
  • [4] Early medical abortion with self-administered low-dose mifepristone in combination with misoprostol
    Song, Li-Ping
    Tang, Shi-Yan
    Li, Cui-Lan
    Zhou, Lee-Jaden-Gil-Yu-Kang
    Mo, Xue-Tang
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2018, 44 (09) : 1705 - 1711
  • [5] Low-dose mifepristone 200 mg and vaginal misoprostol for abortion
    Schaff, EA
    Eisinger, SH
    Stadalius, LS
    Franks, P
    Gore, BZ
    Poppema, S
    CONTRACEPTION, 1999, 59 (01) : 1 - 6
  • [6] Medical abortion outcomes after a second dose of misoprostol for persistent gestational sac
    Reeves, Matthew F.
    Kudva, Anupa
    Creinin, Mitchell D.
    CONTRACEPTION, 2008, 78 (04) : 332 - 335
  • [7] Efficacy and safety of medical abortion using mifepristone and buccal misoprostol through 63 days
    Gatter, Mary
    Cleland, Kelly
    Nucatola, Deborah L.
    CONTRACEPTION, 2015, 91 (04) : 269 - 273
  • [8] Very early medical abortion: treatment with mifepristone and misoprostol before ultrasonographic visualisation of an intrauterine pregnancy
    Tai, Natalie Qian Ru
    Reynolds-Wright, John Joseph
    Cameron, Sharon
    BMJ SEXUAL & REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2023, 49 (02) : 97 - 104
  • [9] Simultaneous very low dose mifepristone and vaginal misoprostol for medical abortion
    Kapp, N
    Borgatta, L
    Ellis, SC
    Stubblefield, P
    CONTRACEPTION, 2006, 73 (05) : 525 - 527
  • [10] Efficacy, Safety, and Acceptability of Low-Dose Mifepristone and Self-Administered Misoprostol for Ultra-Early Medical Abortion: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Li, Cui-Lan
    Song, Li-Ping
    Tang, Shi-Yan
    Zhou, Lee Jaden Gil Yu-Kang
    He, Hong
    Mo, Xue-Tang
    Liao, Yi-Ming
    REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES, 2017, 24 (05) : 731 - 737